Preview

Causes Of The Nullification Crisis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
311 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Causes Of The Nullification Crisis
The nullification crisis was a big deal back in the day, everyone had very differentiated opinions on the matter. The south carolina during this time was a very agriculture based society and the north being very industrialized. The north gained from tarrifs because it made their income larger and their goods much more profitable. The south Carolingian however did not benefit at all. Being mostly agriculture the raw materials costed much more to prodice and sell to the americans with tarrifs. South Carolina did not see this as very fair and chose to ignore this. Jackson was very against this and the states ignoring laws. He felt that if they werent following laws and putting themselves apart that they would eventually suceede from them. There
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3
    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Copy Of Andrew Jackson Pros And Cons
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Copy Of Andrew Jackson Pros And Cons

    Andrew Jackson Pros and Cons Pros Cons He was the first self­made man to become President. Before he was president, he invaded Florida against orders. He was only instructed to capture runaway slaves but he conquered the territory and wiped out entire Seminole villages.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analysis of Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren
    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis of Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren

    Andrew Jackson was a war hero turned president, but his battles did not end with his election. One type of problem Jackson faced was economic. South Carolinian planters saw that the protective tariff, passed by Congress in 1824, as oppressive since most of the revenue made from it was invested in the northeast’s manufacturing industry. They were more infuriated when the tariff was raised in the summer of 1828 (Brinkley 207). The South Carolinians and Vice President John C. Calhoun saw the taxes as “blatantly unconstitutional, exceeding Congress’s powers to raise necessary revenues and oppressing one section of the country while enriching others” (Wilentz 63). A nullification document written by Calhoun known as the South Carolina Exposition and Protest was passed by the state legislature in 1832 as a response. This text announced that any state could declare its original sovereignty and disregard federal laws that are found offensive in their borders. In retaliation, Jackson sent federal troops to South Carolina to enforce the law, but before any violence could ensure the state backed down (Brinkley 207). This created a strong rift between the Jackson and his vice president that turned in to a bitter rivalry between the two. Jackson’s…

    • 1818 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The issue of slavery became an even greater concern when the Louisiana Purchase territories were to enter the Union as states. The question was, would new territories enter the Union as slave or free states? The South wanted a balance of power. They knew that if the North were to have more free states, then slavery in the south could be facing extinction through congress. In an attempt to conciliate with the South, the North agreed upon the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through this, slavery was banned above the 36 degrees 30 minute line and Missouri entered as a slave state, Maine a free state. For a while, it retained the balance of power. However, tempers in the south rose again later in the 1820s over high tariffs. The tariffs benefitted the north but threatened southern cotton exports. In 1828, the tariff was around 50%. President Jackson modified it to around 33% in 1832 only to have South Carolina nullify it in the state. It raised the question of whether or not the federal government could legally impose protective tariffs and whether it was constitutional for a state to nullify a federal law. "South…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyze The Nullification Crisis Analysis
    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze The Nullification Crisis Analysis

    The Nullification Crisis was a sectional crisis in 1832–33, while Andrew Jackson was president, which was complicated by a confrontation between South Carolina and the federal government. The crisis ensued after South Carolina declared that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and therefore null and void within the sovereign boundaries of the state.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq 1850's

    The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South evidently did not…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nullification Crisis Dbq
    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page

    Nullification Crisis Dbq

    The Nullification Crisis was a sectional crisis in 1832-1833 that involved a confrontation between South Carolina and the Federal Government. Andrew Jackson was the president while this was happening. The crisis guranteed after South Carolina declared that the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were unconstitutional and for that…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

    John Preston quickly established the viewpoint of the south in his speech: the states had the right to secede. The premise of his argument was that each state had given power to the federal government but still retained “sovereign capacity” (Preston 1). Sovereign capacity meant that the…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study
    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott Case Study

    The Supreme Court in this case, essentially threw out the Missouri Compromise, which was essentially only legislation keeping the battle between free states and slave states at bay. The Missouri Compromise was the only remaining bandage left covering the wound between the northern and southern states, due to the division of slave ownership. The reason behind labeling the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional is due to the fact that congress has no power to pass any legislature concerning personal property, and by doing so would infringe upon individuals personal rights. However, if all of the above was not enough to frighten the state rights fighters, then the fact that this Supreme Court decision essentially stripped states the right to decide whether or not they wanted to allow or ban slavery would most likely be the cherry on top. Due to the fact that the Missouri Compromise was deemed unconstitutional, the federal government could no longer ban slavery in certain states, therefore allowing for any state to support or ban slavery at will. The problem with this initiative was the fact that there would not be an imbalance in the house and senate due to the unequal influx of free and slave states, which means less state representation.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Nullification Crisis
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Nullification Crisis

    The Nullification Crisis started when South Carolina adopted an ordinance of nullification. This allowed the federal tariff acts of 1828 and 1832 to be labeled unconstitutional and denounced in the state of South Carolina. The state's tilt towards nullification actually started years earlier, during the 1820’s, when the state suffered from an agricultural depression. This caused an estimated 70,000 people to move out of the state, and almost twice that number in the 1830’s. This caused most of the state to blame the tariff.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should The United States Have Become Half-Free Or Half Free Essay
    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should The United States Have Become Half-Free Or Half Free Essay

    Southerners felt that the Federal government was passing laws, such as import taxes, that treated them unfairly. They believed that individual states had the right to "nullify", or overturn, any law the Federal government passed. They also believed that individual states had the right to leave the United States and form their own independent country. Most people in the North believed that the concepts of "nullification" and "states ' rights" would make the United States a weaker country and were against these ideas. (“Causes of Civil War,” 2005)…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Persuasion Essay
    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Persuasion Essay

    Andrew Jackson’s “Proclamation to the people of South Carolina” happend December 10, 1832. Jackson states that “If a single drop of blood shall be shed in South Carolina”,he will hang the first man that he can lay his hands on, from the closets tree. President Jackson was angered because of the changing of laws in South Carolina. The changing of the laws is “Declared invalid” “Two mattered subjects that are different from one another” “The opposite of what the Constitution says” and shall never happen again.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    South Carolina Nullification
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    South Carolina Nullification

    Throughout the great American history, Americans have been through a colossal amount of conflicts, and wars. However, they still figured out a way to compromise and accept each other’s differences. As America improves, they gradually lead to a making of a powerful and organized government. Yet in “South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification” a conflict arises, where South Carolina is furious at the federal government and wants the best for themselves. Like many other states South Carolina is one of which that had its own negative opinions towards the federal government, leading to a larger problem. The document “South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification” both supports and contradicts American and constitutional principles.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Tariff Crisis
    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Tariff Crisis

    Congress passed a high protective tariff on imported, primarily manufactured goods. The south, being predominantly agricultural and reliant on the north and foreign countries for manufactured goods, saw this tariff as an affront to their economy (Wilson). Many southerners blamed their economic problems squarely on the tariff for raising the prices they had to pay for imported goods while their own income shrank. Vice President John C. Calhoun called it a “tariff of abominations” that was meant to favor the north and this tariff led him to pen his “South Carolina Exposition and Protest,” in which he argued that if a national majority acted against the the interest of a regional minority, then individual states could void—or nullify— federal law (Corbett). The theory of nullification, or the voiding of unwelcome federal laws, provided wealthy slaveholders, who were a minority in the United States, with an argument for resisting the national government if it acted contrary to their…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Nullification In The United States
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of Nullification In The United States

    The South Carolina Exposition and Protest of 1828, written by John C. Calhoun, is the most well-known statement of the theory of nullification during this time period. South Carolina, in 1832, initiated to nullify the Tariff of 1828 and 1832, in addition to a consecutive federal act allowing the use of force to enforce tariffs in 1828. South Carolina then implied to ban the administration of these tariff acts within the state. The firm pro-Union stance of President Andrew Jackson brought forth more complaints from leaders of the South. Following the enactment of the Tariff Act of 1832, South Carolina had announced a state convention which had succeed in passing the ordinance of nullification in 1832.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics