Psychologists have come to a general consensus that the way a child is raised has an immense impact on how they are to behave sexually in the future (Hubble 1958; Spanier 1977; Thigpen and Fortenberry 2007). Benjamin Karpman, a Northwestern sexual psychopathy researcher, in his paper The Sexual Psychopath …show more content…
Misunderstanding Humbert and/or Lolita as sexual freaks is a gross oversimplification as they are illustrated as extremely curious individuals who lack dialogue with their parental units. Lolita’s mother lost in “her blind faith in the wisdom of her church” (Nabokov 50) fails to coach Lolita sexually with “sound religious training” (Nabokov 55) and Humbert’s suddenly cut off relationship with Annabel and missing father figure, show that their habits of seeking out replacement figures for lost love or parental figures is a manifestation of an emotionally damaged childhood. In a typical pedophilic relationship, there is a clear distinction between who is the victim and who is the victimizer. In Lolita this power dynamic is missing and both Lolita and Humbert are shown to be the victimized and victimizers. At first, readers sympathize with Lolita because Humbert is portrayed as a power hungry, dominant man, “I was…an exceptionally handsome male…I could obtain at the snap of my fingers any adult female I chose” (Nabokov 16). However, once Lolita realizes that Humbert is in love with her, she uses this power to manipulate him to no