After reading Howard Zinn’s viewpoint on Columbus, the Indians, and the human progress I can now confirm/characterize that Columbus is, as historical figure, not a hero, but somewhere in between being a hero and a villain (being more towards a villain). Throughout the whole reading the reader can notice how Colombus’ mistake of finding a new route to Asia and mistakenly discovering an unknown land to the Europeans caused great pain for the natives who were forced into labor/made into slaves to go find and bring Colombus gold, so he can give it to Spain for them to send more ships to Columbus to get more gold for the country’s wealth, and when they couldn’t find any they would be killed. Colombus’ discovery led to many deaths and the Europeans…
Columbus wrote that the natives were “most timid people” and that their Highnesses should “command to be shipped, as many slaves as they choose to send for”. He is blatantly stating that the Natives will be an easy people to conquer and to make into slaves. Columbus is presenting the queen with land, its many resources, and people who can build on it using free labor. He totally disregards the Natives way of life and that there is already an established group of people living off the land and using these…
Columbus was only doing what any other person under the ruling of a king and queen would have done back then, to serve and please them in any way possible. He wanted to show himself to his king in queen. Christopher of course is known for discovering America, but on the way there he did things that are frowned upon now. On his discovering he made the Natives into slaves, forced them to as he please or they would get punished. Columbus should not be bashed upon for his prejudices and brutality, back then it was all around the world and everybody was doing it, it wasn’t a wrong thing at this time.…
Christopher Columbus is a man who is known in society simultaneously as a hero and a villain of his time. What if the world had to pick only one, what would it be? Many new studies and scholars believe that Columbus was the villain of his story not a hero as past information would lead us to believe. Past documents were all written from Europe’s point of view, this lead to extremely biased documents because Europe was the side to profit unlike the Native Americans. Columbus was the antagonist of the new world due to how he forced the natives into slavery, he raped and robbed the natives he found, and how he slaughtered the natives if they could not collect enough gold.…
His men had rounded up many of the Indians to transport as slaves to Spain, since Columbus had to send something in replacement of all the nonexistent gold. He also traded with the Indians unfairly, making they trade lopsided and bad for the Arawaks. This unethical treatment began to worsen more and more as the Spaniards under his command were at the island longer. Calling Christopher Columbus a hero is like saying the sky is green. The Europeans had taken many Arawaks as slaves and made them work on plantations called encomiendas. They also used the Arawaks for free labor forcing them to work in mines and separating families. However, the most unethical treatment of the Arawaks came when the Europeans became very interested in gold. Each Arawak was responsible for collecting a certain amount of gold in a couple months time. When they collected the gold, they would receive a medal from the Spanish. If an Arawak did not collect enough gold, they would be killed. These killings led to more and more. Eventually, the Spanish would kill the Arawaks just for fun, or to try out weapons. This led to a rapid decrease in the Arawak population due to death, disease, and suicide. Eventually, there were no Arawak Indians left in the…
[online]. [Accessed 24th October 2014]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.glencoe.com/sec/socialstudies/btt/columbus/native_peoples.shtml> http://www.wlcsd.org/Loonlake.cfm?subpage=1432988 http://allaboutexplorers.com/explorers/pizarro/ Lawyer: As you can see Christopher Columbus has shown that the treatment towards the natives was normal since Cortes had done the same thing and that the fact it was for valuables like gold and wealth and power and to be respected by the people around him and that these actions towards the natives were also because it was normal just because they wanted the natives the respect their God so all this would be normal in that time of era.…
Columbus treated the Native Americans intolerably when he arrived to the New World. Upon arrival, his plan was for him and his crew to exasperate, ravage, kill, mangle, and destroy the Natives, as well as acquire gold from their king (Document 7). He and his crew committed harrowing crimes against the Indians that were irreversible and deadly. He forcefully made Natives strip mountains top to bottom, split rocks, move stones, and carry dirt to the rivers to be panned out for gold; this put great pain into the Natives lives. Also, Columbus ordered for the Natives to carry him and his…
Lester, touches upon the different portraits of the famous explorer across various time periods, their origins, and their impact on society. Right from when I started reading this piece, I still had the memory of the previous article fresh in my head. Christopher Columbus was the one who started all that tragedy, wasn’t he? If he had never discovered the Indians and their land, the natives could have lived peaceful lives on their own. That is not the way things went down though, and at the cost of the natives’ peace and even their lives, Columbus found a gold mine; which can be interpreted in two ways. One: He found a pretty primitive population who the Spanish could use as slaves; and two: he found a brand new land, filled with untapped minerals and resources. To be completely honest, the beginning of this reading which talked about celebrating Christopher Columbus and his deeds did not appeal to me much. I agreed more with the outraged American Indian groups who said he was a man who “makes Hitler look like a juvenile delinquent,” because it can indeed be argued that his deeds were worse. Moreover, as the reading continues, different portraits of Christopher Columbus, hailing from different artists and time periods, are examined. I think the fact that there were so many different and unique portraits of him shows us that no one really knew what Christopher Columbus looked…
Las Casas directly displays the evil wrongdoing and savagery of the Spaniards and Christopher Columbus when he displays the empirical data of the Island of Hispaniola. The island was once so densely populated, estimated to have roughly 3 million inhabitants, now a population of just two hundred people. (Casas) This contradicts the notion of Columbus as a hero because it depicts him as a rabid exterminator. A hero saves people and the manner in which Las Casas describes Columbus’s actions are anything but heroic. In Columbus’s own journal he describes the events that transpired on his voyage in a way that make him appear as if though he were not the hero many people gave him credit for. One specific example from Columbus’s Journal that display this lack of heroism is the following line, “I understand the natives but imperfectly, and perceive them to be so poor that a trifling quantity of gold appears to them a great amount.”. (Columbus) I believe this quote to portray Columbus in a way that almost certainty conveys greed and prejudice, because after he says this he begins to slaughter anyone that stands between him and this gold that is ever so valuable to these natives. Heroism is not stealing from the poor in order to gain for yourself, a hero displays qualities of charity and not thievery. Christopher Columbus has been celebrated throughout history as a hero, but in a growing popularity of opinion, he is beginning to be questioned. These questions deserve to be raised and examined, so that we can better understand our…
Christopher Columbus can in no way, shape, or form be considered a hero. A hero is someone who performs good deeds for the sake of others and not for their own benefit. Christopher Columbus did not do a single good deed in any of his four voyages in the late 1400 's. Christopher Columbus was not the founder of the Americas we live in today because he did not set a single foot on these grounds, even if he did there were already the natives who inhabited the land. When he first sited land it was further down south in the Caribbean Islands. Christopher Columbus can be considered the enforcer of slavery. Slavery was already going on when he left Spain. However, the natives could be used for trade with other goods, this was known as the slave trade. He and his crew basically enslaved a whole race of men, women, and children. When Christopher Columbus discovered what he thought to be the "New World", he had no idea that he would find a whole race of people. His intensions were to go out and find gold and spices to bring back to King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella in Spain.…
I then took a piece of rope and whipped her soundly, and she let forth such incredible screams that you would not have believed your ears.” (Michele de Cuneo) Michele de Cuneo was a crewmember of Columbus’ second expedition in 1493-1496. It is hard to go without noticing a pattern of Columbus looking the other way while horrible things happen to Indigenous people. One of Columbus’ supposed good deeds was actually influenced by greed for riches and fame.…
According to Eakin’s book, Columbus is a fanaticism who tries to find Asia in order to trade with people there for wealth. Columbus’s primary purpose is to find a place that is not Latin America. He only stumbles upon the Americas by accident. His motive is pure and benevolent. The urge to explore is human nature. Columbus is driven by this human nature for sailing out of Europe to Latin America in the spite of his miscalculation. He still thinks he arrived in the India before he dies. He calls the people on the American “Indian” which is used today when we refer to Native American people in America. All of his deeds are not intentionally harmful to Native American people at that time. He is somewhat…
As I research about the true story of Christopher Columbus, I discover that I have believed a horrendous lie my entire life that I truly would have preferred not to learn. Unfortunately, it is now too late and my life has been forever changed.…
Koning makes it a point in his book to show that Columbus was a very selfish man. He describes a scene from before his first voyage when Columbus left his son an orphan just so he could set out to sea. Throughout the book we can also see his selfishness get worse and worse as he becomes more and more infamous throughout Europe. Koning states, “Columbus assuredly was not a force for the good. If an entire race stood in his way, it had to go” (70). This only goes to show that Columbus only looked out for himself and really did not care about the well-being of others. Another part of the book that also demonstrates this idea is when Koning describes when Columbus and his men came across the “savages” on his second voyage. Koning describes how the savages were over powered and struggled to survive Columbus and his crew. The part that makes these killings so selfish on Columbus’ part is that he had no reason to kill these people, yet they still managed to massacre the helpless natives.…
From the moment Columbus was greeted by the natives, he immediately lost all respect towards them. Their nude bodies were defined as a lack of knowledge, skill, and religion (DeWitt). Columbus wanted to spread the word of Christianity among the Native Americans and at the same time he saw a source of easy profit by enslaving the Indians. Not once did it come to Columbus mind that these lands were not his to take but rather began to rename these islands when he sailed back home he had the entitlement of being “the founder”. During his first voyage, Columbus did not do anything incriminating against the Native Americans because he simply analyzed their culture. When he sailed back to Spain, he returned with many new items as well with kidnapped…