To emphasize, when his father shouts at him for not listening, this can only be mean anger, and when there are tears he can only be mournful. In this situation, Christopher incorrectly assumes that the cause of his father's anguish ought to be the death of their neighbour's dog, Wellington. Though in reality, this anger and frustration reflects Christopher’s reckless abandonment of his own safety. As consequence of such misinterpretations; even though Christopher is honest in his account of events; he cannot comprehend or recognize nuances in the temperaments of other characters. Ergo the reader must make these connections on their own as the narrator fails to convey the aforementioned abstract concepts. In conclusion, Christopher, as a narrator afflicted with Asperger's Syndrome is incapable of describing the complete human experience. His first person narration is forced through a filter of subjective bias due to his ignorance of emotional interaction. Nonetheless, though he is talented in logic based fields, the narrator is unreliable because he is only capable of limited communication and conveying biased perspectives. How can we trust such a compromised
To emphasize, when his father shouts at him for not listening, this can only be mean anger, and when there are tears he can only be mournful. In this situation, Christopher incorrectly assumes that the cause of his father's anguish ought to be the death of their neighbour's dog, Wellington. Though in reality, this anger and frustration reflects Christopher’s reckless abandonment of his own safety. As consequence of such misinterpretations; even though Christopher is honest in his account of events; he cannot comprehend or recognize nuances in the temperaments of other characters. Ergo the reader must make these connections on their own as the narrator fails to convey the aforementioned abstract concepts. In conclusion, Christopher, as a narrator afflicted with Asperger's Syndrome is incapable of describing the complete human experience. His first person narration is forced through a filter of subjective bias due to his ignorance of emotional interaction. Nonetheless, though he is talented in logic based fields, the narrator is unreliable because he is only capable of limited communication and conveying biased perspectives. How can we trust such a compromised