Preview

Charles I was most to blame for causing the civil war 1642-1645

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
956 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Charles I was most to blame for causing the civil war 1642-1645
“Charles I was most to blame for causing the Civil War, 1642-45”. Do you agree?

Charles I was most to blame for causing the civil war, but parliament didn’t help matters when they wouldn’t help the King. Charles’ bad start to being king didn’t help get trust from his people and other factors contributed to the start of a Civil war.

Charles I had a very bad start as king, he held all the blame at this point, because of his bad start people didn’t trust him much and he also had a stammer and was shy so people thought it would be more likely for him to let a war happen. Charles needed a stronger personality to be able to rule, people disliked Charles even more when he made the Duke of Buckingham chief minister as he was very unpopular and selfish. Things didn’t get any better when Charles married a catholic wife with a strong personality. People feared that as England was protestant, and Charles married a catholic wife, because of her strong personality she might make England catholic. Parliament was partly to blame for the earlier tension as they tried to refuse customs taxes to Charles.

When Charles decided to rule for 11 years without calling parliament this created more tension, putting even more of the blame onto Charles. Without parliament Charles ran out of money so he started bending the rules, he charged ship money, to all countries. When Charles started breaking his own laws more people got annoyed and the tension rose again. An example is when he held trials for people he disliked without using a jury. Everyone thought a king should make the laws but once they are made should obey them. The archbishop of Canterbury started changing the churches to look more beautiful, this angered people because they thought he was gradually and secretly trying to make England catholic. Puritan leaders disliked Laud’s changes so Laud had their ears cut off, branded and then they were put in prison!

In Scotland the puritans were the strongest group and Laud
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Can the Years 1661-67 Be Seen as Succesful for Charles
    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To What Extent Can the Years 1661-67 Be Seen as Succesful for Charles

    The end of the interregnum government heralded Charles II's return to the throne. The period known as the restoration can be argued to have been 'successful' for Charles. However, a successful reign can be distinguished in many ways. At the time one of the most important issues for Charles was trying to create a stable financial and stable settlement after the long period without a Monarch, and to an extent, 'success', can be defined to whether a stable settlement was established. Charles' triumphant, Anglican, State Church was arguably successful as it formed a stable religious settlement, yet on the other hand, it was not what Charles initially wanted. In this way it could be argued that 'success' can be measured to what extent Charles got what he wanted, and how much control he had over his Parliament. A successful reign can also be measured by assessing how well liked Charles was by his people at the time of financial difficulty following the grievances of the Civil War.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ap Euro Review Packet
    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ap Euro Review Packet

    1. Political- One of the causes was Charles’s I unsuccessful attempt to arrest five members of Parliament, known as the Grand Remonstrance, on January 4, 1642. Another cause was who should have the power in the country and inflation forced up prices in all parts of Europe. An effect would be that England became a Commonwealth and a Protectorate. Parliamentary supremacy was another effect.…

    • 1660 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To What Extent Do Monarch Push Or Reject Constitutionalism
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To What Extent Do Monarch Push Or Reject Constitutionalism

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism: Describe and analyze the changes in the role of Parliament in English politics between the succession of James and the Glorious Revolution.
    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism: Describe and analyze the changes in the role of Parliament in English politics between the succession of James and the Glorious Revolution.

    James I was an absolutist ruler who emphasized the divine right of kings and sought to restrain Parliament under his will. Consequently, conflicts were inevitable as James I, and ensuing rulers, often found himself deficient of funds, and Parliament served as the gateway to the money. James I and his successor Charles I called Parliamentary meetings solely to ascertain the issue of funds. During this period, Parliament was rarely called upon and after these debates for money, Charles I and James I completely dissolved the Parliament. I did so because he agreed to admit the illegality of his taxes in turn for funding from Parliament. Afterwards, he abolished the Parliament to pursue his own endeavors. Furthermore, during Charles tenure, the English Civil War took place as a result from the lack of amity between Charles and Parliament. The Scottish invaded England, but Parliament refused to allow Charles to raise an army, because they feared he would abuse his powers and assail English citizens who opposed him. Charles I was eventually defeated and executed by Oliver Cromwell. Following the inadequacy of Cromwell, Charles II rose to power and was keyed the "merry monarch" for his easy-going nature. He imposed the Cabal system, a group of five individuals who handled the political issues of England; the term Cabal stems from the initials of each official member. This system acted as a type of Parliament in its methods of governing. During this period as a whole, it is evident that Parliament often conflicted with the ideals of the ruling monarch.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent do you believe with the view that it was Charles himself who caused the failures of the Personal Rule?
    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent do you believe with the view that it was Charles himself who caused the failures of the Personal Rule?

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “Religion was more important than politics in the failure of King and Parliament to reach a settlement. 1646-1649”, Assess the validity of this statement.
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Religion was more important than politics in the failure of King and Parliament to reach a settlement. 1646-1649”, Assess the validity of this statement.

    In January 1649, King Charles I was executed after being charged with high treason due to political and religious reasons, some of which contributed to his refusal in accepting the peace settlements given to him by Parliament. Charles’ refusal to compromise was supported by the division that had emerged within Parliament on how to fight the civil war between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The main factors of the failure to reach a settlement were religion, politics, Charles’ intransigence, the New Model Army and the emergence of radical ideas; all of which eventually concluded to Charles’ execution.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    how far was buckingham influence on charles the main reason for personal rule
    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages

    how far was buckingham influence on charles the main reason for personal rule

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Far Was Charles Different from His Father in His Beliefs Character and Attitudes?
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Far Was Charles Different from His Father in His Beliefs Character and Attitudes?

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is King Philip's War A Necessary War
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Is King Philip's War A Necessary War

    I believe that the King Philip's War (1675-1676) was not a necessary war. There were many things that went down and made this one of the bloodiest wars along side with the Civil war. The fight was between the Native Americans and the English settlers.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Did Slavery Really Cause The Civil War?
    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    Did Slavery Really Cause The Civil War?

    I had originally thought that the main cause of the Civil War was slavery; however, after my research I now believe the true cause of the Civil War is much more complex. I mostly agree with agree with Holt and his theory that the political crisis caused the Civil War. While reading Holt’s essay I became convinced that slavery alone couldn’t have caused the Civil War because the tension over slavery had existed for so long before the Civil War. It was the destruction of the previous two party system that left the South feeling politically stranded which lead to the Civil War. This viewpoint was supported by my research on Jefferson Davis for the meeting of the minds. Davis felt that the South was losing faith in the political system because…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Research Paper
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil War Dbq Research Paper

    Some historians argue that slavery was the primary cause of the American Civil War. As Robert E. Lee said, “In this enlightened age, there are few I believe, but what will acknowledge, that slavery as an institution is a moral and political evil in any country. It is useless to expatiate on its disadvantages.” I believe the statement that slavery was the primary cause of the American Civil War is true, because slavery was very controversial and became the symbol of disunion.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Essay: The Major Contributing Factors to the Civil War
    • 888 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil War Essay: The Major Contributing Factors to the Civil War

    If asked, most people would blame as the cause of the civil war the issue of slavery. This is understandable; many people in the U.S. at the time were against slavery, going to far as to help runaway slaves escape to the free north. But, while slavery at face value was a major factor, international politics and economics played a major role. Several factors, including the election of Lincoln, the raid on Harper 's Ferry, the Dred Scott decision, and, most importantly, the fugitive slave law, contributed to the growing rift between the North and South and, eventually, the Civil War.…

    • 888 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    what caused the English Civil war
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    what caused the English Civil war

    The third cause related to religion, was in 1637 when Charles demanded that the new English Prayer Book be used in Scottish Churches. This was a big mistake because the Scots were more anti Catholic than the English and many of them were Puritan. This was going to increase the chances of war a big amount. There were riots in Scotland against the new book and Charles was forced to raise an army to fight against the Scots. The English army was defeated by the Scots.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Slavery Was The Primary Cause Of The Civil War Essay
    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Slavery Was The Primary Cause Of The Civil War Essay

    First of all, to make it clear, it is not wrong that slavery was the cause of the Civil War. As John C. Calhoun stated on March 4, 1850, “the subject of slavery would, if not prevented by some timely and effective measure, end in disunion… adopt some measure to prevent so great a disaster, but without success…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Slavery Was The Main Cause Of The Civil War Essay
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slavery Was The Main Cause Of The Civil War Essay

    Those who may say that slavery was the main cause of the Civil War fail to realize that its was many problems that arose before the freedom of slaves was even questioned . Slavery became the topic during the war not before .…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics