Preview

Chicago Handgun Laws Pros And Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
664 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chicago Handgun Laws Pros And Cons
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its second major ruling on gun rights in three years, ensuring our federally protected right to keep and bear arms in all 50 states. The ruling states that the right to "keep and bear arms" is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. No longer will State or local governments be allowed to ban most Americans from owning most types of handguns. The ruling effectively strikes down Chicago's handgun ban, not unlike the Washington D.C. law that was already ruled to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court two years ago in D.C. v. Heller. Gun Rights Advocates hailed the decision across the Country as a major victory before the "conservative" majority …show more content…
v. Heller in 2008, Alan Gura, also represented Otis McDonald in this case, McDonald v. Chicago. He claimed that Chicago's handgun ban fails to allow him to adequately protect himself. Gura litigated that the Second Amendment, in addition to federal jurisdictions, should also be applied against state and local governments. He argued before the Court that, "In 1868, our Nation made a promise to the McDonald family that they and their descendants would henceforth be American citizens, and with American citizenship came the guarantee, enshrined in our Constitution, that no State could make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of American citizenship." James Feldman, lawyer for the City of Chicago, responded by saying, "States and local governments have been the primary focus of firearms regulation in this Country for the last 220 years. Firearms, unlike anything else that is the subject of provision in the Bill of Rights, are designed to injure and kill."

The ruling in McDonald v. Chicago had the same outcome as D.C. v. Heller, a 5-4 decision with all Justices voting the same way. Ironically, Chicago's Mayor, Richard Daley predicted mass chaos and death when the D.C. handgun ban was struck down in 2008. Obviously, his prediction never came to fruition as Washington's murder rate plummeted over 25% in 2009 alone. The drop compares with only a 7% drop nationally. Additionally, robberies involving guns fell over 14% and assaults with guns fell over 20% during that time same time

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The court that the case started in was the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The court system agreed with Heller and said DC was denying him the rights to own a handgun or any other type of firearm in the house for his personal protection for him and his family. The fact that the District of Columbia wanted the firearm to be non functional also…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2) Facts: Otis McDonald, a Chicago resident, tried to purchase a handgun for the purpose of protecting his home and body but was denied due to a Chicago city ordinance that banned the possession of personal handguns. McDonald filed suit against the city of Chicago under the claim that the 2nd amendment of the U.S Constitution gave individuals the right to own a handgun, and that the 14th amendment for due process made the 2nd binding to the states. The case of District of Columbia v. Heller was used for precedent in this case. The latter case found the banning of personal handguns for the use of protecting the home unconstitutional, however only in D.C. The case did not apply to every state.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    City of Chicago case as being judicial restraint, it can also be interpreted as judicial activism. The decision of McDonald v. the City of Chicago made Chicago change its law. In the City of Chicago, with a permit, the people of and around Illinois are allowed to carry handguns. Before the Heller v. City of Chicago case, the precedent on guns was set by United States v. Miller case of 1939. In United States v. Miller, Jack Miller gets in trouble for carrying a saw-off shotgun across state borders.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Library of Congress. (2011, April). United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court. Retrieved from…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the D.C. handgun ban was unlawful because it superfluously infringed on a individual right to bear arms. Heller lawyer in closing of his opening statement finished by stating “We start therefore with a strong presumption that the Second Amendment right is exercised individually and belongs to all Americans.” Heller lawyer went on to countered the D.C. militia interpretation, arguing that the Second Amendment did in fact grant citizens the individual right to own gun. Heller lawyer stated “[T]he most natural reading of "keep Arms’ in the Second Amendment is to "have weapons.'”…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article, "Supreme Court Declines to Hear Case on Concealed Gun Restrictions" is about a case that was declined by the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday. The case, Peruta v. California, argues the good cause requirement in order for residents to be able to applying for a license to carry a concealed weapon infringes on Second Amendment rights. This mean the U.S Supreme Court was presented with a case about the Second Amendment and dismissed the court without hearing it. I believe the U.S Supreme Court should’ve listen to the case and not just this case, but every case. If someone is filing a lawsuit it’s because they was concerned about a certain topic. Therefore, their problem should be solved.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Court orders reconsideration of Maryland gun law ruling” by Larry O’Dell February 2016, The Washington Post. Richmond, Va. Maryland’s assault weapons ban implicates it citizens Second Amendment rights and must be reviewed under a judicial standard. District Judge Catherine C. Blake gave gun-rights supporters a chance to argue to overturn and challenge the law. The Firearms Safety Act was passed after Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre. The Act was a pro because it was designed to reduce gun violence and make the public safer. Maryland’s law affects the constitutional right to possess firearms for self-defense and home protection for the law-abiding citizens. Because of Maryland’s ban on commonly owned firearms violates an individual right…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those against gun control believe in these private protections. The Framers weren't able to predict everything the future would hold including the rapid growth in crime and violence. James Madison, who wrote the Constitution believed in the freedom and liberty of the individual, he discusses the advantages the private individual in America contained at the time with the right to bear arms compared to the many individuals of the nations in Europe. With the increase in violence and crime within the United States today the beliefs of James Madison and the framers become even stronger. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the court recognizes that the government can regulate gun rights but that the Second Amendment does establish an individual right to bear arms. The Court said its decision should not be interpreted to question the right of government to: prohibit felons and the mentally ill from owning weapons, prohibit guns in schools or public buildings, ban certain categories of guns not commonly used for self-defense, and to establish certain other conditions on gun ownership. Thus, the Washington D.C. gun ban was overturned just as many other cities have done since then. If we eliminate this right to bear arms then we…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chicago Gun Policy

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Chicago people must carry a permit to have a concealed weapon and must have background checks before any purchase has been made. Unfortunately, it has the third highest murder rate within the US. Some argue that Chicago’s gun policy may be weak but it's actually quite the opposite. The main problem for the people in the Chicago is the gangs that plague the city with violence. In an article from the New York Times by Monica Davey, she referred to a raid that the Chicago Police department performed that was two days long and is currently the largest gang-related raid in the history of the city. Following the successful raid, the department made the claim that the city’s violence could be from the few but very hostile gang members. According to the police department of Chicago, the raid was efficient and effective, as raids could be more frequent in an attempt to reduce the murder rate in Chicago. Monica gives an account of the police report following the successful raid. ”Chicago officials say that a small number of people perhaps only 1,400 in a city of 2.7 million are driving the majority of the violence. The police said they seized 23 guns, more than $45,000 worth of drugs and hundreds of packs of illegal cigarettes. Charges included illegal possession of guns and selling drugs” (12). Following this raid, the police have gathered 23 guns and $45,000 worth of drugs. This is a possible reason why the homicide…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment reflects the right of all Americans to own weapons for a legal purpose, such as self-defense in the home. It also recognizes the need for weapons to ensure safety for the citizens and keep a well-regulated militia. The prefatory clause refers to the concept of the militia being allowed to bear arms for the safety of the state. The operative clause is very controversial, as it discussed the average citizens ability to own a weapon. The District of Columbia vs. Heller case was centered on a Washington D.C. law that was enacted in 2008, prohibiting citizens to bear arms within their homes. The court claimed this law to be clearly unconstitutional, as it violated the command of the Second Amendment. A restriction still remained on the mentally ill and felon ownership of handguns, but every qualified individual was again granted permission to own a handgun for lawful purposes.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Recently, Congress struck down federal regulations for gun background checks and the purchase of assault weapons, while New York City has pledged to have the toughest laws in the nation for illegal handguns. Evidence suggest that simply banning the possession and purchasing of illegal handguns, will have a minimal effect on gun crimes. As it becomes harder to purchase guns, in both the primary and secondary market, gun homicide rates will slow down as fewer guns are used on the streets. Since the repeal of the 2008 D.C. handgun ban, gun crimes in DC are at a record low. Even though there has been a long-term national decline in gun homicide trends, it suggest that something other than hand gun bans are responsible for the observed decline in gun homicides(Britt, Kleck, Bordua). Regulation is just one part of an approach to fighting crime and other factors such as the number of police on the street and how they police are more important factors.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Guns Should Be Illegal

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages

    tried to ban the possession of handguns we will see many arguments on why a person does not need to carry a handgun and why a person should be allowed to do so. If you were to ask a hundred people how they felt about gun control, you would probably get a hundred different answers. So I can see the arguments that were brought forward in this case. Let’s ask ourselves, will preventing someone from carrying a concealed handgun on them prevent crime or someone from being killed with a handgun? No not at all. Just because we take the rights away to carry a handgun will not prevent someone from being killed. Any person can get a handgun or assault rifle anytime they want, whether it is in a legal manner or in an illegal manner. I think this is why in the cases with Chicago and Washington D.C. the Supreme Court reversed the decision to ban possession of handguns in both the states. On June 28, 1010, the Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote decided to reverse the decision, stating that the Second Amendment was incorporated under the Fourteenth Amendment therefore protecting the rights to “keep and bear…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June, 28, 2010 The United States Supreme Court handed down a decision by a vote of 5 to 4 that affirmed gun ownership as a fundamental right of the American people. Prior to this decision the cities and states felt that it was their rights and responsibility to be able to control who or what kind of guns the people could own. As in many instances the states only read part of the Constitution, and that part was the part that would..…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays