Preview

Cicero Good Life

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1217 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cicero Good Life
Living a happy life is one of the ultimate goals of human existence. Everything an individual does is in some way related to their struggle to live a life they consider to be good, and while all attempt to live a good and happy life, there is no general consensus as to how that life is to be lived. Arguments pertaining to the good life abounded in Ancient Greece and Rome and have persisted to the present. Roman orator, philosopher, and politician Cicero argued that moral goodness was the only thing necessary for one to live a good life. The good life Cicero presented had little to do with worldly pleasures, in fact, he criticized those who believed that a happy life is a life consisting of pleasure, like the philosopher Epicurus whom he …show more content…
Cicero’s beliefs directly opposed those of Epicurus meaning that Cicero believed the good life could be lived with minimal pleasures. This belief caused his interlocutor in Discussions at Tusculum to question how that could be. Cicero’s responses to these questions provide important insight to his philosophy regarding the good life.
Cicero believed that moral goodness “is the best thing that there is-that it ranks above everything else” (79). If moral goodness is the best thing that there is, it must lead to the happy life, which is also the morally best thing there is. Cicero’s ideas of moral goodness and the happy life are very interconnected to the point where one cannot exist without the other. One who is morally good can live a happy life even through traditionally unhappy circumstances like poverty and torture because the morally good man is a wise man and a wise man is free from the weights of passions and is entirely “self-controlled, unwavering, fearless, undistressed” (78). A man who possess these traits must be happy simply because there is no reason for him to be unhappy, under any circumstances. It is as if
…show more content…
The meaning of the term “moral goodness” that Cicero used so often when discussing the good life undoubtedly has a different meaning to contemporary readers than it did to those in the time of Cicero. Regardless of the meaning, how one reaches the “good life” Cicero described is not important. Every individual is unique and different and because of that, the good life must vary from person to person. Cicero presents a base for what I believe the good life to be, but that based can be built upon and altered to create a better structure. Not all people will live this good life. Most will not because they will attempt to seek out only pleasure in life and not attempt to move beyond that basic instinct. Most people I have encountered strive only for pleasure and material goods. They believe that pleasure is the ultimate good. Society is partially to blame for this because it has led us to believe that material goods will lead to a happy and fulfilling life. Only a few who completely embrace living a life that is fully appreciated will be able to live the good life. Although living the good life will not make torture any less painful, it will allow for a life that is fulfilling and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Because people only live once, they desire a happy and successful life, in other words, a “good life.” To complete this goal of a good life, a majority of society will do nearly everything possible to be comfortable and be happy. The extremes, which people go to in order to achieve what they think is necessary, are merely shadows, or illusions of reality that are believed to lead people to a good life. However, according to the prominent Greek philosopher, Plato, the good life is one in which individuals are not entirely comfortable and happy. The good life is one in which they are finding the ultimate truth and becoming open-minded, sometimes forcing them to oppose the norms of society, and escape the shadows. Though it is hard to do, people who abandon the “cave” of false reality and misinterpretation will live a true good life. The people who have escaped the cave have enlightened themselves by thinking…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Aristotelianism is defined as happiness as the quality of a whole life time.’ “Happiness is the purpose for which we live. Aristotle concluded that happiness is not a moment to moment experience of pleasurable things but rather a way of characterizing how one’s life is being conducted. Happiness is living and having lived a good life”. (Janaro & Altshuler, 2009)…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the quest to find out what is the ultimate human good, Aristotle dedicated Book 1 of the Nicomachean Ethics to provide an account of what is the ultimate human good, and what it consists of. This essay will examine why Aristotle thinks that eudaimonia (happiness), is the ultimate human good. Through this discussion, we will see Aristotle suggest four central views which are critical to eudaimonia being the ultimate human good. Firstly, one has to live a life according to one’s function. Secondly, natural, virtuous activity is required in order to live a life of happiness. Thirdly, one requires possessing external goods such as wealth, power and friends in order to be happy. Last but not least, in order to live a life of happiness, one has to live a whole life in accordance to virtue in order to determine if the person lived a happy life.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus vs Epictetus

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To begin we must understand that there are many types of happiness. Happiness that come from pleasures such as eating tasty food or taking warms baths. Happiness that comes from engagement, for example trying something challenging and succeeding in doing so. Happiness that comes from meaning, in other words being religious and belonging to a higher being. Last but not least happiness that comes from accomplishments, achieving a lifelong goal or dream. As you can see there are many different ways to be happy and if you are living happy then you are living a good life.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle uses politics and ethics together to explain the good life. People generally disagree as to the nature and conditions of happiness. Some people believe that happiness is wealth, honor, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle thinks that wealth is not happiness because wealth is just a monetary value, but can still be used to gain some happiness. Not directly of course, money can only buy a person objects that can bring them happiness for a short period of time. Just like wealth, honor is not happiness, because honor focuses more on the people, rather then the honoree. Pleasure is not happiness, because "the life of gratification" is "completely slavish", since most of the people in the polis decided to live their life based on the way animals live. The people are punished for things not accepted and reward for actions excepted. The last is virtue, and virtue is not happiness either, since one could be virtuous and not use it. Instead, Aristotle says that happiness is a combination of the four. Thus, Aristotle describes the good life by saying that, "the…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people try to define and consider different definitions of what happiness is, and I think that Plato and Aristotle offer interesting views of happiness and what it means for one to live a good life. Both philosophers agree that happiness is an important factor in one’s life and essentially the essence of how to live a good life. Plato offers many theories and definitions of justice leading to happiness, while Aristotle argues that happiness is the main goal that all humans aim for in their entire life. Plato offers a philosophical view of a happy life for an individual by explaining a just state and what it would entail and also the theory of the forms that one must understand to achieve happiness. After learning about both philosophers, I have come to the conclusion that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness more because he gives us a broad outline of what a good life is. Although Plato was Aristotle’s mentor, Aristotle offers a view of happiness that is more plausible and relevant than Plato’s because it places a large emphasis on the idea of the function of a human being. Therefore, in this paper, I will argue that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness over Plato’s because of the way Aristotle describes how humans can achieve the greatest good in life: happiness.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant and Aristotle agree that all rational beings desire happiness and that all rational beings at least should desire moral righteousness. However, their treatments of the relationship between the two are starkly opposed. While Aristotle argues that happiness and morality are nearly synonymous (in the respect that virtue necessarily leads to happiness), Kant claims that not only does happiness have no place in the realm of morality, but that a moral action usually must contradict the actor’s own inclination toward happiness. Because Kant and Aristotle hold practically equal definitions of happiness, the difference must arise from the respective relationships between happiness and each author’s framework of morality. Because Kant offers a more universally accessible route to morality, whose end is the happiness of others, the world as a whole would be both happier and more virtuous if it operated under his philosophy.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Money, clothes, cars, houses, and even marriage – these are all things that some may consider to determine whether or not they are living the “good life.” Others may view the good life as being able to enjoy nature every day, being able to run and jump, or even being able to read as many books as they please. Whatever one’s view of having or living the good life may be, there are certain assets or factors in their lives that makes them believe that their lives are good. There are also certain things they did, qualities they possess or steps they took to get to their good-life status. Different people world-wide have different cultures and beliefs, and this leads them to have different perspectives on what the good life exactly is and how one goes about obtaining it.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although virtues are necessary to attain pleasure, it is not sufficient for happiness. These virtues are simply instrumental goods to help in calculating the best means for oneself. Epicurus would argue that being concerned with one’s interest should not have a bad connotation. There may be implications that each of us have no obligations to do anything other than what is in our best interests and we should pursue our interest in a rational way. It is true that his philosophy does not link ethics and happiness, but the idea of morality can still be considered in our own interest.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the end of the Second World War to the end of the Cold War in the early 1990’s, there existed an iron curtain, which divided central, and Eastern Europe from Western Europe. This iron curtain arose from the Soviet Union blocking its satellite states and itself from the non-communist nations of Western Europe. This resulted in the Soviet-influenced states of central and Eastern Europe being socially, economically, and politically different from the west. Following the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the Soviet Union started to lose its communist influence, thus diminishing the iron curtain that existed among Eastern European nations.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the biggest points of dispute in the Ancient-Modern debate concerns happiness and how one might define and eventually become happy. To properly understand the Ancient-Modern debate, it is necessary that one understand the principles that support this debate: in particular, that there is a relationship that exists between morality and politics, that politics is not the end in itself, and that human nature is complex, often contradictory, but graspable if sufficiently analyzed. When speaking of these principles, the Ancients argued that morality and virtue play an influential role in both the private and public life and that a good and honest ruler must possess each. Socrates, the great Greek philosopher, claimed that as did Boethius who…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is the good life? The Epicureans and the Stoics had rather differing philosophies on what the good life actually entailed. Epicurious, a Hedonist believe that pleasure was the ultimate good. That the elimination of pain was essential to pleasure and thus a good life. Epicurus, believed that the best way to achieve happiness is to reduce one’s consumption of materialistic things to only the necessities.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle And Pieper

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Being virtuous takes time and does not give immediate results, but it is worth the journey. Aristotle says, “He is happy who lives in accordance with complete virtue and is sufficiently equipped with external goods, not for some chance period but throughout a complete life.” 1101a10) . It takes great virtue to live a happy life. Now Living a virtuous life is said to be the way to the best way of life, so why do many many unvirtuous people say that they are living the best and happiest life?…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Virtue

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The end of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Book I introduces the idea that since happiness is “a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with complete virtue, we must examine virtue,” because doing so will allow us to closer analyze and understand how to study happiness. He goes on to identify two areas: virtues of thought and virtues of character. I believe the philosopher is right when he thinks that a good life requires harnessing both kinds of virtues.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays