The unification of Italy and the unification Germany happened about the same time. Italy was made up of small city-states and Germany was divided as well. The emerging leader in Italy who pushed for unification was a gentleman named Count Camillo Benso de Cavour. In Germany it was a gentleman named Otto Von Bismarck. Cavour and Bismarck had some similar and different methods for unification. Ultimately, Cavour and Bismarck were successful in unifying their own areas.
Count Camillo Benso de Cavour is a very important person in the history of Italy. He was one of the first people to do something about unification. He wasn’t the only one though. Giuseppe Mazzini and Giuseppe Garibaldi had a significant role in the unification of Italy as well. Cavour was the most interesting of the three. Cavour was the chief minister of a small city-state in Italy called Piedmont Sardinia. Unlike Mazzini, he was an advocate of real politik (what can we get done here? Reality of things). The interesting thing about Cavour is he sought to expand the influence of Piedmont Sardinia in Italy; he didn’t necessarily want to unify Italy. As Cavour is expanding Piedmont Sardinia power through Italy, he received help from Napoleon III and gained territories like Lombardi and Milan. He continued to move south through Italy because he feared Garibaldi’s success would weaken the power of Piedmont Sardinia. Garibaldi was a true hero in Italy because he wanted unification. Italian unification is exactly what Garibaldi achieved. Cavour and Piedmont Sardinia invaded the Papal States. They wanted to slow down Garibaldi’s success. Instead of fighting back, Garibaldi simply stepped down. The reason for this was because Garibaldi cared more about Italy being unified than himself being ruler of a unified Italy. Therefore, Italy was in complete control of the king, Victor Emmanuel, of Piedmont Sardinia. Cavour led Piedmont Sardinia throughout Italy and ultimately unified Italy. Complete unification was in 1870 when the French left Rome during the Franco-Prussian war. Cavour and the Piedmonts led a constitutional monarchy in Italy after unification.
Otto Von Bismarck was the leading force in German unification. He was a conservative who was appointed prime minister by William I in 1862. What he really wanted was to become more powerful and create a larger Germany. He wanted a strong monarchy, army and industrial base. He also wanted to diminish liberalism. The establishment of the Zollverein was very significant to his success. It was a group of German states that managed customs and economic policies within their territories. He participated in a series of wars to try and expand his power but also to try and gain allies. In 1867, Bismarck annexed several German states to create the North German Confederation (a form of a new government). This played a big role during the most significant war, the Franco-Prussian war. A dynastic dispute over Spain brought tensions between France and Prussia to a head. Prussia and France started having intense negotiations over the future of Spain. Secretly, Bismarck didn’t want to deal with France, he wanted war. Through propaganda, Bismarck was able to make France declare war on Prussia. The Germans and the Northern German confederation defeated the French at the battle of Sedans. At the Hall of mirrors at Versailles, the new German Empire had been proclaimed in 1871. Bismarck wanted war because he was confident he would be victorious. He knew he would get more territory. Germany got Alsace and Lorraine after they defeated the French. Because the Prussian army was the main military force, they became the German army. Prussia morphed into Germany after unification, but continued to rule the nation.
There are a lot of similarities, and a lot of differences relating to the methods that Cavour and Bismarck used. Both Cavour and Bismarck led a movement towards unification. Both people didn’t set up big nationalistic movements to do so, it just sort of happened. Cavour and Bismarck both started their own movements towards unification after they were appointed high positions for their governments. Other than that, they didn’t have many similarities. Cavour was the type of person who relied on diplomacy. Cavour discussed and planned how to do things, yet never really participated. Bismarck was the complete opposite. Bismarck was the man of the extremely powerful Prussian army. Cavour’s main opponents were the people and Garibaldi. Very few people actually supported Cavour. Cavour also had the Austrians as opponents. Bismarck’s opponents were countries like Austria and France. Cavour had a better location, yet not a ton of power because when Italy was unified, Victor Emmanuel took over. Bismarck had a ton of power but an awful location. The independent states, which are eventually Germany, were located in the middle of super powers of the world and Bismarck had the tough task of unifying all of them.
Cavour and Bismarck were successful in unifying their own areas. Ultimately, Cavour was an opportunist who achieved unification through diplomacy. Bismarck was a very powerful man who played multiple sides throughout the unification of Germany, yet was able to unify it due to the ridiculously powerful Prussian army and the Zollverein. Cavour and Bismarck were great leaders, and they each accomplished something amazing.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Italian unification: Savoy- ruled Piedmont in N Italy = best hope for unification when lead by Count Camillo di Cavour prime minister to Victor Emmanuel II.…
- 1541 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…
- 1527 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
1) nationalism: Germany had just recently been united w/ astria-hungary left out. Italy was recently united as well (not in it's present form though).…
- 1040 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Though some wanted to stick to tradition, there were some important and influential people who encouraged the unification. Giuseppe Mazzini, attorney, believed that Italy deserved to be a nation and it was about time all the parts of the monarchy to be part of one big republic in unification. Along with Mazzini, Carlo Cattaneo, philosopher and political activist, also believed in the unification of this monarchy would be a right step for Italy. He said that even though it would mix them, it won’t take their culture and traditions off the grid like they believed, but instead, they would all be appreciated and remembered. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest of Piedmont stated that the unification would actually make the kings stronger without damaging their own independence.…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Congress of Vienna, held after Napoleon's exile to Elba, aimed to sort out problems in Europe. Delegates from Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia (the winning allies) decided upon a new Europe that left both Germany and Italy as divided states. Strong nationalist elements led to the re-unification of Italy in 1861 and Germany in 1871. The settlement at the end of the Franco-Prussian war left France angry at the loss of Alsace-Lorraine to Germany and keen to regain their lost territory. Large areas of both Austria-Hungary and Serbia were home to differing nationalist groups, all of who wanted freedom from the states in which they lived.…
- 440 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…
- 632 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Many similarities exist between German fascism, or Nazism, and Italian fascism. For example, both fascist movements were brought into power after facing very similar problems. One of the major problems that both countries encountered was a post-war economy teeming with instability. Germany's fragile economy was undermined by widespread unemployment, hyperinflation, and burdensome reparation payments, while Italy's economy was just as delicate. In addition, the Great Depression brought both countries even further into economic collapse. Another problem that brought about fascism in the two countries was post-war peace settlements, especially the Versailles Treaty. While the Germans were exasperated by the exorbitant reparation payments forced upon them by the Allies, the Italians felt betrayed by the peace settlements for denying them the territory and status they deserved. Another problem that the two countries faced was their dissatisfaction with their existing governments. Many Germans were disgruntled with the Weimar Republic for signing the humiliating Treat of Versailles, while many Italians were apprehensive of the chaos within their parliamentary regime. Lastly, widespread fear of revolutionary upheaval and the expropriations of a Communism system also caused many Germans and Italians to identify with fascism.…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Certain motivating political and economic factors enabled Germany to gain its unification in the late nineteenth century. Its economic prosperity from the zollverein, technological advances, and political moves in terms of actions allowed it to ultimately acquire a solid unification by 1871.…
- 281 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Another group of people that was heavily impacted by the effects of nationalism were the Italian people. In 1850, Italy was ruled by many different empires. They were separate states with no unification whatsoever. The Northern regions were richer than the south, and the two areas had nothing in common. Italy had lack of unity, which is shown in the fact that Mazzini wanted a Republic, the Pope wanted a confederation, and Charles Albert wanted a kingdom. When Cavour rose as a prominent nationalist figure in Italy, he used many…
- 623 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…
- 700 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Garibaldi's popularity, his skill at rousing the common people, and his military exploits are all credited with making the unification of Italy possible. He also served as a global exemplar of mid-19th century revolutionary nationalism and liberalism. But following the liberation of southern Italy from the Neapolitan monarchy, Garibaldi chose to…
- 650 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
based in Rome, losing influence over much of Northern Europe. Weakened, the various Italian city-states became vulnerable to conquest by Spain, France, and Austria. Italy remained a patchwork of principalities controlled through proxy by various European powers until the 19th century, when the French leader Napoleon supported the unification of Italy as a way of creating a buffer state against his many enemies. With the backing of France, Italian nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi led a popular movement that took over much of Italy in 1861 and would be ending in 1870 with the fall of Rome and complete unification of the…
- 966 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Compare and contrast the foreign policy goals and achievements of Metternich (1815-1848) and Bismarck (1862-1890)…
- 1023 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This movement is one example of how a movement that also shows nationalism characteristics can create unification among Italy. The Congress of Vienna and the end of Napoleonic rule lead to a nationalism increase for Italy. This increase brought unity because the people starting feeling as though they had a say in what was happening instead of having one person make all the decisions. This group and the end of this rule demonstrates how there can be a unity increase coming from any sort of source. Finally, in March 1861, a parliament of all of Italy except Rome and Venetia, agreed on unifying Italy with Victor Emmanuel as its first king.…
- 640 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
My primary goal in applying to Walden University for Ph.D. program is to prepare myself for a future career in forensic human services administration. Interested in furthering the current body of research and in improving techniques used on the study of the theoretical foundations of organizational behavior and the practice of management and planning. I am very committed to pursuing human services administration and I believe Walden University Ph.D. program will provide me with an excellent foundation in the area of organizational management and planning. With a Ph.D., I will be well prepared to lead a very promising career. While I have no doubt that the program will push me to my limits, I am confident that I can face the rigorous challenges posed by graduate study and thrive under the demanding environment that advanced studies entail.…
- 1249 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays