Preview

Cicero On Just War Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cicero On Just War Summary
Cicero

HSM 311 Ethics & Homeland Security Instructor: 6/19/11

Cicero wrote a great extent on his concept of a Just War, yet his theory can be summarized into three simple rules. The first condition for a just war as proposed by Cicero is that there must be a valid or just cause. Cicero believed that a just cause includes the defense of honor as well as the restoration or upholding of peace. In other words, if ones honor is at stake or being attacked, Cicero would deem it just for war to be waged. St Augustine Christians should be pacifists in their personal lives. But he routinely argued that this did not apply to the defense of innocents. In essence, the pursuit
…show more content…

Yet Cicero places conditions even in the states authority to declare war saying that war can only be declared, “after an official demand for satisfaction has been submitted or warning has been given and a formal declaration made,” Therefore in Cicero’s perception, if war is declared the opposing side must be well aware and informed. This condition rules out wars that are declared in secrecy or wars, which are fought in which the aim is to catch the enemy off guard. St Augustine concurred with Cicero in that war should not be preemptive, but defensive, to restore peace.

Cicero’s final condition for a just war is that the war itself should be waged justly. Cicero believed that there must be humane treatment of all combatants no matter which side they are on. Cicero, who had a feeling of hatred toward war realized that the concept of warfare will continue to exist amongst human beings. Therefore he set out to create the criterion, which is known today as the Just War theory. Cicero’s aim was not to justify warfare but his intention was to bring warfare under the control of


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    under the power the power and dominion of the Roman people? Their houses, even though…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Michael Howard describes what liberal thinkers have expressed about the entity of war in different periods in history. Chronologically, he has tried to persuade us with the teachings of Erasmus and Thomas Paine to Mazzini’s idea of nationalism and its effect on war, to Jeremy Bentham’s arguments all the way up to the twentieth century capturing the liberal thinker’s philosophy of Fascism and Communism.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    While many scholars attempted to theorize war in human history, only few were credited for constructing consistent theories on which people could base and further their understanding of war and warfare. Those include Greek Thucydides, Chinese Sun Tzu, and Indian Kautilya all three from 3-4th century BC; Prussian Carl von Clausewitz and Swiss Antoine-Henry Jomini both from 19th century. All of those prominent theorist had a lot to offer and therefore had great influence on our thinking in war, warfare, and strategy. However, Clausewitz’s theory offers more insight if one carefully and purposely studied the “paradoxical trinity” identified in his…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cicero’s De Officiis, one should embrace his gifts from nature rather than envy other for theirs, i.e. an artist is better off perfecting his artistic talent than studying law. He also argues that fraud is the worst form of injustice, that is, the one who “practice[s] fraud to the utmost ability [to] do it in such a way that [he] appear[s] to be [a] good m[a]n (I.13). Although Cicero condemns fraud for obvious reasons, such as, corruption, is one unjust for using this gift against the enemy?—more so, what if one uses the gift of fraudulency, ((that is to say, a trained spy)) to do good for the community? The answer to those questions is no because Cicero’s argument on fraud and justice overlap in that scenario. For example, one…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Using this framework, war can only be waged by a sovereign political actor, which the U.S. fulfills due to its position as a nation. The U.S. also fulfills the Right Intention tenet of Jus Ad Bellum since it is fighting a war to restore the peace due to the unpredictable nature of ISIS. Similarly, the fulfills the Just Cause tenet of Jus Ad Bellum since the war would be fought in self-defense and against a known threat to the international system (ISIS). Moreover, the US has tried to avoid direct war with ISIS, but this attack warrants retaliation, thus fulfilling the last resort tenet of Jus Ad Bellum, since war was a last resort. Since the United States can circumscribe the war to specific regions, the damages caused by the war will not outweigh the benefits brought by victory, fulfilling the proportionality tenet of Jus Ad Bellum. Similarly, since the U.S. knows it can defeat ISIS and suppress Assad and thus establish a lasting peace in Syria it fulfills the tenet of creating a lasting peace through the…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare the poets attitude to war in ‘Dulce et Decorum est’ by Wilfred Owen and ‘Who’s for the game?’ by Jesse Pope…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    wears their face and their arguments.” This depicts how a traitor, when within a group, acts and pretends to be the same as everyone else and on their side. Meanwhile, they are really just…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compared to the early 20th century, the wars of today are vastly different. The reasons for fighting, the styles of fighting, and who is fighting are all very different. However, in an age that is far removed from the past, a few things regarding war have remained the unchanged. One of the ideas that has remained unchanged in a time that is every changing, are the rules of war, as described by Michael Walzer in his book, Just and Unjust Wars. Naturally, in a time where so much has changed, there are starting to be a few objections to Walzer’s claims on the rules of war. Even though the wars of today are far different from those of the past, the moral equality of soldiers remains the same regardless if they are associated with being on an unjust…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    He begins by making the senators think that there is an enemy right on their doorstep by saying that they are at the, "entrance of Eturia." The senators in this case believe that Cicero is referring to the entrance right outside of Rome, but in fact, Cicero is referring to the entrance on the other side of Eturia (quite a distance from Rome). If having a huge army outside their gate isn't enough for the senators, Cicero tells them that their number increases each day. This warning has to make the senators more fearful and anxious to get rid of Catiline, for the longer they wait, the greater the enemy becomes. Then Cicero, almost not needing to place more fear in the senators, makes them fear even more. He tells the senators that it is bad enough that there is an army right "outside" the gates, but when their leader is in the interior, gathering inside information, something must be done. The senators begin to ask themselves, "What if he has our war plans? What is he knows our…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War Just or Unjust

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some ask the question, was the Vietnam War just? Some may say yes it was just,and others say that it is unjust. However,Certain people view justice as slippery concept. There are always ways to get aroud justice, and that is why people believe that justice is a slippety concept. Even Plato one of the brightest of his time could not figure out whether war was just or unjust. A Certain individual, by the name of Aquinas, also attempted to elaborate his view on the war through the document Summa Theologica. His reasons consisted of, First, the authority of the sovereign by whose command the war is to be waged(Article 1). The second reason being, a just cause is required, namely that those who are attacked, should be attacked because they deserve it on account of some fault(Article 1). Thirdly, it is necessary that the belligerents should have a rightful intention, so that they intend the advancement of good, or the avoidance of evil(Article 1). In the article of Summa Theologica, he alos talks about whether it is just to ambush in war. On the other hand , the novel written by Jonathan Shay, Achilles in Vietnam, he agrues that the war was unjust. He gives examples using the stories the returning soldiers from the war told him. With these stories and sotires from the Illiad, he attemtps to explain to the reader that the war was unjust , and that it corrupted the innocent people sent to the battle zone.War is not just something that just happens, rather, it is something that has been festering for a while, and once it reaches the surface it explodes like a volcano. This war began as a peacful assist to the Southern Vietnamese, then once JFK was assasinated the U.S. began to take over all aspects of the war. Is the war just or unjust, maybe both, but with careful analysis of the war, one will get an uprfront and personal view of whether it was just or not.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thucydides makes a reference to Lacedaemonians who were of the notion of going to war only under dire need, reaching an understanding in which, they can give peace in place of war (Thucydides 1954, 67-68). He gives an example where if a courageous man experiences harm, he has every right to choose war over tranquility (Thucydides 1954, 68).…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many extreme pacifists reject the concept of just war and all justifications for violence. I actually disagree with the extreme pacifist that rejects the concept of just war and all justifications for violence. I feel that sometime war is something that just has to be done in order for people to solve curtain conflicts. St. Augustine is the known as the first one actually noted to be the founder of the theory of just war. A Just war is a theory that deals with the reason on why and how curtain wars are fought. The concept on a just war can be justified by concept of just war or the historical origin of just war reasoning. The just war aspect is about the ethical reasons on why they war is justified, and if that was last step that could have been…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays