Preview

Centralization vs Decentralization

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9770 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Centralization vs Decentralization
Centralization versus Decentralization: Risk Pooling, Risk Diversification, and Supply Uncertainty in a One-Warehouse Multiple-Retailer System
Amanda J. Schmitt Lawrence V. Snyder
Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA, USA

Zuo-Jun Max Shen
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research University of California Berkeley, CA, USA

May 27, 2008
ABSTRACT We investigate optimal system design in a One-Warehouse Multiple-Retailer system in which supply is subject to disruptions. We examine the expected costs and cost variances of the system in both a centralized and a decentralized inventory system. We show that using a decentralized inventory design reduces cost variance through the risk-diversification effect, and that when demand is deterministic and supply may be disrupted, a decentralized inventory system is optimal. This is in contrast to the classical result that when supply is deterministic and demand is stochastic, centralization is optimal due to the risk-pooling effect. When both supply may be disrupted and demand is stochastic, we demonstrate that a risk-averse firm should typically choose a decentralized inventory system design.

1

Introduction

As supply chains expand globally, supply risk increases. Classical inventory models have generally focused on demand uncertainty and established best practices to mitigate demand risk. However, supply risk can have very different impacts on the optimal inventory management policies and can even reverse what is known about best practices for system design. In this paper, we focus on the impact of supply uncertainty on the One-Warehouse MultipleRetailer (OWMR) system, and compare two policies: centralization (stocking inventory at the warehouse only) and decentralization (stocking inventory at the retailers only). While most research 1

on the OWMR model allows inventory to be held at both echelons, we allow inventory to be held at only one echelon in order to



References: [1] V. Agrawal and S. Seshadri. Risk intermediation in supply chains. IIE Transactions, 32:819– 831, 2000. [2] S. Axsater. Inventory Control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, first edition, 2000. [3] Y. Bassok and R. Akella. Ordering and production decisions with supply quality and demand uncertainty. Management Science, 37(12):1556–1574, Dec. 1991. [4] E. Berk and A. Arreola-Risa. Note on “Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models”. Naval Research Logistics, 41:129–132, 1994. [5] R. Bollapragada, U.S. Rao, and J. Zhang. Managing two-stage serial inventory systems under demand and supply uncertainty and customer service level requirements. IIE Transactions, 36:73–85, 2004. [6] R. Bollapragada, U.S. Rao, and J. Zhang. Managing inventory and supply performance in assembly systems with random supply capacity and demand. Management Science, 50(12):1729– 1743, Dec. 2004. [7] X. Chen, M. Sim, D. Simchi-Levi, and P. Sun. Risk aversion in inventory management. Operations Research, 55(5):828–842, 2007. [8] S. Chopra, G. Reinhardt, and U. Mohan. The importance of decoupling recurrent and disruption risks in a supply chain. Naval Research Logistics, 54(5):544–555, 2007. [9] L.Y. Chu and Z.J.M. Shen. A power-of-two ordering policy for one warehouse, multi-retailer systems with stochastic demand. Working paper, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2006. [10] M. Dada, N. Petruzzi, and L. Schwarz. A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(1):9–32, 2007. [11] L. Eeckhoudt, C. Gollier, and H. Schlesinger. The risk-averse (and prudent) newsboy. Management Science, 41(5):786–794, May 1995. [12] G.D. Eppen. Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Management Science, 25(5):498–501, May 1979. ¨ ¨ [13] Guilliermo Gallego, Ozalp Ozer, and Paul Zipkin. Bounds, heuristics, and approximations for distribution systems. Operations Research, 55(3):503–517, 2007. [14] A. Grosfeld-Nir and Y. Gerchak. Multiple lotsizing in production to order with random yields: review of recent advances. Annals of Operations Research, 126:43–69, 2004. [15] H. Gurnani, R. Akella, and J. Lehoczky. Supply management in assembly systems with random yield and random demand. IIE Transactions, 32:701–714, 2000. [16] W.J. Hopp and Z. Yin. Protecting supply chain networks against catastrophic failures. Working paper, Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 2006. 27 [17] E. Lystad and M. Ferguson. Simple newsvendor heuristics for two-echelon distrbution networks. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007. [18] M. Parlar and D. Berkin. Future supply uncertainty in EOQ models. Naval Research Logistics, 38:107–121, 1991. [19] A. Schmitt. Strategic inventory management for supply chains subject to supply uncertainty. PhD Dissertation, Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2007. [20] A.J. Schmitt and L.V. Snyder. Infinite-horizon models for inventory control under yield uncertainty and disruptions. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2007. [21] A.J. Schmitt, L.V. Snyder, and Z.J.M. Shen. Inventory systems with stochastic demand and supply: Properties and approximations. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2008. [22] L.V. Snyder. A tight approximation for a continuous-review inventory model with supplier disruptions. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, September 2006. [23] L.V. Snyder and Z.J.M. Shen. Supply and demand uncertainty in multi-echelon supply chains. Working paper, P.C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2006. [24] C.S. Tang. The impact of uncertainty on a production line. Management Science, 36:1518– 1531, Dec. 1990. [25] B. Tomlin. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Science, 52(5):639–657, May 2006. [26] B. Tomlin and L.V. Snyder. Inventory management with advanced warning of disruptions. Working Paper, Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2007. [27] B. Tomlin and Y. Wang. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 7(1):37–57, 2005. [28] J.A. Van Meighem. Risk mitigation in newsvendor networks: Resource diversification, flexibility, sharing and hedging. Management Science, 53(8):1269–1288, 2007. [29] C.A. Yano and H.L. Lee. Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Operations Research, 43(2):311–334, March-April 1995. [30] P.H. Zipkin. Foundations of Inventory Management. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, Boston, MA, first edition, 2000. 28

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Newsvendor Problem

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The newsvendor model has been used in operations management and applied economics for years to determine optimal ordering quantity under uncertain demand. Perishable goods such as banana and lettuce cannot be carried from one period to another. Managers have to make decision on the inventory level of perishable goods over a very limited period. For example, due to the uncertainty of the demand of the newspaper, the newsboy has to decide how many newspapers to order each day. If he orders too few, he will forgo some profit; if he orders too much, any unsold newspaper left will be worthless at the end of the day. Some nonperishable good like seasonal fashion cloths cannot be sold at the same price when they are carrying from one period to the next. Unsold merchandise at the end of the period is generally sold at a deep discount. In contrast to restocking lettuce or newspaper, which is done daily, this decision would be made once for the selling season. These single-period decision models are called the Newsvendor Problem.…

    • 3089 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McLeod Motors LTD

    • 1142 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cheung, K. L., H. Lee. 1998. Coordinated replenishments in a supply chain with vendor-managed inventory programs. Techinal Report, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ParksU3Discussion Post

    • 563 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As firms reduce carrying costs and make ordering more efficient, just-in-time inventory systems typically have an effect of reducing the number of suppliers, and using suppliers and manufacturers located near each other (Block, Hirt, & Danielsen, 2015, p. 216). However, as our text also suggests, it would be a good idea to have suppliers in other areas to prevent a halt due to unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters. One lapse, can bring the entire process to a halt as businesses may not maintain extra inventory. Less suppliers are need with the system to work, and ensure quality.…

    • 563 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Qrb 501 Week 2

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In today’s economic recession, business owners are constantly looking for opportunities that would enable them to remain competitive through lowering their overhead cost. Kehrer (2010, ¶ 1) explained, “Bloated overhead is one of the major threats to small business competitiveness”. For this reason, it can be determined that business analysts are evaluating the different types of inventory management systems that could be applied to help reduce the cost of overhead and increase product turnaround. “Dell has achieved a system that at times leaves them with average inventories for long enough to last only three days. Instead of incurring holding costs, Dell doesn’t order until the demand is in place” (Atkinson, 2005, ¶6). Dell refers to this system as the Just-In-Time inventory system. The Vendor Managed Inventory system, a concept pioneered by Wal-Mart, is another inventory system that is paving the way for the future with its ability to communicate the demand of the customers directly to the supplier (Wal-Mart’s Focus on EDI, 2010). The summary will briefly describe the Just-In-Time and Vendor Managed Inventory Systems. Following the brief description, will be a comparison that indentifies both the advantages and disadvantages of each inventory system.…

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fireside Tire Company

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Coyle, J., Langley, J.C., Gibson, B.J., Novack, R.A., and Bardi, E.J. (2008). Supply Chain Management: A logistics perspective. South-Western Publishing. Mason, Ohio…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Project Procurement

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With the increased globalization, competition and complexity in global supply chains, more companies have realized that supply chain management is critical to the optimal organizations overall operation. It is not longer just the responsibility of the warehouse manager and logistics director. In the past, many organizations didn’t manage their supply chains they left that up to the suppliers. Usually the supply chain planning, marketing, production and inventory management in most organizations operated as separate departments (Stevenson, 2009). Businesses have recognized the strategic importance and the need for effect and efficient supply chains in operations management (Stevenson, 2009).…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deere Company

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages

    using MIPO, an enterprise-strength application that solves complex stochastic inventory-optimization problems efficiently. It views a supply chain as a discrete-time, stochastic finite-horizon, time-varying, capacitated multistage model. The…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Newman Electric

    • 3491 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Venkateswaran, J. &. (2011). Service levels, system cost and stablity of production inventory control systems. Internation Journal of Production Research, 49(23), 7086-7108.…

    • 3491 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Logistic

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All companies involved in the supply chain want to maximize their respective profits by increasing revenue and decreasing cost. However, companies may employ different strategies in order to achieve this goal. Some of them focus on customer satisfaction and quick delivery, while others may be more concerned about minimizing inventory holding costs.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Risk Pool

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the centralized system 3 retailers have a common warehouse and the Lead time for is only 2 days. So there is no necessity for them to have high safety stock. It will automatically reduce the holding costs and also sharing a warehouse will definitely…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Multi-echelon inventory optimization seeks to minimize the total inventory in all of the echelons of a company 's supply chain. This is more complicated than traditional inventory optimization because of the additional lead times between each echelon, the bullwhip effect, and the need to synchronize orders and control costs between echelons. Companies with this level of complexity in their supply chains musr…

    • 2629 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Risk Pooling

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Risk pooling concept is explained in the case study considering the examples of two warehouses located in Massachusetts and New Jersey. When we inherit Centralized Distribution System (single warehouse for distribution) we can see the benefits of risk pooling, provided there is a negative correlation in the demands for different products in the market. When the demand for two different products varies, we have the inventory to support the demand for a product which is high and so we offset the demand for the other product which is low. This is the primary advantage with risk pooling. But when we can see a demand for both the products to be higher than the average or lower than the average market demand, risk pooling advantages gradually decrease.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. How could a grocery store use inventory to increase the responsiveness of the company’s supply chain?…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    harris

    • 4227 Words
    • 18 Pages

    - 20% that involve maintenance error. Errors can be described as active failures that lead directly to…

    • 4227 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cfrp

    • 99988 Words
    • 400 Pages

    [Kim and Lee, 2005] Kim G.W., and Lee K.Y., 2005, Critical thrust force at propagation of delamination zone due to drilling of FRP/metallic strips, Composite Structures, 69(2), pp…

    • 99988 Words
    • 400 Pages
    Powerful Essays