A Case Study of Diamond Bank Lagos
INTRODUCTION
For a long time, women had to contend with a plethora of challenges in the execution of their duties. The patriarchal nature of the majority societies militates against women to ascend organizational hierarchy. Most organizations are systematically organized for male supremacy; hence, they are not gender neutral. Women find themselves playing second fiddle to men because the core values of patriarchy are male domination and control of the perceived weak groups, which are women.
Female subjugation and marginalization has been reinforced and perpetuated through the process of gender socialization resulting in women domestication. Premised on androcentricism, women’s domestic role is perceived as antithetical to public sphere activities informed by the process of socialization which in turn “elbowed” women out of the educational, political, and macro-economic spheres. Women’s participation in the mainstream economy was confined largely to agricultural production as laborers. They were thus excluded from the full entitlements that patriarchy dutifully extended and delivered to men. They also remained furthest from citizenry, which is equally critical to one’s ability to access and exercise citizenship rights. This translates women into a property-less, right-less and privatized status (McFadden, 1995). While the presence of women in management ushered in some feelings of hope and recognition of women’s capabilities and acceptance of women leadership in society, collective assumptions and male customs, such as aggressiveness, domination, discrimination, and selfishness, which seem to inform and dictate practice in management, implied that ‘women operate in men’s shoes’ since the aforesaid customs and practices are not part of this practice of incorporating women in management with patriarchal core values seems to have made life difficult for
References: Davidson, M.J. & Burke, R.J. (1994). Women in Management: Current Research Issues. London: Paul Chapman Publishers. Ford, E.M. (2000). Do Female MPs Substantively Represent Women? A Study of Legislative Behaviour in Canadian 35th Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 435 – 465. Foucault, M. (2006). History of madness. New York: Routledge. Haralambos, M. & Holborn, M. (2000). Sociology: Themes and Perspectives. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. Korda, M. (1974). Male Chauvinism: How it works. London: Barrie and Jenkins. McFadden, P. (1995). Reflections on Gender Issues in Africa. Harare: SAPES. Menon, L. (1998). Women Empowerment and Challenge of Change. New Delhi: Kanishka Publishers. Oakley, A. (1981). Subject Women. Oxford: Martin Robertson Publishers. O’Donnell, M. (1993). A New Introduction to Sociology. Ontario: Thomas Nelson Publishers.