Preview

Christopher E. Anderson Case Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
980 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Christopher E. Anderson Case Summary
Background Introduction
This case is mainly talking about how Deloitte & Touche LLP allowed its former partner, Christopher E. Anderson continue to work at Deloitte under the period of suspension. Christopher E. Anderson is a certified public accountant who is licensed in Washington. He is a former partner and an agent of the Deloitte’s Chicago. Deloitte & Touche LLP is one of the largest four public accounting firms. It is organized as a limited liability partnership and its headquarters is located in New York.
On October 31, 2008, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) released the Anderson Order. The company was suspended for one year due to the violation of the PCAOB rule and auditing standard when he worked as the engagement partner for auditing the financial statement of Navistar Financial Corporation (NFC). Considering there was a $ 19.7 million in errors that caused overstates on the NFC’s assets and earnings, the auditor still issued a clean opinion on
…show more content…
However, Deloitte didn’t make any specific procedures and policies to make sure that he has not been to work as associated person during the suspension year. During that time Deloitte made a settlement with PCAOB, Anderson was transferred from Deloitte’s Chicago office to the Audit and Assurance Service (“A&AS”) Group within the firm’s Nation office in 2008. The key responsibilities of the A&AS Group provide consultation to all audit engagement teams and develop Deloitte’s audit policies and guidance. In spring 2008, Anderson was appointed as director in Nation office. This transference and nomination were approved by Deloitte’s Leadership Oversight Committee (“LOC”), even though LOC knew Anderson was subjected to a PCAOB-ordered

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It was seemingly a normal quiet night on the day of March 12th 2011, until Virginia Rasnick attempted to phone her husband several times with no response. Sidney Rasnick, while on a work assignment in Jesup Georgia, checked into a motel on March 6th 2011. The hotel was owned by Krishna Hospitality INC. Throughout the work trip for all 6 days he was staying there, her husband had a schedule of always making several calls a day to her, and always one at night before he went to bed. So when he didn’t answer the phone that night she knew something was wrong. Her husband Sidney Rasnik, had a history of heart problems and she was growing more and more worried after calling five more times with no response. Desperate she asked one of the hotel operators that answered the phone to check on her husband. She stated that she was “very worried about her husband” and that he had been on medication. The man on the phone told her that he knew who he was and that he was resting and she was disturbing him. She tried to argue this claim but he hung up. She ended up calling the hotel 8 more times, asking for…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 8 H&P Gerald Edwards

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a 53-year-old black individual a patient of Dr. Shelton, who has had diabetes for at least six months, but he thinks it has been longer than that. He says his last known blood sugar was in the 300’s. He presents in the ER today with a foot ulcer since January of this year. He stated that it started with blisters where he had soaked his feet too long in hot water. He has had no eye examination for two years. There has been no surveillance of chronic complications of diabetes.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Data Trappers Inc.

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Using these guidelines to evaluate whether or not B&T should be permitted to serve as the independent auditor of DTI it is somewhat apparent that B&T would not make a good independent auditor. B&T worked for Data Chips, a wholly owned subsidiary of DTI, in July and August of 20X8 providing bookkeeping services. In August of 20X9 DTI filed an 8-K with the SEC naming B&T as the successor auditor to Wilkers--this happened without the completion of new client acceptance procedures, signing of an engagement letter, or B&T actually beginning any actual audit procedures. Not only does this appear to be unprincipled, but it was done merely a year after B&T had been working for DTI.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    History: Steiney Richards was tried and convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Richards appealed the trial court’s decision, the Court of Appeals affirmed. Richards then appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and that court affirmed the appellate court’s ruling. (201 Wis. 2d 845, 549 N.W.2d 218 (1996)). Richards appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, certiorari was granted.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Craig Anderson was an African American male, in his late forties, who was murdered in what was classified as a hate crime. In Jackson, Mississippi on a Sunday morning, June 26, 2011, a group of white teenagers had been drinking all night and were on a mission, specifically seeking out a black person to cause harm to. James Anderson happened to be in a parking lot, near his car, when the group of teenagers pulled up and started to beat him while yelling racial slurs at him as well as yelling, “White power”. The teens then proceeded to hop in their truck and encouraged the driver to run over the victim, James Anderson, causing his immediate death. James Anderson was a well loved and respected member of his community, who attended church…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Charles Smith a once highly respected forensic pathologist who was praised for his work, now his reputation has been tarnished and his work has been proven to be a sham. He started his work in 1978 at the Toronto Hospital for Sick Children and was considered to be the leading expert in his field. Dr. Smith’s expert testimony on the cause of death in children lead to numerous criminal convictions. However during a review of 45 autopsies that Dr. Smith performed on children there had been some serious errors found made by the doctor in 20 of those cases. The findings of errors lead to the cases to be reopened which resulted in many overturns of convictions and has led to further inquiries into more cases where Dr. Smith gave expert testimony…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Auditing 530

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Corliss assembles his team which includes Lanny Beaudean who worked for the IRS for two years before joining the firm. Beaudean hopes to gain international experience with the firm so as to further his dream of becoming a CEO. The other two members of the team are Vinnie Gabelli and Jacki Oloff both of whom are not Arizona natives. After discussing their respective duties the team met at the end of the day to discuss their findings. After following a checklist of risk assessment they followed all except for the Verify the circumstances of any prior auditor’s dismissal1. The team felt that Yancy Corliss would be better suited to obtain this information. After non response from the firm’s…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evan M. Ostfeld Case

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page

    Evan M. Ostfeld, P.A. is a law firm that is located in Coral Springs, Florida. Their other law offices are located in Boca Raton, FL, Hollywood, FL, Tamarac, FL, Fort Pierce, FL, West Palm Beach, FL, Plantation, FL, Coral Springs, FL, Naples, FL, Fort Myers, FL, Jupiter, FL, Boynton Beach, FL, and North Miami, FL. Evan M. Ostfeld, P.A. specializes in workers compensation, personal injury / wrongful death, motor vehicle accidents, social security disability law, employment discrimination / labor law, as well as credit restoration and fighting unfair collection agency practices. Evan M. Ostfeld, P.A. has been the recipient of the Avvo Clients’ Choice Award in 2016 and Avvo Clients’ Choice Award for Workers Compensation. Evan M. Ostfeld, P.A.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 5.1

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Description: Smith is the Chairman of Cardillo Travel Agency, he just involved into a case that whether to sign the affidavit with United Airlines. Because he inspected that there is something wrong with the affidavit concerning Cardillo’s stockholders’ equity, so that he refused to sign affidavit. Just for this reason, he was kicked out from his position. Moreover, the other two of his executives Rognlien and Lawrence, just approved the $203,000 adjusting entry recorded link to Airlines-Cardillo transaction. Afterward, Helen Shepherd, an auditor of Touch Ross, found the mistake that the money cannot be recorded for the payment to Cardillo was refundable under certain conditions and thus not immediately as revenue, so she questioned Rognlien and Lawrence, but they still insisted the entry of the money has been properly recorded. And one year later, R and L just dismissed the Touch Ross accounting firm and hire KMG as their public accounting firm. After the turnover of KMG, they just founded this matter too, and resigned as the independent audit firm.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For one to be successful in understanding the legal concepts and the controversial challenges the judicial system encountered during this case one must have knowledge of the baseline undisputed facts involved in the profile of the case. This case involved the plaintive Peyton Simpson, born September 27th 1943, a managing partner at the Arthur Young accounting Firm in Cincinnati. In 1989 the Arthur Young accounting firm ad the Ernst & Whinney accounting firm decided to merge. Both firms held the public image of caring for their employees and primarily allowing their employees to easily climb the corporate latter of the company. The two firms guaranteed that partners of Arthur Young would receive equal if not better rights after the merger. They also emphasized the merger would not result in the discharge of partners.…

    • 3036 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Audit Report Apollo Shoes

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The firm of Anderson, Olds, and Watershed is pleased to receive your notification to proceed with the audit and look forward to working with you. From the Audit Committee meeting minutes, we understand that Apollo Shoes requires help with the yearly audit because the former CPA firm withdrew unexpectedly (University of Phoenix, n.d.). Anderson, Olds, and Watershed will conduct the audit and “prepare the state franchise tax returns as well as the federal tax returns” (University of Phoenix, n.d., p. 9). Because of Apollo’s previous work with Smith and Smith, Anderson, Olds, and Watershed is “required by auditing standards to communicate with” Smith and Smith (Arens, Elder, & Beasley, 2012, p. 212).…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine a writer who never shares his writing and who represents fiction as non-fiction. Imagine a young man who wants to be a writer so much that he believes his own "lies." In Tobias Wolff's novel _Old School_, the author poses an ethical dilemma to the reader concerning issues of personal identity and honor. Taking place at a preparatory school in the 1960s, the unnamed narrator struggles with moral issues that surround the development of his authentic self. His desperate desire to win the school's literary contest to meet the famous author Ernest Hemingway results in the narrator's singular experience of plagiarizing another writer's short story. Throughout the novel, Wolff demonstrates that…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hazelwood Case Summary

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In St. Louis, Missouri in the spring of 1983, the journalism students of Hazelwood East High School completed their final edition for the school year and allowed their school principal to review it before sending it to be printed. The principal, Robert Reynolds, decided an article concerning divorce was unfair and personal as well as an article about teen pregnancy was inappropriate. Reynolds was afraid the students would miss their deadline if they tried to change the stories and felt the best option would be to delete the two pages with the troubling articles and have the rest of the newspaper published.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board) has penalized Ernst & Young $2 million for violating audit firm PCAOB’s rules. Ernst & Young (audit firm) failed to properly evaluate how Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. (company) was calculating its reserve for sales returns.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The firm of Arthur Andersen LLP was founded in 1913 by Arthur Andersen and Clarence DeLany and named Andersen, DeLany & Co. The firm later changed its name to Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1918. Arthur Andersen LLP, based in Chicago, Illinois, was one of the “Big Five” accounting firms who perform auditing, tax, and consulting services for large corporations, such as Enron. In 2002, pending the outcome of the Department of Justice prosecution for obstruction of justice, the firm agreed and voluntarily surrendered its licenses and rights to practice auditing and other financial services in the United States. These charges stemmed from the firms handling of the auditing of Enron, an energy corporation, which resulted in the loss of over 85,000 jobs, devaluation of Enron’s stock from over $90 per share to pennies, and the bankruptcy of Enron. When Arthur Andersen was indicted, the firm lost almost all of its clients and faced over 100 civil suits related to its audits of Enron and other companies, such as Sunbeam and WorldCom. Additionally, Arthur Andersen’s reputation was so badly tarnished that no company wanted its name on their audit. In a 2005 Supreme Court ruling, the conviction against Arthur Andersen was unanimously reversed for serious flaws in the jury instructions. Specifically, “in the court's view, the instructions were far too vague to allow a jury to find obstruction of justice had really occurred. The court found that the instructions were worded in such a way…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays