Religious extremism, economic disparity, taking advantage of power. This causes might turn into personal problems and society …show more content…
I don't believe all terrorist are bad. For an example, adolf hitler was seen as a demon to other people besides the germans who supported his project. Hitler wanted to help germany get back to peak form. Johann elser understood what hitler wanted to do and tried to stop him. Hitler was understanding and very responsible on what the germans needed accomplished. The workers,soldier,citizens and people in the neighboring countries might be affected by hitler introduction but germans will not be on these terms. He built an empire , he’s achievements , actions and ambitions were big. Adolf hitler was a veteran of world war one, made an entry into politics. Hitler was imprisoned , a candidate for president and served as a term chancellor of germany. Hitler gained 600 supporters during his chancellor years. Hitler built railroads, car, trucks,buildings and factories, weapons, tanks and missiles. Adolf hitler was the leader of the germans. I really believe that terrorist are not bad if they help out their environment and improved everyone around him. Hitler was called for a new selection, the nazi party gained control with hitler in head of things. Hitler controlled an entire nation with propaganda,bribery and cruelty. Why do terrorist attack innocent people? Terrorist are in a asymmetric warfare with the public situations, groups that are facing more powerful groups. Force is the only thing they can imply to catch a certain group's …show more content…
But it wasn’t an act of complication. this act was what it shouldn’t been already apparently it was for the part of the lost on the political and media situation reacting to the accident. At this time the incident was serious as an act of terrorism by the media, despite lacking proof as to the gunman’s identity or reason. The political leadership was in the worst shape because of the Prime Minister of the canadian counsel connecting to the act of the Canada’s decision to support the American warfare campaign to fight ISIS. The PM consistent that he connected everyday and only calling back the historic background and stopping the shooting might be considered as a lawbreaker . Then, the work was discussed has already been complete, The overall public was ready to accept what had happen with the lawbreakers. The Outbreak came from the platitudes with all of commentators deciding on Canada lost its innocence to terrorism it had a big impact on the final outcome to the shores of the Canadians. The canadians had to illustrate that they were not going to be scared, there responses was not offered on how the communities political references or cultural power might be shattered by one single shooter or that the passed acts of terrorism in Canada was during the 1970s .The FLQ active actions to the American bombings by Cubans revolutions in Montreal and Toronto wouldn’t be left