in getting a percent yield of 64.54%. When calculating the melting point the range of 98.8˚C- 102.5˚C was found which was close to the literature value of 100˚C. The salt to water ratio in the crystals was determined and came out to be 1:4 or KAI(SO4 )2• 4H2O. Using this ratio the percent error was calculated and came to be -0.650%. During the experiment, after pouring the acid into the substance, cloudiness in the substance occurred. This helped to determine when the substance was able to be taken off the hotplate to cool which was when the substance became clear. Another important change notice was during the recrystallization process which turned the liquid into a slush as it got colder. At the end of the experiment what was left was a solid substance. Throughout the experiment some sources of error occurred through systematic errors and impurities. The hotplate was not hot enough and the ice bad wasn't cold enough. Also the cooling and heating process wasn't long enough which concluded the % error to be negative. Impurities like iron could have been in the aluminum result in inaccurate calculations.
in getting a percent yield of 64.54%. When calculating the melting point the range of 98.8˚C- 102.5˚C was found which was close to the literature value of 100˚C. The salt to water ratio in the crystals was determined and came out to be 1:4 or KAI(SO4 )2• 4H2O. Using this ratio the percent error was calculated and came to be -0.650%. During the experiment, after pouring the acid into the substance, cloudiness in the substance occurred. This helped to determine when the substance was able to be taken off the hotplate to cool which was when the substance became clear. Another important change notice was during the recrystallization process which turned the liquid into a slush as it got colder. At the end of the experiment what was left was a solid substance. Throughout the experiment some sources of error occurred through systematic errors and impurities. The hotplate was not hot enough and the ice bad wasn't cold enough. Also the cooling and heating process wasn't long enough which concluded the % error to be negative. Impurities like iron could have been in the aluminum result in inaccurate calculations.