Jesse Sheidlower does not agree with Simons but he doesn’t disagree either. He states, “No, it is not being ruined. Language is what it is.” He points out the fact that it is technology that is changing language. He believes that language has always been informal to a point but it is the fact that language is becoming informal in publications that is leading people to believe language is in decline. Sheidlower believes that people like Simon’s that believe language is in decline are misguided because “language change happens and there’s nothing you can do about it.” Macneil and Cran wrote this article to appeal to the reader’s emotions because they do not use much evidence to support their ideas instead they use people’s opinions and publications. Some people could consider the several publications mentioned in the article evidence, but to me I believe Macneil and Cran are simply trying to give information on their ideas rather than using specific evidence. I believe that they want to appeal to the reader’s emotions and try to get the reader to see what they believe about language and get the reader thinking about what they might
Jesse Sheidlower does not agree with Simons but he doesn’t disagree either. He states, “No, it is not being ruined. Language is what it is.” He points out the fact that it is technology that is changing language. He believes that language has always been informal to a point but it is the fact that language is becoming informal in publications that is leading people to believe language is in decline. Sheidlower believes that people like Simon’s that believe language is in decline are misguided because “language change happens and there’s nothing you can do about it.” Macneil and Cran wrote this article to appeal to the reader’s emotions because they do not use much evidence to support their ideas instead they use people’s opinions and publications. Some people could consider the several publications mentioned in the article evidence, but to me I believe Macneil and Cran are simply trying to give information on their ideas rather than using specific evidence. I believe that they want to appeal to the reader’s emotions and try to get the reader to see what they believe about language and get the reader thinking about what they might