Preview

Causes Of The Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1049 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes Of The Civil War
The Civil War was one the worst wars that the United States has ever fought in. More soldiers died in this war than any others that the United States has fought in. To understand the Civil War, the events that led to the war need to be understood. The Civil War had many events that would eventually lead to the war. The Fugitive Slave Act was passed by Congress in 1850, and was put into effect throughout the United States. The Fugitive Slave Act stated that any runaway slave was to be returned to their master. This meant that any slave, did not matter their location in the U.S., was to be returned to their plantation owner, back in the south. The act also caused many free African Americans to be taken back to the south by slave catchers in …show more content…
Dred Scott was a slave that lived in Missouri, and his master moved to Illinois taking Scott with him. They lived there for ten years, where Scott married and started a family. After ten years Scott’s master waited to move back with Scott and his family. Scott said that he was now a free slave because it had been ten years, and in Illinois a slave was to be set free after ten years. Scott attempted to take his master to the Supreme Court, and the court ruled in favor of the master. The judge dismissed the case because blacks had no citizenship and therefore couldn’t fill a case. The judge told Scott in a letter, that slaves had no rights that whites had to respect and that they were only property. Scott and his family had to go back with Scott’s master and become slaves again. This caused even further division between the south and the north. The south was very happy with the outcome of the judges decision while the northerners were very outraged by …show more content…
The Northerner democrats nominated Stephen Douglas, but the Southerners nominated John C. Breckinridge. John Bell was nominated by the Constitutional Union Party that was created by the border state Whigs. The Republicans nominated Abraham Lincoln who was a moderate which meant that he didn’t want to get rid of slavery but to contain it. Lincoln ended up winning the election with a thirty eight percent vote, but only won the north. The south did not vote for Lincoln and nine states did not even include Lincoln on the ballot. The south's response to Lincoln winning the election was to initiate a secession, and the lower half of the south left the Union. The upper part of the south stayed with the Union, only to leave later on. After the south left, the Civil War officially started soon

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln, Stephen Douglass, John C. Breckinridge, and John Bell were the four candidates of the election. Lincoln had two years earlier beaten Douglass to the Senatorial seat, and now he tried to beat him again with the Presidential Election. The Democratic Party was split, so they decided on two cadidates which were Breckinridge and Douglass. The Constitutional Union chose Bell, and the Republicans had Lincoln. With his campaign revolving around westward expansion and abolition, Lincoln did not get very many supporters. The people of the country more so wanted Douglass. With only 40% of the entire country's votes Lincoln won the presidency. Douglass came in second with ~30%, Breckinridge ended third with ~20%, and Bell rounded out the four in las place with only about 13%. Lincoln, the sectional president, had not been elected for four days when South Carolina seceded. The blame rested on Buchanan's shoulders, for he was the president still until March 1861. This was ultimately the cause for disunion. During the election, or rather the time of campaigning, South Carolina had stated that if Lincoln was elected they would secede; and they went through with their word. Sectionalist tensions has risen to a peak and cracked under pressure. The Missouri Compromise was no longer available to be a scapegoat, and neither were the other political controversies. The Union's last leg to stand on was kicked out from under it. It would take several more months until the actual war started; however, by this point it is clearly inevitable. Political compromise was out of the question, and by then it was only a matter of time before the first shots were…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was born into slavery sometime in 1795, in Southampton County, Virginia. His actions helped him become a big part in how he shaped the court and slavery. When Dred scott was brought into free states while he was a slave he thought it to be wrong because they were free states. Dred scott argued they should restrict(to confine or keep within limits, as of space, action, choice, intensity, or quantity) the entrance of slave owners into free states if they have slaves with them, or that the slaves should be free if they enter a free state. This topic(a subject of conversation or discussion) made it up to the supreme court where Roger B. Taney(Chief justice of the supreme court) said that Dred Scott did not have any right to bring his…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision of 1857 is one of the most famous Supreme Court decisions because it declared that slaves could never become citizens of the United States. The Court’s 6-3 decision stated that the Constitution could not protect blacks and “blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” Since slaves could never become citizens they had no right to sue and Dred Scott remained a slave. The courts reputation following this decision plummeted to an all time low in the North and now Republicans of the time viewed the court as controlled by the Slave Power.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court first heard the case of Dred Scott vs. Sanford in 1857. Dred Scott was a slave who lived in Missouri with his owner. His owner took him to Illinois and Minnesota, two states that prohibited slavery. After the owner died, Scott proclaimed himself a free man and his family free due to the fact that he had resided on “free soil” for several years and that his four children had also been born on “free soil”. He sued the man’s widow and won and lost his case in several courts over an 11 year period. At this point in history, the Missouri Compromise had been in effect for about 40 years, but was never officially ruled on by the Supreme Court. Many Southerners were hoping that the Compromise be ruled unconstitutional due to the…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott Thesis Statement

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In my paper I will be discussing a story about a man name Dred Scott. I also will outline and discuss Mr. Dred Scott life and what led up to the case in which we know as Dred Scott v. Sanford he is a slave sold to Sanford by Emerson. Emerson took Dred Scott from Missouri slave state to Illinois free state and to Louisiana Territory (free), then back to Missouri slave. Dred Scott argues that he becomes a free citizen by way of his travel through Illinois and also his time in a free territory. He also argues that his family was free by way of Louisiana Territory.…

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision was a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States decreeing all slaves to be property. As such, slaves were denied any and all rights given to citizens in the Constitution. Most importantly, the ruling determined Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery from westward expansion. This ruling created a pivotal point in the moral battlefield of slavery and its place in our country’s history. The decision polarized the population on the issue of slavery resulting in distinctive geographical ideologies.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many times during our class discussions and lectures we tried to examine the stages leading up to the succession and Civil War in America. During the critical time period of the middle 19th century, the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision of the Supreme Court was one of those major treads on the pathway to secession. The man Dred Scott was taken to Missouri with Peter Blow as a slave from Virginia and sold. His new master from Missouri then moved to the free state of Illinois for a while, but later moved back to Missouri. Following his master 's passing, Scott asserted that since he had resided in a free state, he was inevitably a free citizen.…

    • 2271 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott case: Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man in the United States who sued for the freedom of himself his wife and their two daughters. Mr. Scott unsuccessfully won the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford of 1857, which was otherwise known as the "Dred Scott Decision." The Dred Scott case was regarded as one of the worst supreme court decisions of all times. It stated that nor free or enslave African Americans could be American…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time around the dred scott cases slavery was banned in some states via the missouri compromise. Dred Scott had been living in along with his family had lived in a U.S territory where slavery was banned. Scott argued that since he had lived in that territory for a while that he and his family should have ultimately been granted freedom. Dred Scott also tried to sue for the wages that had been held from him while the case had been in motion which ended in the court ruling in favor of John Sanford.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil war was the war that changed all America at the end of the it. It was that the north did not want slavery but for everyone to freedom and live there own live. But the south did not agree with the north on how they wanted to be freedom instead of slavery. So the south decide to fight against the north to keep slavery and make them do all the work. So the south began the war with the north to make sure that the north know that the south will fight to keep slavery.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War lasted 1861-1865. The war resolved two fundamental questions left unresolved by the revolution: whether the United States was to be a dissolvable confederation of sovereign states or an indivisible nation with a sovereign national government; and whether this nation, born of a declaration that all men were created with an equal right to liberty, would continue to exist as the largest slaveholding country in the world. The civil war was the United States bloodiest war in America history. It was a war when this great nation was divide. The north versus the south.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causes Of The Civil War

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Civil War was arguably the bloodiest war in American history. With around 800,000 casualties, the war caused more victims than World War 1, the American Revolution, and the Vietnam War. Many people believe the war could have been avoided altogether, but I personally feel like there was too much involved for it to have been completely avoided. The main causes of the war were issues regarding slavery, conflict of power between states and the government, and conflict over government taxation.…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays