1. Affirms Theism: The belief in a supernatural God
a. Christ-centered
b. Relies on two foundations:
b.i. Special Revelation: God’s more specific communication – through the Bible and Jesus Christ – about salvation and his nature
b.ii. General Revelation: God’s communication – through nature and conscience – regarding his existence
c. Position is established with the concurrent forces of many, starting from different and independent standpoints (James Orr)
c.i. Christians see evidences of God everywhere
SPECIAL REVELATION
1. Divine words and acts contained in the Bible about Christ Jesus
2. Destiny of humanity involves both salvation and judgment
3. Answers questions like…
a. From what must I be saved?
b. Why will judgment occur?
4. Key that opens the door to both heaven and earth ex) Bible/Scripture
5. Words of God; known to be God-breathed (2 Timothy 3:16-17)
6. Degree of moral truth supports its divine inspiration
7. Through, open-minded
8. Need to be studied and conform ourselves to its teachings and messages Ex2) Jesus Christ
9. Teachings, actions and resurrection provide the cornerstone for special revelation and solid foundation for Christian theism
DESIGN AND GENERAL REVELATION (Created Order)
1. Necessary yet insufficient knowledge about the Creator
2. Can recognize ultimate truths
3. In William Paley’s Book Natural Theology, he suggests that everything proves the existence of God and a grand Designer – Argument from design: Something exists=There is a designer
a. Ex) Scientific discoveries (Excessive DNA research)
b. Ex2) Human nature – realization that moral law exists
WHAT DOES REVELATION TELL US ABOUT GOD?
1. Relationships existing between God and us
2. Redemption
3. God’s divine personality:
a. self-awareness
b. emotions
c. self-determination
4. God’s Anthropomorphic Sensibilities: Sorrowful (Genesis 6:6), Angry (Deuteronomy 1:37), compassionate (Psalm 111:4), jealous (Exodus 20:5), satisfaction (Genesis 1:4)
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PERSONAL GOD
1. Sovereign in regard to his will
a. “He does according to his will in the host of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth” (Daniel 4:35)
b. He is omnipotent and exists everywhere
2. Moral
a. Distinguished between good and evil
3. Long-suffering Patience & Faithfulness
a. Ex) Willing to delay judgment for Israelites (Exodus 32)
b. Ex2) Faithful promise to save believers (John 10)
4. Triune: The belief in the one God who exists as three separate persons – Father, Son, and Spirit
5. Power
a. His Creation and Providence
b. Source of all things including the cosmos with his own mind and plan
c. He assigns destiny to every created thing
GOD AS…
1. Judge
a. Holiness is associated with judgment
b. Always fair, right, and perfect
c. God judges because all humans are sinners
c.i. Ex) Great flood (Genesis 6-7)
c.ii. Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19)
c.iii. Deaths of Nadab and Abihu (Leviticus 10)
c.iv. Fall of the Canaanites (Leviticus 18-20)
c.v. Fall of Israel & Judah (2 Kings 17, 2 Chronicles 36)
2. Redeemer
a. God’s mercy – provides an advocate for every individual and saves humanity from his wrath
b. Central theme: Love
b.i. “God so loved the world that he have his only begotten son, that whoever believes in his should not perish, but have eternal life” (John 3:16)
c. God’s Love is…
c.i. Universal
c.i.1. Loves every nation, tribe, race, class, and sex
c.ii. Gracious
c.ii.1. Love sinners who are undeserving and hating
c.ii.2. Covers our sin with grace
c.iii. Sacrificial
c.iii.1. Perfect and atoning sacrifice for humanity’s sin
c.iii.2. Similar to the concept of atonement in the Old Testament; different in that the second one is eternal while the first is temporary
c.iv. Beneficial
c.iv.1. All those who receive Christ will earn eternal benefits
c.iv.2. Followers will not be condemned or captive to sin
c.iv.3. Followers will be declared righteous, redeemed, forgiven, and gifted with new eternal life
Christianity Philosophy
Tommy Park Angie Lee Abby Wang
Introduction
1. Christianity doctrine = Requirement of faith
a. Naturalism and Marxism are firmly placed in science and enlightened human experience
b. Causes assumption: Christianity cannot have its own philosophy
c. No scientific methodology or ultimately logical and material explanation
d. Cannot prove the existence of God who is beyond material realm
2. Acquiescence of the assumption (by some Christians)
a. Evading the questions by claiming the subject is beyond logic
a.i. Common excuse of some Christians that lack reasoning for their belief
a.ii. This action piles onto the statement that Christians cannot have its own philosophy
b. Misinterpretation of Colossians 2:8
b.i. “See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy.”
b.ii. Misses “which depend on human tradition and the basic principles of life RATHER than on Christ.”
3. Bible’s command
a. Isaiah calls upon the adherents to actually reason together for the Lord
a.i. God wants His people to defend their faith
a.ii. Somehow implies that there is a logical method to reason God
b. Questions still remain whether or not Christianity can be defended philosophically or scientifically
4. Merits of Christianity
a. Comprehensive and complete answers to the ‘big’ questions
a.i. How did I get here?
a.ii. What do I live for?
b. Encourages and attracts people who sincerely seek truth
Faith and Epistemology
1. Epistemological problem in Christianity
a. Truth seems unable to be known without conflicting science
a.i. Christianity’s major dependence on revelation
a.ii. Miracles and supernatural events that none had experienced
b. All knowing requires faith = Scientists have faith in scientific methodology
c. All worldviews rely on their respective premises
c.i. Not scientifically valid
c.ii. Out of logic or lacking evidence
c.iii. Assumption (it is, just because.)
d. All knowledge ultimately comes down to some fundamental assumptions
e. Faith precedes reason
2. The actual crucial problem
a. “Some thinkers place their trust in a set of assumptions in their search of truth, while other thinkers place their trust in a quite different set of assumptions.” – Warren C. Young
b. Sources are not inclusive to be sources of ALL truth
b.i. Science
b.ii. Experience
b.iii. Emotion
c. Christians realize that all sources cannot be perfect
c.i. Science can be flawed and mistaken, thus imperfect
c.ii. History can be distorted, inaccurate, and unrealistic, thus imperfect
d. Biblical revelation is true because God is perfect
3. Christian Philosophy
a. Comprehends and utilizes historical evidences
b. Bases on special revelation that is perceivable
c. Abides the law of evidence
d. Has the most rational philosophy among all worldviews
e. Requires less faith, indeed, than others
Reconciling Science and Christian Philosophy
1. Dichotomy in Cosmology
a. Science – All the precise cosmological constants and measurements to sustain life on Earth were happy accidents
b. Christianity – In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth (Genesis 1:1)
c. Most people are inclined to believe the explanation that is most plausible (in this case the creation)
2. Ironic Ally
a. Scientific method is as limited as amiable to Christianity
b. Despite the common hostility from science to religion tenets presented, science mounts good reasons that support Christianity
3. Limitation of Science => Existence of God
a. Second Law of Thermodynamics
b. Impossibility of Spontaneous Generation of Life from Non-life
c. Genetic Information Theory
d. Anthropic Principle
The Origin of Science
1. Christianity, the Mother of Modern Science
a. Science does not threaten Christianity
b. The founders of modern science were Christians (creationists)
c. Belief in creation was the moment of truth for modern science
2. Orderly Universe
a. Should universe be chaotic and disordered, there would be no philosophical basis for science
b. Orderliness of Earth directs to the teleological argument
b.i. Law of Nature
b.ii. Law of Gravity
Metaphysics: Ontology/Cosmology
1. Metaphysics of Christianity
a. ‘Mere Christianity’
b. God is the source of all things as He is the ultimate reality, the Creator, and the Designer
2. No Logos, No Cosmos
a. 1 John 1:1-4 “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God…”
b. Parameters of Christian Philosophy sets in one flow
b.i. God before people
b.ii. Design before creation
b.iii. Logos before Cosmos
c. Every level of cosmos explains God’s logos
c.i. Atomic
c.ii. Organic
c.iii. Human
c.iv. Galaxy
3. Irrationality of Evolution
a. Evolution – all things are results of accidents
b. Equivalent to the claim that skyscrapers can be constructed without basis, plans, and builders
Mind/Body Problem and the Mental Proof
1. Mind as proof for God
a. Mind/Body Dualism
a.i. Brain – a matter that exists in us
a.ii. Mind – something more than a matter than exists within us
a.iii. The disparateness hints that there are material matters and matters beyond material (Higher Mind – God)
b. Mind/Body Monism
b.i. Body and mind are both material
b.ii. Implausibility to explain mind as a pure material substance leads to supernatural solution
2. Realism and Supernaturalism
a. Realism – Christian philosophy; what one encounters exists dependently upon God the Creator
b. Supernaturalism – Reality is more than nature; God intervenes in the nature
3. Materialist/Naturalist Dilemma
a. Naturalist thinking about nature does not attend to the fact that they are using their mind
a.i. Mind is not merely natural
a.ii. Their thinking itself directs to something other than nature
b. Supernatural is not distant from us, it is as close as breathing and daily activities
4. Inevitability of Supernaturalism
a. Mind is not accidental
b. The more we dig into science, the more we see mental experience as familiar phenomenon
c. As individual realizes and acknowledges the existence of mind distinguished from the material matter, belief in supernatural is unavoidable
Conclusion
1. Supernaturalism > Philosophy
a. Christianity, as supernaturalism, is more than philosophy, and is a holistic worldview
b. Christianity is consistent with the Bible
2. Inevitable Choice – Materialism or Supernaturalism
3. Christian Philosophy
a. It is coherent, rational, and truthful
b. Comprises purposeful life
c. Reflection of philosophy is life after all
d. Immutable, but the world is changeable
4. Christians must understand the other worldviews so that they can meet their challenge
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
record of God’s revelation of himself to humankind in Jesus Christ, and as great literature.…
- 1454 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Write 2-3 sentences explaining how the three passages immediately above might shape the Christian worldview:…
- 700 Words
- 2 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Examine the ways in which the design argument provides evidence for the existence of God…
- 984 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
At the outset of the nineteenth century in Britain, religious faith and the study of the sciences tended to exist in harmony with each other. The study of God’s Word, in the Bible, and His Works, in nature, were assumed to be two versions of the same ultimate truth.1 When William Paley published Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity in 1802, he reinforced the concept of a designing God after positing that natural objects show evidence of design, emphasizing nature as God’s creation.2…
- 1118 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Examine the key ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of God?…
- 1100 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The anthropic principle proposes that the reason and purpose for the universe is the support of human life: ‘As we look out into the Universe and identify the many accidents…the Universe must in some case have know we were coming’ (Freeman Dyson, The Anthropic Cosmological Principle). It also demonstrates that the design argument need not reject the principles of evolution in order to assume a designing God. However, theistic supporters of evolution argue that scientific principles alone are not enough to explain a perfectly balanced natural order that…
- 956 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Paley’s Natural Theology (1802) presents his argument that if a watch is found in a field, it would be intelligent to assume that someone made it, not that it was a natural occurrence (New World Encyclopedia, 2018). As such, he felt the appearance of design was powerful creation evidence. Using the analogy of a watch and the watchmaker, Paley proposed evidence that the universe includes order and design, and thus a Designer (Paley, 1802). Accordingly, he pursued an argument based on the idea that reason is enough to explain his beliefs, as well as many arguments of Christianity. In simple words, the “watchmaker analogy” refers to the idea that if a found watch proves the existence of a watchmaker, the universe should thus prove the existence of a higher being.…
- 1278 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Teleology is an argument of God’s existence following the evidence of order defined as the design of nature. Teleological arguments also known as arguments from design, explain the order in the universe to the existence of God. The universe is believed to be ordered towards some end or a certain purpose. It is more reasonable to suggest that the universe was created by an intelligent being to accomplish a purpose rather than it being there by chance (McGrath, 2010). The teleological argument has been used to show the existence of God with popular arguments including that of William Paley. Paley used a watch to relate to the order, complexity and purpose of the universe. A watch has a number of ordered parts that work in harmony for an end…
- 889 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The design argument explicates many fundamental ideas in order to achieve evidence for the existence of God; its ideas are concluded by scholars such as Aquinas (analogy of the archer), Paley (analogy of the watch) and Tennant (anthropic principle). They use analogies and principles to draw arguments to their conclusions to the existence of God. The argument is teleological; it aims to prove that everything that God has designed has an end and a purpose.…
- 1541 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The most common and influential argument’s for the existence of God are design arguments. In the last fifty years design arguments have received the most attention philosophically. Design arguments are both empirical and inductive arguments. Design arguments identify properties of objects in nature and argue that the only way that they could have occurred or the best explanation for them is that there is some intelligent/higher being that created or conceived the object. William Paley was a Christian apologist in the eighteenth century who was known for his popular version of the teleological argument (“watchmaker analogy”). Paley stressed the idea that the world’s complexity and design is not based off luck or chance, but rather designed by…
- 157 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Although he was not arguing for an Abrahamic God, future followers of the Abrahamic religions adopted his analogy and adapted it to suit their beliefs. One of these followers was William Paley. In The Evidence of Design, he compounded the thought of the Anaxagoras’ nous and Cicero’s analogy of a sundial to deliver an argument for an intelligent designer. He claims that if an individual was walking on a beach and encountered a rock, the person would think that the rock was natural and had laid there forever. In contrast, if one were to find a watch laying in the sand, they would not doubt that an intelligent designer created it. He claims that we can look at the universe just as we would view the watch, and comprehend that an intelligent designer drafted the universe. He asserts that this understanding would be self-evident and…
- 2343 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It states that a designer must exist because living creatures and the universe all exhibit design. A typical example of this is the “Watchmaker Argument” which was given by William Paley. The argument is basically if you found a watch in a beach, you would logically conclude that it has a maker and not the product of a random formation. This is why when we look at the universe and all living things it is easy to conclude there is a designer since we see how perfectly the universe and life forms operate. Things such as the eye or the heart are used to prove the existence of God through design. I like this argument because it makes a lot of sense and is pretty easy to prove. This is because you can look at something as complex as a eye or look at the universe and know that it all has a designer and that designer is God. It is very easy to give this argument and all things point back to a creator because we can see the design in…
- 588 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
6. In the New Testament, Christ’s proclamation of the reign of God calls us to _conversion__ in which love is shown to reject revenge and violence and embrace forgiveness.…
- 479 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
b. What is the Bible good for according to Barth? Do you agree? In his essay, “The Word of God and the Word of Man,” Karl Barth suggests that the Bible functions best not as a means to respond to human questioning, nor as a prescription for morality, but as a place in which God generously reveals something of Himself and His world. That said, Barth readily admits that scripture can easily act as a mirror which divulges the ideology, psychology, culture, and doctrinal peculiarities of the reader.…
- 673 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Apostles’ Creed is a compilation of belief statements that embodies a widely accepted and terse summary of the fundamentals of Christianity, and although the Apostles’ Creed does not have the same authority as Scripture, this paper will seek to prove that if upheld to the apostolic tradition, or its orthodoxy, the creed’s summation of Christian doctrine is one that all believers should grasp, support, and consider.…
- 1210 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays