Robin Cock speech very much about how the Britain´s not only comes from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
“Tonight I want to celebrate britishness”
That was the first thing Robin Cook said. He wanted to show how the Britain’s is not only comes from the British islands; they come also from Italy, Germany, Netherland and many more.
He thinks that is very important for a country to have good connections to other countries. That will strength the economy, the security of the nation and helps the people against crime.
Robin Cook resigned from his post as leader of the House of Commons because Britain did participate in the war against Iraq. He speech about how country have to cooperate together, that is the way to make the world safe.
The receiver of the speech is those people who as arrived and are new I Britain. He speech to them because they have to fell as a part of the British country. Britain should be a country where there is space for everyone, that the way it has been for hundreds of years. London was established by Romans from Italy, and there were people from Germany and Netherland that lived here. Just like USA and Canada who is also a mixed country.
“The British are not a race, but a gathering of countless different races and communities, the vast majority of which were not indigenous to these islands”
Britain was not open for foreigners at they should be according to Robin. There were three threats against. Foreigners that came and wouldn’t be a part of the British identity. Robin tried to be optimistic but it was hard. He describe it like the EU already is only country. He was afraid of being a part of the EU, because it will properly take the British identity away from the Britain’s.
“I Want to go further and argue that in each of the areas where the pessimists identity threat, we should instead see developments that will strengthen and renew British identity”
At last it was that Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland gets more and more power. That is seen like they are just few steps away from break up with the United Kingdom. That will also ruined the British identity. The other countries will there own identity, and that way be self-controlling.
“Britain was unusually open to external influence; first trough foreign invasion, then, after Britain achieved naval supremacy, through commerce and imperial expansion. It is not their purity that makes the British unique, but after the sheer pluralism of their ancestry”
Britain should not be afraid of losing their identity. The country was build on colonization. It’s a country where no one is real British. They have to be a part of the Vikings, the Germans, the Romans, the Indies and by the colonies they had in Africa. They have to adjust to fit into the British system. The British is a little part of every of those country who has been a part of building the country up from the start. They all suddenly doesn’t have same religion but, they can some things they can get and share together, like Cricket, that really comes from India.
“The modern notion of national identity cannot be based on race and ethnicity, but must be based on shared ideals and aspirations. Some of the most successful countries in the modern world, such as the United States and Canada, are immigrant societies”
Britain is a successful, that they can have more than 30 ethnic groups that speaks more than 300 languages, is successful. They have to find a thing that they can share. Not just one, but many different things. Sports or music, they should find every different culture could “speak” to each other. If that don’t happen they will properly just close themselves up in their own closed community. That will not be good and the will have a hard finding a national British Identity that all can share.
“Chicken Tikka Massala is now a true British national dish, not only because it is the most popular, but because it is a perfect illustrations of the way Britain absorbs and adapts external influences”
k
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
With Great Britain, there was a greater opportunity for trade. In the document, by James Chalmers, Plain Truth, in paragraph nine, it says “When independent, we can no longer trade with Europe.” Great Britain ruled an abundance of territories around the world, providing a great deal of trade opportunities. In the written communication, by Rev. Charles Inglis, The Deceiver Unmasked, in paragraph 63, it states “By a connection with Great Britain, our trade would still have the protection of the greatest naval power in the…
- 86 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The main claim of this passage is the unjust and tyrannical rule of the Great Britain over its colonies, in what is now, and referred to as the United States of America. As the author refuses to acknowledge British policies and legislature as a legitimate authority in his motherland and demands freedom, this is but a claim of policy. The author insists that every man is entitled by God to a just and free legislature, which safeguards one’s rights and honor. Therefore; supporting his claim and hence arguing that they have been given the divine right to denounce the Britain’s exercise of unjust power over their lands.…
- 317 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
- The author feels that the Americans should pay their respect in the form of taxes to Britain, as Britain has done all it has to protect it. Protection costs a lot,…
- 548 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Instead of having a drift between these two countries, Britain can benefit and gain revenue from America He also argued that the Britain government’s stands on America may be denied of its freedom because of conflicting with the English standards of freedom to which it is devoted to. He states that, given the intensity of American's commitment to their freedoms and devotion to it, that for Americans to come to an alternative reconciliation that it may not be too appealing and may result in violence. He states that people that are free are easier to control than those people who are persecuted by dictatorship. I do think that Burke was ahead of his time. I believe that due to the political revolutions in today’s date, it proves Burke’s mistrust of grandiose promises and rational faith. He left a legacy in his books that until this day, it’s still a full of rich source for academics and intense…
- 300 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Britain, which at the time was thriving with prosperity. Therefore, to come to a nation…
- 792 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Britain was a very attractive place people came to Britain this was because of the excellent health care, stable laws and the good schools and houses that were available...…
- 308 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“I think I should indicate why I am here in Birmingham, since you have been influenced by the view which argues against 'outsiders coming in.'” This ties directly to the thesis to set up why he's come to…
- 765 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Paragraph 4: “Every kind of person is here. You come from every corner of the Commonwealth.”…
- 478 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
They experience patronising attitudes from some Anglo-Saxon locals. Ethnicity is highlighted as a point of difference, not a multicultural melting pot where everyone belongs.…
- 1064 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The customs of the Britons differed from that of the Romans. Britain was the largest of the islands known to the Romans, who thought of Britons as barbarians. The physical characteristics of the Britons varied, suggesting that they mixed with the different peoples surrounding them, for example the Gauls. With whom they shared a common language and religious beliefs. Tacitus speaks of the Britons Military and fighting style. The Britons strength is in their infantry, and their weakness lies in their lack of cooperation. They fight as separate states instead of uniting as one against a common enemy, and therefore they are usually conquered.…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
People claimed that the only reason that colonies were connected were because of one common factor: Britain. He uses this idea in turn to shame Britain for her conduct, even to the point of comparing her to being worst then a brute. He continues on to say that the convoluted way Britain is treating America deserves no loyalty but instead the fleeing of America from its “parent country”. He refers back to the primary reason of leaving Britain, evaluating that the “same tyranny which drove the first emigrants from home, pursues their descendants still.”…
- 741 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Tory: "a thing whose head is in England, and its body in America, and its neck ought to be stretched."…
- 454 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The British people are referred to as “our British brethren.” The colonists and the British share a “common kindred”. Their unselfishness is seen through the word magnanimity. But they are like their king, “have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity.” The British people must be seen, as the rest of the world is seen, as “enemies in…
- 606 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the first encounters of race was when the “European explores reached the Western Hemisphere.” It was there that they first discovered “people who looked and acted differently. These ‘natives’ challenged their ‘discovers’…
- 1138 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The author’s view is that multiculturalism in Britain today causes less difficulties than in the past. He mentions that some people say that multiculturalism causes problems because of ‘racial and religious tensions’ (l.27-28) but he is convinced that this won’t be a new challenge if it exists. According to him, multiculturalism in the past was always combined with bad manners like ‘a sword in the belly’ (l.31) in the age of the Vikings or ‘bonfires, stakes and heretics’ (l.32) in the sixteenth century.…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays