After reading many of the selections in the anthology, I found this poem on a Gothic’s “recipe” to be quite true (602). However, in the case of this anonymous writer, he considers all of these characteristics to be negative. I, on the other hand, find it very intriguing that this type of novel developed in a time ruled by writers whose main focus was politics and poetry. Many influential writers including Coleridge and Wordsworth criticized the characteristics, morality, purpose, and significance of these novels; however, I believe many of the features they disliked actually broadened the scope of literature. The Gothic novel was often attacked for being too formulaic. Although the specifics of the plot changed from novel to novel, the characteristics were often similar, which is something that is pointed out repeatedly by the Gothic’s critics. The similarities encountered in the characteristics of these novels include the setting, mystery, and characters to name a few. The setting of this type of novel is usually in a castle of sorts, or in some other mysterious place that produces suspense and terror within the reader. Although these settings were often alike, they “exist to convey the atmosphere” and are used “for ends that are fundamentally psychological” (Hume 286). This characteristic is one that set up the entire feeling of the novel, one of suspense, horror, and mystery. The setting of various novels was not uniform
Cited: Stephen Greenblatt. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006. 582-584. Hume, Robert D., “Gothic versus Romantic: A Revaluation of the Gothic Novel.” PMLA. 84.2 (1969): 282-290. York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006. 263-274.