This lab experiment was conduct and taught based upon the primary instruction and introduction to mixtures. With this lab I was able to determine and execute the proper separation of a mixture of solids through various means, such as evaporation and filtration. Using these techniques presented the separation of different ingredients from a mixture was conducted based upon the usage of individual physical properties of each substance presented in the mixture. .
Observations: Throughout this experiment I noted several things. For example as I was heating the sand I completely forgot to cover the top to prevent splatter. Although I did heat the mixture at a much slower speed, this resulted in a loss of sample, further impacting my overall results and contributing to my percent error totals, as the sand was bubbling and slightly splattered. Also, I noted my stirring rod, along with the other tools used, had a bit of solution attached to them. Although minuet in amount I should have weighed and taken note upon the mass of my materials before and after the procedures.
Data Table 1: Experiment Data
Grams
Percent of mixture
Iron filings
2.2 grams
30.56 %
Sand
1.3 grams
18.06 %
Table salt
1.5 gram
20.83%
Benzoic acid
1.1 gram
15.28 %
Total
6.1 grams
84.73%
Questions:
A. How did your proposed Procedures or flow charts at the beginning of this experiment compare to the actual Procedures of this lab exercise?
B. Discuss potential advantages or disadvantages of your proposed Procedure compared to the one actually used.
C. How would you explain a sand recovery percentage that is higher than the original sand percentage? D. What were potential sources of error in this experiment?
A.) The methods I proposed were highly similar to the instructions used in the labpaq manual. Just as stated in the instructions, I would have used the magnet to separate iron fillings, but I would have thought lastly upon evaporation for the sand separation and used the filter.
B.) A potential disadvantage of simply filtering out the sand, is that fact that the benzoic acid substance, that was not completely dissolved could have too be filtered out. Also in the filtering of iron with the magnet I would have never thought to use a bag.
C.) I could explain a sand recovery percentage that was higher than that of the original sand percentage, as simply a contamination of the other substances left within the sand, such as if the sand were not completely dry as there would still be water that would be included in the measured value, or possibly the benzoic acid?
D.) The potential sources of error found in this experiment could include the was heating the sand I completely forgot to cover the top to prevent splatter, removing the mixture out of the ice before adequate crystallization had occurred,. Possibly having the sand, NaCl, or benzoic acid sticking to the iron, also maybe incomplete drying.
How did your flow diagram for completing the separation compare to what was really done in the experiment? Were there any advantages or disadvantages to performing the separation the way you first thought it out? Discuss these advantages and disadvantages in the context how the approach might affect the measurement of some of the materials you separated.
My flow diagram thought out prior to the conducting of this experiment was carried out well. The methods I proposed were highly similar to the instructions used in the labpaq manual. Just as stated in the instructions, I would have used the magnet to separate iron fillings, but I would have thought lastly upon evaporation for the sand separation and used the filter. I thought it was rather obvious to use the magnet for the iron filings, but really did not have an educated guess for how to separate the rest. A potential disadvantage of simply filtering out the sand, is that fact that the benzoic acid substance, that was not completely dissolved could have too be filtered out. Also in the filtering of iron with the magnet I would have never thought to use a bag. All together these simple differences, although minuet could have greatly altered my results and manipulated the entire data table.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Purpose: The purpose of this experiment was to help the student learn how to separate a mixture of multiple different solids and determine the percentage of each component of the mixture.…
- 685 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this Laboratory experiment, my lab partner Alexander and I were able to understand thoroughly the physical and chemical properties of salt (NaCl) and sand (SiO2). Followed by the right procedure we were able to design and test out the components of both NaCl and SiO2 in order to separate the unknown mixture that we were able to find out about. We were also given the task to provide the percent composition of the mixtures. Therefore, the separation of components among this experiment allowed us to obtain the right numbers for our calculations.…
- 660 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
First remove iron filings with magnet since this is the only substance in the mixture that it is magnetic and will be attracted to a magnet.…
- 453 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of this lab, to use two common laboratory methods to see how mixtures can be separated based on physical properties, was fulfilled. The results were then used to see which M&M contained yellow #5 and to separate sand and salt from a mixture.…
- 721 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1. What two factors did you investigate in you procedure, and why did you choose to compare these two factors?…
- 367 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I proposed a magnet would be the used to remove the iron from the mixture.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Each substance was observed inside their containers and the hypotheses were based on these observations. The volumes of each substance was then measured inside their containers. Each substance was then weighed and density calculated. After, each substance was observed under magnifying glass, smelled and touched to determine texture. Lastly, each substance was tested for solubility.…
- 600 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
B. Which unknowns are you confident that you correctly identified? What specific test was crucial in this…
- 2444 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. Crystals on the beaker and in the sand after decantation. Which may make the mass of the sand higher than it should be. Also on the glass stirring rod. Should have weighed the glass rod before and after the procedure.…
- 868 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
• Sketch a design for your separating mixtures device. Label each part of your device with the object name and briefly describe what is occurring at that point. This part of your project does not have to be typed, but remember to write legible!…
- 983 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
a. Read through intro material and record your hypothesis for “Experiment 1: Modeling the Water Cycle” on the Lab 5 Reporting…
- 2956 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
After the liquid was removed, the solid wasn’t as silky and it was more like normal sand. I also discovered the “rocks” were actually clumps of this substance. ANOTHER thing I discovered was white/clear grains. Yes, it was a salt! That means there’s only one way to separate this stuff: dissolve and filter. I poured water onto the rest of the mixture and stirred it up for a solid minute or so. After that, I poured the water into a funnel lined with filter paper which dripped down into another cup. This left me with only the tan sand. First I tried smelling it. It had a REALLY strong smell. Secondly, I recalled it being in the alcohol with a few particles floating around. This got me to believe it was slightly soluble in alcohol. Finally, I tried testing solubility in water. It just floated at the top without any particles floating around in the water, so it wasn’t soluble in water. Due to these factors, I determined it was…
- 821 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Several things could go wrong with this experiment. I think the hardest part and biggest source of error is extracting each substance from the mixture and weighing it by itself. You have to be careful to extract each substance correctly or you will get the wrong weight.…
- 280 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
3. How will you use the investigation screen to test your hypothesis? What steps will you follow? What data will you record?…
- 509 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Iron (FE) is a metallic element which makes up roughly 5% of the earth’s crust. Iron is mined vastly throughout Australia in many different areas including Tasmania, South Australia, Western Australia and Victoria. Australia is one of the world’s major iron ore producers, producing 393.9 Mt in 2009 alone, valued at roughly $30 billion. Iron serves many different purposes but it main use is to produce steel, steel is known to be the most useful metal being used 20 times more than any other metals found in the earth’s crust, therefore making the demand for fine quality iron ore extremely high. Iron ore is any form of rock in which iron can be economically extracted from. The iron within the rock comes in two main forms of iron oxides: magnetite and hematite. The three primary sources iron ores found within the earth’s crust are banded iron formations, magmatic magnetite ore deposits and hematite ore. The hematite and magnetite is physically extracted from the iron ore by using a fairly straightforward process of coarse crushing, fine crushing, classification, dry magnetic separating, floatation, thickening then drying. This process is known as dry magnetic separation.…
- 1513 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays