Preview

caunca case digest

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1521 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
caunca case digest
Petitioner Efren C. Moncupa, together with others, was arrested on April 22, 1982 at about 10:50 P.M., at the corner of D. Street and Quezon Avenue, Quezon City. Moncupa D. Tuazon was brought to MIG-15 Camp Bago Bantay, Quezon City where he was detained. On April 23, 1982, on the allegation that he was a National Democratic Front (NDF) staff member, a Presidential Commitment Order (PCO) was issued against him and eight (8) other persons.
After two separate investigations, conducted first, by Lieutenant Colonel Gerardo Lantoria, Jr., Chief of Task Force Makabansa Investigation Group and second, by Investigating Fiscal Amado Costales of Quezon City, it was ascertained that the petitioner was not a member of any subversive organization. Both investigators recommended the prosecution of the petitioner only for illegal possession of firearms and illegal possession of subversive documents under Presidential Decree No. 33.
Consequently, two separate informations were filed against the petitioner, one, for illegal possession of firearms before the Court of First Instance of Rizal and the other for violation of P.D. 33 before the City Court of Quezon City. Against the other accused, however, the cases filed were for violation of P.D. 885 as amended. Significantly, the petitioner was excluded from the charge under the Revised Anti-Subversion Law. During the pendency of this petition, it is significant that his arraignment and further proceedings have not been pursued. And yet, the petitioner's motions for bail were denied by the lower court.
Hence, the petitioner filed the instant petition.
The respondents, in their return of the writ justified the validity of petitioner's detention on the ground that the privilege of the writ had been suspended as to the petitioner. However, on August 30, 1983, the respondents filed a motion to dismiss stating that on May 11, 1983, the petitioner was temporarily released from detention on orders of the Minister temporary of National

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Anna Hilo Case Digest

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Respondent Anna Hilo, M.D., (“Dr. Hilo”), by and through her undersigned counsel, pursuant to sections 120.60, 120.57, and 120.569, Florida Statutes, file this petition for formal administrative proceeding and state:…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Padilla

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The government filled a motion to dismiss this application on the arguments that Padilla’s lawyer could not file and sign the petitioner on his behalf because the lawyer was not proper next friend required in such applications. The government also argued that the respondent was the commander of the navy brig where Padilla was being held and not the Secretary of defense as indicated in the application. In addition, the government contended that the court lacked jurisdiction over the respondent who resided in another…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R. V. Vaillancourt

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is a formal request for an appeal against the ruling in the case of R . v. Vaillancourt. . Mr. Vaillancourt seeks to appeal the court’s decision based on the inconsistency with s.230(d) of the Criminal Code, and s. 7 and 11 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is present in this case, evident when Vaillancourt’s accomplice does not inform him of his plan to bring weapons to the crime scene, leading Vaillancourt to believe that his lack of knowledge of the presence of weapons should not constitute section 230 (d), as he believes that it imposes a certain degree of absolute criminal liability when it shouldn’t apply, as Vaillancourt had no mens rea present.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constitutional Law Case

    • 2466 Words
    • 10 Pages

    by the majority, in a contested judgment, in the High Court that such a detention…

    • 2466 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Case Reaction Paper

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We observed the case filed against Dan August Racaza and Hermocillo “Henie” Macaraya, who were in that time, detained. Before testifying, the witness, Alvin Clemente, a PDEA agent who was part of the team assigned to handle the case, took an oath. The witness narrated the story and said an informant went to their office located in Arlandon Street, Cebu City, about a drug dealing operation happening in Sitio Tunga, Barangay Tanke, Talisay City, relating to Dan August Racaza and Henie Macaraya. The latter was part of the PDEA Watch List containing a list of persons allegedly involved in drug trade but is yet to be confirmed. They put the accused under surveillance and planned an authorized buy-bust operation led by their team leader, Intelligence Officer 3 David Mark Maramba. Together with the informant, David briefed the team and Alvin was designated to be one of the poseur buyers. They prepared the things that will be needed for the operation like the money which was marked by Alvin’s initials. In June 21, 2012, they went to the area with 9 members including the witness. He said Racaza was standing by the door when they arrived and Macaraya was at the ground floor. The informant introduced them as his co-workers and told Racaza they’d like to “power-up”. Racaza invited them in and showed them a plastic container with different sachets of pots and shabu. Alvin bargained the sachet that costs 180 pesos to 2 for 300 pesos. Racaza and Macaraya agreed and asked him to pick what he likes. He chose 2 sachets that seemed to contain more than the rest and handed the mark money to Henie. Alvin made a signal then the team arrived and arrested the suspects. However, they fought back and a brief commotion ensued. David told the team to pull out. They recovered sachets from Racaza and another guy named Alot and the buy-bust money from Henie. These were under the custody of the witness after the operation and he marked it as “DAR-DBT”.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    - Juan Tañada, the petitioner, was appointed justice of the peace of Alabat, Tayabas, by the Governor-General with the advice and consent of the Philippine Commission on December 4, 1911.…

    • 2613 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ching vs ca evidence case

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages

    This is a petition for review on certiorari which seeks to nullify the decision of respondent Court of Appeals (penned by Hon. Rodolfo A. Nocon with the concurrence of Hon. Crisolito Pascual and Juan A. Sison) in CA-G.R. No. 12358-SP entitled Alfredo Ching v. Hon. M. V. Romillo, et al. which in effect affirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Rizal, now Regional Trial Court (penned by Judge Manuel V. Romillo, Jr. then District Judge, Branch XXVII Pasay City) granting ex-parte the cancellation of title registered in the name of Ching Leng in favor of Pedro Asedillo in Civil Case No. 6888-P entitled Pedro Asedillo v. Ching Leng and/or Estate of Ching Leng.…

    • 2558 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assertions - Essay

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Only 72 of the prosecution’s at least 300 witnesses have been presented. As many as 103 of the 196 suspects are still at large (and “roaming around” in Cotabato City, Romel Bagares, a lawyer for the families, said in a TV interview). Of the 93 in custody, 29 have yet to be arraigned, among them Zaldy Ampatuan, a former governor of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao. Of the 64 who have been arraigned, 50 have submitted petitions for bail, adding to the weighty load saddling the court of Judge Jocelyn Solis Reyes.”…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khan Jr. V. Simbillo

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    KHAN, JR. V SIMBILLO YNARES-SANTIAGO; August 19, 2003 (apple maramba) NATURE ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER in the Supreme Court and SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION in the Supreme Court. Certiorari. FACTS - Atty.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wheel of torture

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages

    President Aquino has promised to take steps to prosecute violators of human rights in past years. Some rights groups say violations have continued with impunity under the Aquino’s administration. The officers, who had been relieved of their posts, were identified as Chief Insp. Arnold Formento, SPO1 Alexander Asis, PO3 Freddie Ramos, PO2 Marc Julius Caesar, PO2 Aldwin Tibuc, PO2 Melmar Baybado Viray, PO1 Nelson Caribo, SPO2 Bernardino Artisen, PO2 Mateo Cailo and PO2 Renan Galang. The people think that it is not appropriate that the officers were only relieved of their posts. They should have received a more proper punishment like imprisonment, or paying fines.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lula

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Midnight of December 22, 1936, the defendant andappellant Anastacio Apolinar alias Atong was at thattime the occupant of a parcel of land owned by JoaquinGonzales in Papallasen, La Paz, Umingan, Pangasinan.Armed with a shotgun, Atong was looking over said landwhen he observed that there was a man carrying abundle on his shoulder.Believing that he was a thief (of palay), the defendantcalled his attention but he ignored him.The defendant fired in the air and then at the person.The man, identified as Domingo Petras, was able to getback to his house and consequently narrated to AngelNatividad, the barrio chief, that he had been woundedin the back by a shotgun.He then showed the two wounds - one in each side of the spinal column - which wounds were circular in formand a little bigger than a quarter of an inch, according tothe medical report of Dr. Mananquil.Petras died of the wounds he sustained.The defendant surrendered to the authoritiesimmediately after the incident and gave a swornstatement (Exhibit F) before the Justice of Peace of Umingan on December 23, 1936.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    during Rizal’s time and werenotoriously corrupt. Justice was costly, partial and slow. Poor Filipinos had noaccess to the courts because they could not afford the heavy expenses of litigation.Wealth, social prestige, and color of skin were dominant factors in winning a case incourt. Even Jose Rizal, brother Paciano and his mother, Teodora was unjustlyarrested, deported or exiled to various part of the archipelago without due processof law.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    natural resources

    • 5462 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The prosecution filed a motion for reconsideration on the order underscoring the fact that the accused presented Private Land Timber Permit No. 030140 dated February 10, 1991 which had expired; that while the certificate of origin indicated Brgy. Sta. Cruz, the product actually came from Sitio Cadiz, and that the two jeeps bearing the product were not equipped with certificates of transport agreement. Added to this was the fact that, if the product…

    • 5462 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arellano V. Busto, A Compilation of the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines, ISBN-971-8961-30-5, 2003…

    • 12387 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    basta basta

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the case of Ligeralde vs. Patalinghug and Republic (G.R. No. 168796; 15 April 2010), the High Court held that the “(wife’s) act of living an adulterous life cannot automatically be equated with a psychological disorder, especially when no specific evidence was shown that promiscuity was a trait already existing at the inception of marriage.” Her husband, who petitioned to have their marriage declared void, must be able to establish that his wife’s unfaithfulness was a manifestation of a disordered personality, which made her completely unable to discharge the essential obligations of the marital state. He failed in this respect; neither his testimony nor the psychologist’s findings showed the root cause of his wife’s alleged incapacity. The Court stressed that the root cause of the psychological incapacity must be identified as a psychological illness, its incapacitating nature fully explained and established by the totality of the evidence presented during trial. The Court concluded that while petitioner’s wife had some character flaws and was far from being a perfect wife and a good mother, these imperfections did not warrant a conclusion that she had a psychological malady at the time of the marriage that rendered her incapable of fulfilling her marital and family duties and obligations.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays