Preview

"Cavour United Italy Not Because He Wanted to or Intended to, but Because Circumpstances Forced Him to". to What Extent Do You Agree?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1090 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
"Cavour United Italy Not Because He Wanted to or Intended to, but Because Circumpstances Forced Him to". to What Extent Do You Agree?
Cavour was from Piedmont, which was a state in northern Italy still under the control of the Habsburg in the XIXth century. Because he was from the northern, european, civilized Italy states, it is questionable wether or not he wanted to create one nation along with the southern, more african-like, uncivilized Italy states. However, it can be shown that Cavour did want a unification of some sort for Italian states. To unify a nation to form a single state, a very strong nationalism is needed, which he showed by creating a local newspaper in 1847 bearing the name of the Italian unification movement (Il Risorgimento), as well as by causing a war with Austria jsut to get a free Italy. He also created a youth movement called the young Italy. So we know Cavour truly wanted to unify Italy. However, as stated before, there was a very strong discrimination between the North and the South of Italy. Therefore, it is hard to believe that a nationalist diplomat from Piedmont would want to include the illiterates from the south. Thus we can consider that Cavour did want to unify Italy, but what he tought of as Italy in this case was the Northern part of it, no more to the south than Naples. However, Cavour was aware that Italians wouldn't be able to unify Italy alone. At first, he asked the Pope for help, but he couldn't go against the Austrians, as they had a huge christian population. So he asked for help to the French Emperor, Napoleon III. At first, he didn't reply, but when an Italian nationalist attezmpted to murder him, he suddenly felt like he had to help the Italians. It is suspected that one of the reason (other than the fear of being assassinated) that made him help the Italians was that his goal was to shake the balance of power in Europe so that France could make a comeback. Napoleon III and Cavour then held a secret meeting in Plombière where they came up with a plan. Cavour would provoke the Habsburg ruling over Piedmont by making liberal changes,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Italian unification: Savoy- ruled Piedmont in N Italy = best hope for unification when lead by Count Camillo di Cavour prime minister to Victor Emmanuel II.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though some wanted to stick to tradition, there were some important and influential people who encouraged the unification. Giuseppe Mazzini, attorney, believed that Italy deserved to be a nation and it was about time all the parts of the monarchy to be part of one big republic in unification. Along with Mazzini, Carlo Cattaneo, philosopher and political activist, also believed in the unification of this monarchy would be a right step for Italy. He said that even though it would mix them, it won’t take their culture and traditions off the grid like they believed, but instead, they would all be appreciated and remembered. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest of Piedmont stated that the unification would actually make the kings stronger without damaging their own independence.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria's attempts to suppress uprising in Italy in areas that Austria controls initially had to deal with the French forces supporting the uprisings.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unification of Italy Dbq

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Those who agreed that Italy should be unified argued that Italy would not survive in the separated states, would be vulnerable to invasions, and would ultimately be weaker overall. Giuseppe Mazzini, an attorney who was exiled from Piedmont and wanted Italy to be unified so that he could return to his home said, “Unity, because without unity there can be no true nation, and without unity there is no strength.” (DOC 1) People for unification believed the combining of Italy states would be beneficial in the end. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest from Piedmont, said, “The benefits Italy would gain from a political confederation under the moderating authority of the pontiff are beyond enumeration…would increase the strength of the various princes without damaging their independence; it would remove the causes of disruptive wars and revolutions at home, and make foreign invasions impossible. (DOC 3) Some civilians of these states also agreed that the unification of Italy would be just fine. Jessie White Mario, an English journalist who is obviously an opinionated individual being in the field of journalism said, “…Italy would have been free from foreigners, would have been free, independent, and united, had not monarchy stepped in and substituted the petty longings of dynastic ambition for the great national aim.” (DOC 9) On the other hand, some people felt that the unification of Italy would not bring success, but failure.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    who he refers to as countrymen and friends to obtain their trust so that he could go on with his grand scheme to revenge Caesars death against the conspirators.…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” (Reference to other speech) I, Marc Anthony, Caesar’s right hand man have come to you today to speak about a problem facing the community of Rome. Sadly, Caesar, our glorious leader, has gone up to the gods. In result of this we need a new leader before our city descends into chaos and destruction. I can help to return peace and overflowing prosperity to the city of Rome and Italy. As you all know Caesar died prematurely to the bloody hands of conspirators who have infiltrated what we call home. I saw Caesar die at the hands of such traitors, so these conspirators must be killed in vengeance. Without these conspirators stopped, our beloved city will be unable to continue on its gracious path.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nationalism DBQ

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another group of people that was heavily impacted by the effects of nationalism were the Italian people. In 1850, Italy was ruled by many different empires. They were separate states with no unification whatsoever. The Northern regions were richer than the south, and the two areas had nothing in common. Italy had lack of unity, which is shown in the fact that Mazzini wanted a Republic, the Pope wanted a confederation, and Charles Albert wanted a kingdom. When Cavour rose as a prominent nationalist figure in Italy, he used many…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius vs Brutus

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Brutus joined the conspiracy against Caesar, he did it solely for the good of Rome. Unlike all the other men, Brutus justified his motive for murder: Brutus feared that Caesar would alter his attitude when he was crowned emperor: "He would be crown'd/ How that might change his nature..." (II,i,12-13). Brutus was afraid of the possibility of a negative change in Caesar that could doom Rome.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    based in Rome, losing influence over much of Northern Europe. Weakened, the various Italian city-states became vulnerable to conquest by Spain, France, and Austria. Italy remained a patchwork of principalities controlled through proxy by various European powers until the 19th century, when the French leader Napoleon supported the unification of Italy as a way of creating a buffer state against his many enemies. With the backing of France, Italian nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi led a popular movement that took over much of Italy in 1861 and would be ending in 1870 with the fall of Rome and complete unification of the…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hated by some loved by others. Girolamo savonarola, was viewed from different perspective, from being a saint to a tyrant. Some people believe he had done some great things for italy such as implementing new rules, but not all of his rules were fair to everyone, making them think savonarola was a tyrant. Half of the population of florence thought he was of great help to them and that without him they would not be as successful as they were or that they would not have somewhere to live without him. While others thought he had made unfair rules/laws that were only for his own well being or his giant ego.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    JULIUS CAESAR outline

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3.- Cassius obviously wants Brutus to join the conspiracy against Caesar, but instead of coming right out and asking him, he tries to increase Brutus's ego by suggesting that the people wants for Brutus to lead Rome.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    promises to him as a conspirator and to the “loyalty” to Rome. He asks “ Brutus and Caesar what…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics