Preview

Cause of Action: Angel Tool and Equipment Manufacturing, Inc., vs. Cut Above Construction, Llc,

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
474 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cause of Action: Angel Tool and Equipment Manufacturing, Inc., vs. Cut Above Construction, Llc,
CAUSE OF ACTION: Angel Tool and Equipment Manufacturing, Inc., vs. Cut Above Construction, LLC,
FACTS: Angel and Cut Above entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of a specialized crane. Pursuant to the contract Cut Above is to pay Angel $100,000.00 for the manufacture of a crane with special hydraulics. Cut Above paid Angel a deposit of $50,000.00 with the remainder to be paid to Angel upon delivery of the crane, per specifications, on January 15, 2011. Following a conversation with Angel’s executive Cut Above’s understanding from the executive was that the crane would not be completed until January 31, 2011, at which time it was to be shipped via truck FOB the construction site. The crane arrived on February 4, 2011, and Cut Above accepted delivery of the crane but withheld from its final payment to Angel its cost of renting another crane, as well as anticipated delay costs on the project. Cut Above withheld $5,000.00 for the cost of the crane rental as well as $5,000.00 for the delay costs.
ISSUE: Whether delay of the crane delivery entitled Cut Above to withhold any money from payment. Whether delay of the crane delivery entitled Cut Above to damages.
LAW: UCC § 2–607. Effect of Acceptance; Notice of Breach; Burden of Establishing Breach After Acceptance; Notice of Claim or Litigation to Person Answerable Over. UCC § 2–717. Deduction of Damages From the Price. UCC § 2-712. "Cover"; Buyer's Procurement of Substitute Goods. UCC § 2-607. Effect of Acceptance; Notice of Breach; Burden of Establishing Breach After Acceptance; Notice of Claim or Litigation to Person Answerable Over.
RATIONALE: The court holds in favor of the defendant, Cut Above concerning damages resulting from the plaintiffs, Angels, failure to perform. The buyer may withhold those damages from any payment of purchase price remaining due (U.C.C. 2-717), but will be denied damages absent timely notice of breach to the seller (U.C.C. 2-607(3)(a)). Cut Above made timely inquires

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This case is an interesting one because it gets right into the core of the confliction between the proprieties of contractual agreement. This case is focused primarily on Osborne Development Corp. and the multiple defects customers are experiencing with their homes. These upset customers are suing this Corporation in attempts to collect reparations for the discrepancies faced. The homeowners who purchased homes form Osborne Development Corp. (ODC) negligently purchased these homes. According to the Home Buyers Warranty ( HBW), “ Any and all claims disputes and controversies by or between the Homeowner, the Builder, the Warrant Insure and/or HBW…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff Wendling

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff Wendling, who was a farmer and stockman, met Defendant Puls, who was a cattle buyer in July 1973. The two got to talking and Wendling informed Puls that there was a possibility that he would have cattle for sale around mid August. On August 13th, Puls received a call from Wendling letting him know that he had cattle ready to be sold. The two later met, along with Puls’s financial assistance Watson and agreed on a sales price based on the weight of the cattle on August 16th. Puls left a deposit of 1,000 dollars with Wendling for the cattle. On the scheduled date for pick up, Puls requested an additional week for delivery of the cattle. Needless to say, after the week went by there was no sign of Puls. He failed to respond to any of phone calls or messages left by Wendling. When he was finally able to reach Puls on August 27th, he learned that Puls didn’t have a place to store the cattle. Since there were so many issues, Wendling asked Puls for an additional down payment, which was refused by Puls. Puls went on to suggest that maybe he should just sell his cattle to someone else. At that time, Wendling suggested to Puls that he provide him with a written release, which he just ignored. Wendling went on to seek legal advice and was advised to get a written release from Puls before engaging in another sale of the cattle. Wendling tried to reach Puls, but was unsuccessful; however he was able to reach Watson. He asked Watson if they both would meet him at his lawyers’ office, so that he could obtain a release from the contract in order…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: Ronlee, the plaintiff, entered in a contract with DOT based on a bid that was given on March 7, 1984. Five days after signing the contract, the plaintiff notified the defendant that the bid contained a unilateral error of $317,463, still bringing it under the next lowest bid. In response, the…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    KILARJIAN v. VASTOLA

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: On March 18, 2004, plaintiff’s, Carol Kilarjian and Dave de Castro, and defendants, John Vastola and Joan Vastola, entered into a contract for the sale of 136 East Cliff St., Somerville. The final date was scheduled for June 15, 2004. On June 14, 2004, defendant’s real estate attorney wrote plaintiff’s attorney stating that defendants had elected not to proceed to convey title. Plaintiff’s contended that the difference in the financing costs they experience because of the delay should be presented as damages because the breach by defendants will result in a higher financing cost. Also, plaintiffs strongly stress the breach of contract because they suffered costs and attorney’s fees as well as financing costs for the delay in acquiring a second mortgage obligation; Defendant’s delay should be calculated as damages for plaintiffs. On June 15, 2004, plaintiffs' real estate attorney forwarded a time-of-the-essence letter to defendants, setting a closing date of June 25, 2004. Defendants failed to close and are not willing to close on the property. Defendants do not dispute the weight of the contract. However, Mrs. Vastola's spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) began to accelerate. In defense of their position, defendants provided a letter from Mrs. Vastola's doctor, Mark J. Brown, which explained that SMA is a progressive neurological condition that, as a result, disables her from all daily activities because of her arms and legs are weak which results in putting Mrs. Vastola in no condition to sell her house and move. Correspondingly the defendants argue that since the time they signed the contract for the sale of the home, Mrs. Vastola’s conditions become increasingly worse, should excuse the performance in proceeding with the sale of their house. Besides the plaintiffs were well aware of Mrs. Vastola’s condition when…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Frigaliment sued B.N.S. There were two contracts that involved selling chickens. In the first contract B.N.S was in agreeance with selling 75,000 pounds of 2.5-3 pounds of chicken, to Frigaliment. 50,000 pounds of chicken at 2.5-3 pounds at a higher price were agreed in the second contract. B.N.S fulfilled the first contract with two shipments. The first shipment fell short. B.N.S made up for the short shipment in their second shipment. Frigaliment accused B.N.S of shipping the larger chicken not to their expectations. Frigaliment protested the rest of the shipments. B.N.S said that their only obligations was to ship chicken that met the requirements stated in the contract.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Little Steel Company is a small steel fabricator that makes steel parts for various metal machine shops. When Little receives an order from a client, it must locate and purchase 10 tons of a certain grade of steel to complete the order. Little sends an e-mail message to West Coast Steel Company inquiring into the availability of 10 tons of the described grade of steel. West Coast replies by e-mail that it has available the required 10 tons of steel and quotes $450 per ton. Little replies by e-mail that it will purchase the 10 tons of described steel at the quoted price. The e-mails are signed electronically by Little and West Coast. There is no date set forth in the e-mails for delivery. When the steel arrives, Little rejects shipment, claiming the steel was shipped too late. When West Coast sues Little for breach of contract, Little also raises the defense of the Statute of Frauds. Who wins, and why?…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Here, plaintiff sufficiently set forth the terms of the parties' Property Settlement Agreement concerning plaintiff's interest in defendant's Deferred Compensation Agreement The issue of the case…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torts 1 Outline Pittman

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages

    2. Issue: Whether P can recover for the loss of wages during those 9 days, the destruction of personal property b/c of injury, and the conscious pain and suffering he experienced in the 9 days…

    • 27721 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dispute occurred in Victoria between a registered company, Tallerman & Co Pty Ltd ("the plaintiff") and an incorporated company, Nathan's Merchandise Pty Ltd. ("the defendant), where both parties operated their business. Two previous binding contracts (orders No. 58 and No. M57) were made in communications on 14th May 1951 and 2nd August 1951 respectively, each for the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of 1,000,000 Hungarian .22 bullets. A consignment of 1,800,000 bullets for the above orders was dispatched from Sydney to the defendant by rail on the 12th February 1952 and was received by a carrier employed by the defendant in Melbourne who stored the bullets in the defendant's warehouse, where they resided for three days. Claiming that under the contractual terms, those bullets should only be delivered when requested, the defendant refused to take the delivery, and thus reconsigned the bullets back to Sydney by rail. On 3rd March 1952 a letter by the plaintiff's solicitor was sent out requiring the defendant to accept the "contractual goods" and that otherwise necessary steps would be taken to enforce the plaintiff's legal rights. On 6th March the defendant's solicitors responded by reasserting the stance that it had been settled from the start that delivery of bullets should be made only when the defendant required them, to fulfill its customers' orders. In addition the defendant's solicitors raised the further point that the location of delivery in Melbourne was inconsistent with the contractual terms.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 14 P6

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    All consequences of the breach of the condition are deemed to be sufficiently serious to justify termination. The buyer cannot terminate the contract if the non-conformity is a minor defect and slight breach. Slight breach is treated as a breach of warranty in the business sales contract. Slight breach is the breach when the conse-quences of breach do not go to the root of the contract or detriment the purpose of the contract. If the buyer accepts the goods there is no right of termination because termi-nation remedy required…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ptarmigan Investment

    • 320 Words
    • 1 Page

    The case that was present in 16.5 is that a breach of contract by Ptarmigan Investment Company who had contracted Gunderson’s, Inc. to construct a golf course for them. After just a third of the work had been completed, Ptarmigan Investment Company ran out of funds to cater for the rest of the project. Therefore, they would not be in a position to pay for the remaining two thirds of the work. Gunderson’s, Inc. has sued the company in a bid to recover the lost profits which if granted would be given to them as damages. The question presented is whether Gunderson’s, Inc. can recover the lost profits as damages. It is evident that the investment company has gone against its agreement with the contractor. Ptarmigan Investment Company has rendered inferior performance of its obligations under the contract. In an unprecedented turn of events, they are unable to pay the contractor for their services. Although the work was yet to be completed, the contractor had anticipated a certain amount of profit. Therefore, they are justified under the law to claim compensation from the breaching party. Gunderson, Inc. can receive damages in form of monetary compensation. This is one of the methods used to remedy contract breaches. Compensatory damages are awarded in the event that a breach of contract has led to a loss of a bargain. In so doing it places the non-breaching party in the same position it would have been had the contract been fully performed with regard to the benefits accrued. In this case, payment to the contractor was estimated at $1,294,129 and payment had already been made for a third of the work. The sum of money owed to restore the bargain made is $ 867,066, which would ensure that the contractor has earned their full profits. Gunderson’s, Inc. can recover lost profits as damages because the contract was breached before completion of the construction…

    • 320 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A supplier has the right to tell a retailer how much to charge for its products. (F)…

    • 1253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over The Years

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A contracting company is involved in a dispute over its bill to a customer. The bill for $500,000 was recently reduced to $400,000 by a decision of the courts. The company is appealing the decision.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Grand Fabricating Co. and Good Corp. agreed orally that Good would custom manufacture a compressor for Grand at a price of $120,000. After Good completed the work at a cost of $90,000, Grand notified Good that the compressor was no longer needed. Good is holding the compressor and has requested payment from Grand. Good has been unable to resell the compressor for any price. Good incurred storage fees of $2,000. If Grand refuses to pay Good and Good sues Grand, the most Good will be entitled to recover is…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Knzales And Barkley Case

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are several things that have gone wrong in the case we were given to examine. Knarles had left his 17-year-old son Barkley to look after the Maryland based facilities maintenance business while Knarles attended a convention in Hawaii. The exact scope of the duties to be performed in Knarles’ absence was not given to the reader. Knarles and Barkley’s company had a roster of satisfied clients who they maintained a working relationship without the benefit of a signed renewal contract. Knarles had a professional relationship with his clients for a number of years, an express contract would not be considered unusual under these circumstances. Part of the services Knarles and Barkley (referred to hereafter as K & B) provided was a paid replacement of outdated and…

    • 2126 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays