Preview

Cherokee Should Be Forced To Leave

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cherokee Should Be Forced To Leave
The United States was trying to force the Cherokee to leave their land, when they should not be forced to leave at all. They were given two options to either stay or leave, but they did not know what to do. People think the Cherokee need to leave because their land was blocking the path for them to expand, but they did risk death if they did leave. The Cherokee should stay and fight for their land because it was given to them from their forefathers as a gift.
The Cherokee should be able to stay because the government said that the land belonged to them and their fathers before them. From the letter it said,“These governments perfectly understood our right to the land and our right of self-government.” and “Our fathers gave it to us as their children.” The Cherokee did not want to give up their land because they had owned the land for generations and the government knew this. The land belonged to them first and they have the right to stay there and not be forced to leave.
…show more content…
In the document it writes, “When the white man came to the shores of America, they found our ancestors in peaceful possession of this land.” and “You will slow down or even stop our progress in becoming civilized and in learning the christian religion.” The Cherokee owned thisland long before the white men had and felt as if they should not have to give it up. If the Cherokee were removed they would lose most of their progress. The Cherokee deserve to keep the land because they have lived there for their entire lives, and were trying to fit in with white

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For centuries, the Cherokee People lived peacefully in the mountainous regions of what is now called North and South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and Kentucky. In the book, 'The Trail of Tears', Dennis Brindell Fradin simply tells the story of how this Native American Tribe was systematically robbed by the government of the United States of America of its lands, its culture, and its…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780’s the US began urging the Cherokees to stop hunting and their traditional ways of life and to instead learn about how to live, farm, and worship like Christian Americans. Despite everything the white people in Georgia and other southern states that abutted the Cherokee Nation refused to accept the Cherokee people as social equals and urged their political representatives to take the Cherokees land. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803 gave Thomas Jefferson the chance to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author who wrote the article is the son of the woman who started the Association of American Indian Affairs (AAIA). They emphasized that his mother was a white female, a white woman leading the AAIA. The AAIA was a white-based organization that developed around the same time the Congress for American Indians was formed by the First Nations of America. I am not sure whom the author is speaking about but they say the AAIA want Indian tribes to place mechanisms to prohibit discrimination, guarantee civil right, protect, religious freedom, and require free elections. This is the problem with the Europeans who came to this land and took over. They come to a land where they never been before and start making the rules, as if they owned the land.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Trail of Tears was a harsh and inhumane event that happened in the 1830’s. Indian tribes were forced off of their land and they were involuntarily relocated to what is now Oklahoma. There was fear and resentment among the white settlers when it came to their Native American adversaries. They were a different kind of people than the whites when it came to how they lived, spoke, dressed and as well as their religious beliefs. This unfamiliarity with them led to the settlers believing that they were better than the indians and that they should leave the land and be forced to live in an ‘indian land’ if they refused to conform to Christianity as well as learn to speak English. However as more and more settlers flooded into the area, the land became more and more coveted. They no longer cared how civilized the indians became; they wanted them gone (Brief History of the Trail of Tears).…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The cherokee was the last to move and one reason they didn’t want to leave is because the other tribes that went to the Indian territory got their horses taken and people died from diseases. The place had a lot of land for the people probably because everyone who lived there moved because of thieves. In the eyes of the Americans, the Indians should be thankful that we even gave them land. In the Indians eyes again, why kick us out and give us junk land because we won’t want to move.…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many events that led up to the removal of the Eastern Cherokee in the early-to-mid 19th century. However, it all really begins in 1830. Major Ridge was discussing treaties regarding selling land to the U.S. Government. The Cherokee believed that lived in their own sanctuary, their paradise, and that their ancestors had always lived here. Major Ridge felt if he could die to preserve his people land’s he would gladly do so. The Cherokee picked the wrong side during the American Revolution which caused American soldiers to desecrate Cherokee lands. He did not wish that same tragedy amongst his people. President Jefferson believed that eventually through cultural assimilation the Indian people and Americans would become one and we would…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indian Removal Policy

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There were several moral aspects of moving the Indians that were brought up during this time. The Secretary of War, William H. Crawford, said, “Intrusions upon the lands of the friendly Indian tribes, is not only a violation of the laws, but in direct opposition to the policy of government towards its savage neighbors…” while he was talking to some military commanders (Document G). He was trying to get the point across that it was morally wrong to remove the Indians from the lands that they have lived on for so long, especially since they had not done anything to justify the actions that the American Government were attempting to take against them. There was a collection of photographs from the Georgia Historical Society that contained a picture of the Vann House, built by James Vann who was a Cherokee leader of mixed blood. His estate was beautiful and very well built. It showed the intelligence of the Indians and that they were not all primitive like some would believe (Document L).…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early 1800s, White settlements were expanding westward. This threatened the Cherokee land which was located in the Southeastern part of the United States. This left the Cherokee with a big decision to make for their entire tribe. Would they relocate West ,or stay for the White settlements to invade where they call home. After all, the Cherokee had owned the land for over 10,000 years. It was not the United States’ land to take. This is why many of the Cherokee Nation felt the need to stay. Others wanted to move because they felt that if they did not, then the United States territory would override the Cherokee customs and they would have to follow United States laws. Clearly the best chance of survival for the Cherokee was to stay in…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How Did America Stolen?

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The act was heavily protested by the Cherokee Indians and even went to the Supreme Court, but the Cherokees were declined because they were not citizens of the U.S. Jackson proposed that the Indians give their territory to the U.S. government in exchange for $5 million and new territory out west, the Cherokees didn’t take it, which sparked the infamous trail of tears. This is an example of how a nation is conquered, the people were offered a great deal, didn’t take it, and were punished and the place is taken. It’s not fair, but that is how nations…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In first reason they should move is because that the U.S. government will give those Cherokees more than 700,000 squares miles of land in Louisiana Territory for Indians their is bigger than the entire state in the Georgia. and it is estimated that there are no more than 50,000 Indians in the southwest so that means they…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government didn't give them options; basically gave them land Oklahoma and told them to move there. The Cherokee refused to leave which is exactly what I would have done. The Cherokees wanted to continue on with the traditions of their ancestors. They wanted to live on the land of their ancestors,…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Essay

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When entering a new territory, the Cherokees did not just have a conflict with the Native Americans who already lived there but the Cherokees also had to handle the Old Settlers which is a group of Cherokees who moved west in 1835. To demonstrates, “When John Ross arrived at his new homeland, he found himself struggling with the Old Settlers,” (Elish [Page 28]). This shows that, even after the long and difficult journey walking to Oklahoma, the Cherokees still had a hard time surviving. It is important to realize that after the Treaty of New Echota was signed and the Old Settlers had moved away, the tension between the Cherokees and the Old settlers hasn’t stopped. To illustrate, Elish states, “There was genuine threat of Cherokees civil war,” (Page 86). This is significant because their disagreement was so awful that they had to solve it by having a war. In this shows that, after the war ended many Native Americans certainly did not survive, the population was already reducing but after the war, many lives have lost, even more. Therefore, it was not just the Trail of Tears that killed thousands of Cherokees there were other tough challenges the Cherokees had to face…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    trail of tears

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To begin with, I believe the Trail of Tears was a very tragic event that happened to the Natives. For example, most Indians were imprisoned in stockades. They had low amount of food and beds. Disease also spread. Not only did the Indians face hardships in stockades, but also on their journeys to their new land, known as the Indian Territory. On their journeys, Natives also faced disease, starvation, and exposure. Another example is how many Indians died on their journeys or in their stockades. About 2,000-5,000 Natives died due to the hardships they faced: disease, starvation, and exposure. Last but not least, the Indians lost their land. The Indians were on the land first; the land belonged to them. Plus, their ancestors had occupied and cultivated the land for generations; the land was scared to the Natives. Furthermore, I do not support the removal of Indians. President Jackson thought the removal of Indians would only benefit us. However, it does not. The removal of Indians forever changed the relations between whites and Native Americans. I know this because the whites invaded the Natives and took their belongings. Americans also forced Natives to leave their homelands and relocate to the Indian Territory. As you can see, the whites are no longer on good terms with the Natives.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cherokee Indian Removal

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The basic problem was how to get the Indian Territory. The Washington Administration viewed four possibilities for the Indians. First, extermination was often favored but impractical. Second, isolation was equally impossible. Third, citizenship many believed the Indians should become citizens, but the Indians refused this. Fourth, removal was at first rejected by the Indians but became the only alternative.# The Washington Administration first tried regulating the Indians under the Secretary of War, Henry Knox. The administration then began a policy of '"'Indian civilization.'"' It wanted to create a race of Indian people that relied less on hunting and more on agriculture. The Washington Administration continually entertained the notion that once the Indians were proficient in agrarian sciences, they would be able to cede their lands in the east and move westward. Certain Cherokee refused to assimilate into the '"'white'"' agrarian way of life and voluntarily immigrated to the western regions of the country. These Cherokee were a minority, for most Cherokee stayed in their homelands and worked toward a more '"'civilized'"' way of…

    • 4670 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays