Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

CCOT Rome

Good Essays
509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CCOT Rome
During Rome’s long history, it changed politically in many ways. It grew from a small settlement on the Tiber River to a massive empire over the centuries. There were many changes in Rome’s political system over the years, such as its changes in its religious policies, governmental structure, and leadership. These changes were likely caused by Rome’s change from republic to empire, vastly changing the government. However, there were also several continuities. These included the use of provincial governors, the Roman legal system, and patriarchal, patrician dominance of politics.

From its founding in the eighth century BCE to its western collapse in 476 CE, Rome’s governmental structure changed considerably. After a brief period of monarchy, the Roman Republic was established. The republic rules for several centuries, ruling by the voice of the people. Senators represented the interested of Roman citizens. However, with the reign of Caesar, this changed. Rome became an empire ruled by a single emperor. His dictatorial rule was imposed upon the people without their consent, starkly different from the elected representatives of the republican era. Later, Diocletian decided to split the empire, causing two separate political entities to develop; the Western and Eastern Roman Empires. This destroyed Rome’s original unified imperial structure and gave it a more regional character. The strength of the bold empire was lost. Also, Roman political attitudes toward religion changed during its history. Traditionally, Rome was pagan, with most worshipping a polytheistic religion sponsored by the state. Later, Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity, and Rome became a Christian empire. This was much different from the pagan beliefs of long ago. In addition, women gained a few rights during the imperial era, granted by politicians in the government. They had more commercial rights and freedoms than their republican predecessors.

While Rome’s political system did indeed change, some facets of Roman politics endured. The military continued to be an important part of Roman government during both the republic and empire. Military leaders often rose to high positions. Law and trials also remained important parts of the political system. The Roman legal system stood strong, with traditions like the Twelve Tables during the Roman Republic and Justinian’s Code much later in the Eastern Roman Empire. During both the republic and empire, Rome used governors and native rulers to oversee their far-off territories. An element of decentralization was thus preserved through this provincial government system. While women did gain a few rights over time, Roman politics were still heavily patriarchal. In the republic and the empire, only men could serve in public office or other political positions. The landowning upper class, the patricians, dominated throughout Roman history, holding most of the power.

Clearly, Rome’s political system had several continuities, seen in its overall patriarchal dominance, provincial governorship, and tradition of law. However, there were many elements of Rome that changed over the years, including political voice of the people, leadership structure, and state religious policies. These changes were caused by Rome’s growth from republic to empire.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discuss the political and economic changes and continuities that occurred as Rome went from a Republic to an Empire…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 100 to 600 CE, the Roman Empire experienced a number of political and cultural changes and continuities. While Rome experienced political change in terms of the impact of Christianity on the Roman government, patriarchy continued politically as the mainstay of the Roman governmental and law systems.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fall Of Rome Dbq Essay

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman empire, what is now modern day Italy, was one of the largest and most powerful empires of the ancient world. Their accomplishments shaped politics, religion, and culture around the world. However, when the empire started to decline, Diocletian split the empire into western Rome and eastern Rome in 200 A.D.. While eastern Rome continued to thrive, western Rome collapsed in 400 A.D.. There were many reasons to why western Rome collapsed including military, economy, and religion. First, there were loyalty problems in the military. The economy was also down because of labor shortages. Finally, a new religion was spreading, which changed the morals of Rome.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    FRQ #1

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The changes Rome experienced were due to the empires internal and external conflicts. A shifting in religious practices and beliefs amongst citizens in which Christianity was part caused the internal conflicts. The spreading of diseases and the ruler/representatives inability to rule the whole empire caused the external conflicts. With the rise of barbarism, the empire no longer saw itself as encompassing the entire world as it once did but instead saw itself as an island civilization in the world of barbarism. In around 280 C.E. the Roman Empire split into the East and West under Diocletian. Power moved eastward and the Byzantine Empire formed. Also, by the fourth century the social structure in the Roman Empire changed. Patrician was no longer considered a class; instead they used the caste system.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Struggles

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Between the approximate times of 44 BC and 29 BC Rome went through a rather extravagant change of management following the assassination of Julius Caesar. Julius Caesar was a Triumvir in the first Roman Triumvirate, and he made great strides in the direction of modern systems of government, with the election of certain power figures, and having the first written law. However, even though many people loved the actions of Caesar, some still resented him. So this led to conspirators gathering support and assassinating Julius Caesar. However, Rome changed more after Caesar fell than when Caesar was influencing the decisions made.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome 100-600

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A huge change politically was the division of the Roman Empire into east and west. There were extreme economic issues and battles both internally and externally. During this time, most of the emperors were weak and there were many disputes over who was next in line for the throne. Germanic tribes took advantage of the chaos and tried to take over land to the east and west. Rome had to split their forces in order to fight them, dividing the empire. Another reason for the division was that the Roman Empire was so vast that there were too many different ideas on how to run the empire and it was impossible to make everyone happy, thus dividing the empire.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think Rome was an Empire under the Republic. Differences were the forms of government. In the Republic the people had voting rights and would elect the officials, the Republic was a system based on the rule of law, and a cleverly balanced constitution that was not a written document, but consisted of an accord between the 3 elements, democracy, monarchy, and oligarchy. On the other hand the Empire or Principate, a system based on an emperor. One man had total, absolute power. In the republic there was a collective form of government; in the Principate it was a one man rule (Emperor). Both the Roman Republic and Roman Empire had periods of instability which ultimately caused their demise. Interestingly, each lasted for almost the same amount of time, so it would be difficult to ascertain one as more "successful" than the other. The Roman Republic controlled most of the Italian Peninsula and soon spread into the Mediterranean, they came in conflicts and things started getting hard. Although the dying republic was ruled for a short time by the famous triumvirate; it soon collapsed with the death of Crassus and Julius Caesar became the first Roman Emperor. The Empire itself lasted no longer than the Republic, but its territorial gains were considerably more extensive. The Empire extended to Britain in the West, and to the banks of the Rhine and Danube Rivers in the East. It encompassed vast numbers of people and thereby spread Roman culture throughout Western Europe. The empire was brought about largely by Caesar who was a man of the people and rose on a popularist platform of protecting the citizens rights against the greed of the senate and redistributing wealth.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome a. Definition of citizenship changed over time b. Pragmatic innovation and adaptation as empire's ideals c. Common language was Latin C. Patterns of imperial expansion 1. Both consolidated their power within their environmental limits using a common legal framework 2. They had different patterns of development, types of public servants, and government practices 3.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 500 BCE and 500 CE, the Roman civilization experienced changes both politically and culturally. Firstly, Rome’s government transitioned from a Republic to an Empire. Later, that empire was split into two parts; east and west. In terms of changes in culture, it was impacted by the shift in religion, as the Romans shifted from polytheism to monotheism. Despite all the changes, Rome still remained culturally diverse.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • How was the Roman Republic governed and how did that government shape the Western political tradition?…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rome 100-600 Ce

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As I mentioned there are many changes in this time period, one being the destruction of paganism and the acceptance of Christianity in the Roman empire. Roman influence in Europe began to disintegrate, especially after the division of the empire. The East transformed into the Byzantine empire, a mixture of Greek, Roman , and Persian culture. The West was overtaken and ruled by barbarians. Although the empire split, the power of the emperor still grew, and by 600 CE he was considered above the law, and so the Roman Senate was abolished since all the authority and decision-making power lied with the emperor and his advisors. Rome soon changed from a Republic into an absolute monarchy. Many wars and internal conflicts in both the east and west led to this major political change in government. Another major political change had to do with Rome’s declining economy. The economy collapsed drastically, with people deserting cities looking for work, peasants selling themselves to landowners to survive, and no taxes paid especially from the middle class led for an extremely weak and collapsing authority. Trade and production declined, cities shrank, and population decreased.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Roman Government

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Roman government changed from a republic to an empire, this doesn’t seem an easy task for modern day governments. How was it that this occurred? And what impact did Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar have on this change? Julius Caesar, although not completely starting the process, this was begun be Sulla, Caesar did draw the power away from the senate and bestowed it upon himself, partaking in constant wars, instead of stabilising the republic. When he died, Rome fell back into civil war and power was regained by Julius Caesar’s heir, Augustus. Augustus continued drawing Rome away from a republic, as was his only option if Rome was to survive. He was almost completely unchallenged once he took power as his opponents were dead from the war. He began rebuilding the nation and restored it to its prior capacity and further. Caesar was the overall catalyst for the reform and Augustus simply continued with that legacy.…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics