Preview

Chapter14 DAPM

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4199 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chapter14 DAPM
Chapter 14 Depreciation Allowance (折舊免稅額) – Plant and Machinery

1. Learning Objectives

1.1 Identify assets which are plant or machinery.
1.2 Identify persons who can claim depreciation allowance.
1.3 Identify the type of expenditure that qualifies for the depreciation allowance.
1.4 Compute depreciation allowance under the pooling system.
1.5 Compute depreciation allowance under the non-pooling system.
1.6 Calculate the balancing adjustment that arises when an asset is disposed of.
1.7 Identify prescribed fixed assets.
1.8 Explain the tax treatment of prescribed fixed assets.

2. Definition of Plant (設備, 裝置) and Machinery

2.1 Plant and machinery is not defined in the IRO, so the words must be given their ordinary meaning. There have been numerous cases before the UK courts on the definition of plant.

(A) Functional test

2.2
DEFINITION

In Yarmouth v France (1887) 19 QDB 647, plant was defined as the apparatus (器械, 設備, 儀器) used by a businessman for carrying out his business – not his stock in trade, but all goods and chattels (動產) fixed or movable, live or dead, which he keeps for permanent employment in his business.

2.3 Many tax cases involve the distinction between plant and building. It has been said that plant performs an active function, while the function of a building is passive.

2.4
EXAMPLE 1

In CIR v Barclay, Curle & Co Ltd (1969) 45 TC 221, a dry dock was held to be plant, not a building structure. The dry dock held ships up for repair and was similar to a tool of a trader.

2.5
EXAMPLE 2

The active and passive function test was also illustrated in CIR v Scottish & Newcastle Breweries Ltd (1982) 55 TC 252. In this case, decorations, electric light fittings of hotels, were held to be plant as they carried out the function of creating atmosphere.

(B) Setting (安裝) test

2.6
EXAMPLE 3

In J Lyons & Co Ltd v AG (1944) 1 All ER 477, a distinction was made between the setting in which business was carried out and the apparatus with which the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Minimam Tax Case Study

    • 4464 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The relevant issues are the tax consequences of each of the two proposed transactions for…

    • 4464 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Belmont Finance Corporation Ltd v Williams Furniture Ltd (No 2) [1980] 1 All ER 393…

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    chapter 14

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The painting of An Ideal City (artist anonymous) featured in the chapter illustrates what key aspect of Renaissance urban architecture?…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    chapter 4

    • 2050 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The wall of the alveolus (air sac) in the lung is composed of which type of epithelium? simple squamous epithelium Yes, this single layer of squamous cells is ideal for the diffusion of gases in the lungs.…

    • 2050 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    chapter 14

    • 296 Words
    • 3 Pages

    True or False? Meteorologists often use multiple simulated models, which make different assumptions, to predict the weather.…

    • 296 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    claw 6026 group assignment

    • 2612 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to s40-25 of ITAA 1997, a depreciating asset that used for the purpose of producing assessable income is deductible. ‘A depreciating asset is an asset has a limited effective life and the decrease of value can be reasonably expected over the useful life based on s40-30 of ITAA 1997’. Lands, trading stocks and ordinary intangible assets are not depreciation assets. Bigshoes acquired the competitor’s business could be treated as an expansion of business and the main purpose of this acquisition is to make profit. Three assets are acquired by Bigshoes though this transaction.…

    • 2612 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    It also briefly addresses the applicability of statutory warranties of fitness for purpose and merchantable quality and supports that fitness for purpose and merchantable quality are implied by common law giving reference the test for implication in fact outlined in BP Refinery (Westernport) v Shire of Hastings (1977)[3]…

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lily: “type of plant that grows from a bulb and that has large white or coloured flowers”.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 4

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. What are the guidelines that must be followed by Web designers when creating a Web site that is intended to meet the specific needs of customers?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Unconscionability

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages

    [ 6 ]. Cobbe v Yeoman 's Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 1752 Lord Walker 92…

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter 14

    • 3757 Words
    • 38 Pages

    Our impressions of others are influenced by the amount of information they choose to disclose.…

    • 3757 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 4

    • 3636 Words
    • 12 Pages

    A health system encompasses many areas: perceptions and classifications of health problems, prevention measures, diagnosis, healing, and healers…

    • 3636 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Depreciation Methods

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Depreciation is the accounting process of allocating the cost of tangible assets to expense in a systematic and rational manner to those periods expected to benefit from the use of the asset.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Land Law Test Notes

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. Distinguishing between fixtures and chattels is important when deciding who the legal owner of property is. A fixture is an object which is attached irreversibly to the land, the removal of a fixture would result in the damage of the object. However the description of a describes how a chattel is not fixed it is an independent object resting on the land, and can be removed without causing damage. The distinction between whether an object is a fixture or a chattel is decided based upon to tests, the first “the degree of annexation test”, looks at the degree of the joint between the object and the land. If an object is fixed permanently to the land and removal will cause damage, the object is a fixture as in the case of Holland v Hodgson (1872). However if it is found that the object is merely resting on the land by its own weight then it’s a chattel, as was decided in Hulme v Bingham (1943). The second test “the purpose of annexation” looks at reasons why the object was joint to the land and whether it was placed to improve the property. An example of where distinguishing between a chattel and a fixture could be very important would be during the selling and buying of property or land. The owner looking to sell the property may believe that some objects within the property or on the land are not part of the property and therefore not part of the sale, whilst the buyer may be of the opinion that the object is in fact part of the land and therefore on sale they will become the legal owner. In cases like this is it important to distinguish between the two.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Doctrine of fixtures in property law The doctrine of fixtures is applied to determine if an object is a fixture.1 This common law provides that what is annexed to the land becomes part of the land, “quicquid plantatur solo, solo credit”, and adopts the character of real property.2 For this to transpire all circumstances surrounding the annexation to the land are examined, including but not limited to the degree of annexation and the purpose of annexation.3 Through this both objective and subjective intention are considered to determine if an object is a fixture or a chattel.4 The first object, the rail track, is substantially annexed to the land simply because it is affixed to the “bare earth by means of iron pegs”. 5 Although not impossible to remove, as Hugh did when diverting it for the better use and enjoyment by his daughers, it still is annexed with the outlook that it would remain in place for the longer term.6 In addition when the rail track was initially annexed it was constructed for transportation of the logged trees. This greatly improved the use of the land.7 Even today it provides Hugh’s daughters with an improved use of the land enabling them to “travel around the property”8. This indicates that the rail tracks were intended to remain permanently for the better use and enjoyment of the land and is prima facie a fixture.9 The next object “Grand Central” is best examined in two parts. Firstly as the systems which include the PABX telephone, air conditioning, plumbing and portable generator, and then as the building. All of the systems described would be significantly annexed with some more so than others. Typically the air conditioning unit is annexed to ensure stability, the PABX telephone and plumbing is annexed to keep them in place, and the portable generator may only be lightly annexed if it is affixed at all.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays