Preview

Cicero's Five Canon Of Rhetoric

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1333 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cicero's Five Canon Of Rhetoric
BA in English and Communications
Freshman English 2
Term Paper
Final for grading The importance of the art of rhetoric

The art of rhetoric was very important starting from times of a great orator Cicero and as the history is filled with good or bad orators even today, we can assume that it continues to be one of the trickiest things to the present day that needs attention and hard work in order to succeed as a speaker or leader. The ability to perform as a good orator or a leader that will have constant followers requires knowing and using the five canons of Cicero that I am going to present in this paper by comparing different successful or bad speakers of our history using the
…show more content…
The first canon is called inventio, which means invention, and it claims that the speaker should make an argument and only then start developing it and supporting with valid evidence in order to concern the audience. Secondly, there comes the canon of dispositio, which means arrangement that represents the process of structuring the whole speech in right order so the audience will get the idea of argument correctly. After that goes the third canon, which in fact differs from others and depends on the speaker, but it is the one that defines that person as a leader who has its own style. As you have assumed it is about style and it is called elocution, which correspond to the idea of choosing a proper way of representing things …show more content…
History tells that Luther King succeeded because of his speech. When we analyze the text, we can see that he clearly stated his argument and constructed his address in a way that the message was delivered right, because he repeated the line “I Have a Dream” many times by pointing out his wish that should become true. Thus, we can see that Luther king follows Cicero’s first two rules of the processes of making an argument and arranging it in the text in a right way. Then, if we watch the videos of his speech, we will notice how perfectly he uses the rest of Cicero’s rules. Mr. King had a nice style of presenting his ideas, making his “I” to “We” by that showing that he is the ordinary one from the crowd. He addresses with confidence, with loud but still calm voice by using only the notes and mainly looking to eyes of crowd, by showing gestures that seems so familiar to people. It is very important to watch the video and focus on that details that indeed were the ones described in Cicero’s influential work. That is why Luther King is considered to be not only a good leader, but also a perfect orator. Moreover, he was not an exception because now it is time to present how an Afro-American woman used Cicero’s memoria and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff’s. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff evaluate the Neo-Aristotelian style by stating, “The importance of this principle can scarcely be exaggerated; without it, modern speech criticism would not have been possible.”(464) They go on to explain that without this style speechmaking wouldn’t be as exceptional today and would be much like ancient rhetoric. They say, “The problem in the traditional system appears to be an omission rather than an inherent defect the genre and remain consistent with Aristotelian principles. Finding Rosenthal’s analysis of ethos suggestive, we approached the campaign oration as an instance of “personal persuasion.”(464) Where the crowd and audience act more or less like a judge of future events similar to that of an election. The speaker must be prepared to embrace the crowd while giving their speech. G.P. Mohrmann and Michael C. Leff compare a variety of speech analyzation styles throughout their article however coming to an ultimate conclusion of the ability to critique comes strictly from the critic…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    anyone to find justification in the assassination of their emperor. Now, in Antony’s speech he…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heinrichs presents the reader with Cicero’s five canons of persuasion which are invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery. Out of these five I believe you most importantly need to use arrangement and delivery. “Start by winning over the audience. Get them to like you through your shared values, your good sense, and your concern for their interest. Make them identify with you. All the tools of ethos apply here. Then launch into your argument, stating the facts, making your case, proving you point logically, and smacking down your opponent’s argument. End by getting the audience all charged up, through patriotism, anger—any of the emotions that lead to action.” (Heinrichs, 284). “Think about your voice—are you loud and confident enough for the room?—and gesture. Cicero included eyes (both eye contact and expression) as an aspect of gesture. A confident voice and expressions that start with the eyes: those are the chief secrets of actio.” (Heinrichs, 293). If you arrange your argument in a way that speaks your audience’s language while still getting across what you want from them, they are more likely to listen, thus more likely to act. Remember, seduce your audience with your rhetoric. The way you deliver your argument is essentially the most important part. If you have a foolproof speech but you stand in front of you audience murmuring and shaking, no one will listen. Know what you are talking about and carry that…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kristopher, I enjoyed reading your discussion post. What I believe made Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. such an active speaker was his ardor. He wanted peace in a world filled with much hatred and anger. Dr. King appeals successfully to the people; by preaching peace, love, and unity. He persuaded his audience to see the future- how life could be if freedom would happen. King gave the people something to hope for; how the children of the future could unite as one.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John F. Kennedy’s inaugural speech is certainly one to remember. It’s memorable not for its length, but for the effective content that it beholds. He entices readers by the use of strong rhetoric techniques. His inaugural analyzes style of writing, such as diction, tropes, schemes, and syntax, and applies the concept of it effectively throughout the speech. A reader performs rhetorical analysis to examine how authors attempt to persuade their audiences by looking at the various components that make up the art of persuasion. Moreover, it is most essential to be able to understand the relationship among the speaker, subject, and audience, which President Kennedy adequately exploits in his speech.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus, Aristotle provides an introduction to his theory of rhetoric. First, it resembles the reader to deeper questions of how people can use the art of persuasion to manipulate an idea or argument. Secondly, the quote shows how Aristotle perceives rhetoric as a form of art and not as a science. According to Aristotle, the difference between science and art is that art is used everyday in any form of rhetoric speech. Lastly, the quote helps the reader understand how logic can wrongly be use through the form of rhetoric. For example, one use of persuasive speech can twist the information in someone else’s mind, to the point where one’s reality becomes someone else’s reality as well. The quote itself helps the reader understand Aristotle’s Rhetoric by providing an introduction to Aristotle’s theory of rhetoric. With Aristotle’s theory, people understand how the use of rhetoric affects their lives in the way of intellectual…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King is an expert on using strong language to effect his audience. We see this often in his speech I have a Dream, in this excerpt from the speech he mostly uses language to cause an emotional effect on his audience and to provoke action from them.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The paralyzing powers of speech often engulfs the human mind and corrupts it to the will of the speaker. Omnipresent in society, rhetorical appeals, the appealing powers of speech, are made to project the speaker’s thoughts and ideas of a subject matter. From ordinary conversations to commercial advertisements to public addresses, appeals are present to influence an audience’s mindset. The appeal of Logos creates compelling evidence for the audience to develop conclusions in the speaker’s favor while the appeal of Pathos relies on morals, values, and emotions to create a response from the audience. Combined with the appeal of Ethos to establish credibility in the speaker, the appeals are potentially powerful enough to cause everlasting impacts on society and revise history itself. Throughout history, great orators such as Hitler, Martin Luther King, and other political leaders have used the power of speech to transform people’s thoughts and ideas. This practice has dated back to ancient times to Mark Antony at the funeral of his friend and mentor, Julius Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony establishes himself to his audience, the plebeians, with Ethos then uses Pathos to pull on the audience’s heartstrings and sway the plebeians’ beliefs with Logos in an attempt to make the audience doubt Brutus’s justification of killing Caesar because he was ambitious.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to deliver a powerful speech that would move masses of people as it was his purpose, Martin Luther King performed an excellent research on the bible, the U.S constitution and The Gettysburg Address. Basing his speech on these documents allowed him to appeal to the basis by which the country of the United States was founded upon and by which society established social norms. In this way he was able to appeal to their moral, logical and emotional senses. The use of biblical…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In crafting his “I have a dream” speech, Martin Luther King Jr. relies on his credibility as a rhetor to assure his audience’s willingness not only to listen, but also to adopt his dream for the nation. MLK's life experiences helped him appeal to a broad range of audiences. Thus, Dr. King’s hereditary background, education, and occupation laid the foundation for his charisma, which informed his activism and effectiveness as a civil rights leader. Addressing an audience of hundreds of thousands of citizens is not an easy task just any orator could commence. It involves more than filling the air with positive energy and a certain sense of confidence.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony's Use of Rhetoric

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," William Shakespeare shows the power of rhetoric. Rhetoric is the ability to speak or write effectively. Shakespeare shows this power through Antony, Julius Caesar's best friend. Antony shows this at Caesar's funeral, at which Brutus, one of the conspirators who killed Caesar, allowed him to speak to the public under the condition that he not speak badly of the conspirators. Antony was a powerful speaker and was deeply gifted in the art of rhetoric. He was able to turn the public against the conspirators without breaking his promise to Brutus. Antony did this by using the techniques of ethos, pathos, and logos.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All in all Martin Luther King Jr. was an amazing man, and an amazing speaker. His use of rhetoric devices and references to both historical documents and scripture made his speeches both relatable, and very moving. To this day we still use this speech for examples of the fight for liberty, and for incredible…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics