Preview

cirrelt

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
cirrelt
_________________________________
The Inventory Replenishment Planning and Staggering Problem Revisited
Fayez F. Boctor
Marie-Claude Bolduc

May 2012

CIRRELT-2012-19

Document de travail également publié par la Faculté des sciences de l’administration de l’Université Laval, sous le numéro FSA-2012-002.

Bureaux de Montréal :

Bureaux de Québec :

Université de Montréal
C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville
Montréal (Québec)
Canada H3C 3J7
Téléphone : 514 343-7575
Télécopie : 514 343-7121

Université Laval
2325, de la Terrasse, bureau 2642
Québec (Québec)
Canada G1V 0A6
G1V 0A6
Téléphone : 418 656-2073
Télécopie : 418 656-2624

www.cirrelt.ca

The Inventory Replenishment Planning and Staggering
Problem Revisited
Fayez F. Boctor*, Marie-Claude Bolduc
Interuniversity Research Centre on Enterprise Networks, Logistics and Transportation
(CIRRELT) and Department of Operations and Decision Systems, 2325, de la Terrasse,
Université Laval, Québec, Canada G1V 0A6

Abstract. This paper reconsiders the inventory replenishment problem and emphasises the fact that it is a multi-objective problem where, in addition to minimizing the sum of order and inventory holding costs, we should optimize the usage of storage resources.
The paper proposes a mathematical formulation of the problem, suggests two heuristic solution approaches, and assesses their performance.
Keywords. Inventory replenishment planning and staggering, lot sizing, heuristics.
Acknowledgements. This research work was partially supported by grants OPG0036509 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and by a grant from Université Laval. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Results and views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of CIRRELT.
Les résultats et opinions contenus dans cette publication ne reflètent pas nécessairement la position du
CIRRELT et n



References: Anily S., 1991, Multi-item replenishment and storage problem (MIRSP): heuristics and bounds, Operations Research, 39, 233-243. Boctor F. F., 2010, Offsetting inventory replenishment cycles to minimize storage space, European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 321-325. Deb K., A. Pratap, S. Agarwal and T. Meyarivan, 2002, A fast and elitist multi-objective Genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computation, 6, Gallego G., D. Shaw, and D. Simchi-Levi, 1992.The complexity of the staggering problem and other classical inventory problems, Operations Research Letters 12, Gallego G., M. Queyranne, and D. Simchi-Levi, 1996, Single resource multi-item inventory systems, Operations Research, 44, 580-595. Goyal S.K., 1978, A note on Multi-production inventory situation with one restriction, Journal of Operational Research Society, 29, 269-271. Hall N. G., 1998, A comparison of inventory replenishment heuristics for minimizing maximum storage, American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences Hariga M.A. and P.L. Jackson, 1995, Time variant lot sizing models for the warehouse scheduling problem, IIE Transaction 27, 162-170. Kasprzak E., and K. Lewis, 2001, Pareto Analysis in Multiobjective Optimization Using the Colinearity Theorem and Scaling Method, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Konak A., D.W. Coit and A.E. Smith, 2006, Multi-objective optimization using Genetic Algorithms: A Tutorial, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 91, 992-1007. Marler R.T. and J.S. Arora, 2004, Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26, 369-395. Murthy N.N., W. C. Benton and P. A. Rubin, 2003, Offsetting inventory cycles of items sharing storage, European Journal of Operational Research, 150, 304-319. Page E. and R.J. Paul, 1976, Multi-production inventory situation with one restriction, Journal of Operational Research Society 27, 815-834. Rosenblatt M.J. and U.G. Rothblum, 1990, On the Single Resource Capacity Problem for Multi-Item Inventory Systems, Operations Research, 38, 686-693. Teo C.P., J. Ou and K. Tan, 1998, Multi-Item Inventory Staggering Problems: Heuristics and Bounds, Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, 1998, 584-593. Van Veldhuizen D.A. and G.B. Lamont, 2000, Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: Analyzing the state of the art, Evolutionary Computation, 8, 125-147. Zitzler E., K. Deb and L. Thiele, 2000, Comparison of Multi objective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results, Evolutionary Computation, 8, 173-195. Zitzler E., M. Laumanns and L. Thiele, 2001, SPEA 2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm, TIK report 103, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zoller K., 1977, Deterministic multi-item inventory systems with limited capacity, Management Science, 24, 451-455.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 9 Quiz

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    provides reliable results in cases where the distribution of items in the inventory is different from that of items sold during the period.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    unit 6 assessment

    • 2371 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Objectives can include maximising profits, minimising costs, developing new products, satisfying customers and managing risk.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    finding the best decision to optimize a linear objective subject to multiple linear constarints is referred to as…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quantitative Methods

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    e. Suppose that the values of the objective function coefficients are $4 for each All-Pro model produced and $5 for each College model. Use the graphical solution procedure to determine the new optimal solution and the corresponding value of…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Determine the criteria or criterion that will be used to evaluate the alternatives. Problems that involve identifying the best solutions with respect to one criterion is as single–criterion decision problem while multiple problems with more than one criterion are multi-criterion decision problems.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jit and Marketing Strategy

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Replace sequential optimization with global optimization. Who will optimize?Eliminate some of the ‘false’ economics that drive traditional ordering processes…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jean-Louis Denis Département d'administration de la santé, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6192 Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Canada H3C 3J7 Tel: (514)-343-6031 Fax: (514)-343-2448 jean-louis.denis@umontreal.ca Lise Lamothe Département de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4 Tel: (418)-656-2131 X5960 Fax: (418)-656-2624 lise.lamothe@mng.ulaval.ca Ann Langley Département Stratégie des affaires Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 6192 Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, Canada, H3C 4R2 Tel: (514)-987-3000 X4862 Fax: (514)-987-0422 langley.ann@uqam.ca June 2000 Final version…

    • 19721 Words
    • 79 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [72] E. Zitzler and L. Thiele, “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.,…

    • 31962 Words
    • 128 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each feasible solution is associated with a value Objective: Find a feasible solution with the best value…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simplex-Big M Method

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In fact, this notion is an old trick in optimization in general; we simply associate a penalty value with variables that we do not want to be part of an ultimate solution (unless such an outcome Is unavoidable).…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theory of Constraints

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The goal is achieved by maximizing “T”, while simultaneously minimizing “I” and “OE.” The first…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vega

    • 2067 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Multiobjective optimization is an area of multiple criteria decision making, that is concerned with mathematical optimization problems involving more than one objective function to be optimized simultaneously. Multi-objective optimization has been applied in many fields of science, including engineering, economics and logistics where optimal decisions need to be taken in the presence of trade-offs…

    • 2067 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pareto

    • 9492 Words
    • 38 Pages

    This report surveys briefly multiobjective nonlinear Pareto-optimization. The focus is on the usage of evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective decision making. The term evolutionary algorithms refer to a class of computationally intelligent algorithms, which are based on an artificial model of evolution in nature. When considering multiobjective optimization problems, the most frequently applied evolutionary optimization algorithms are genetic algorithms [Gol90] and evolution strategies [Schw95]. The purpose of this report is to serve as an initial investigation for establishing a future research project. The weight is on literature survey, finding the most important previous works, explaining the problem, methodology, terminology, classifications, concepts etc. In a nutshell, the objective is a brief up-to-date presentation of Status Quo, including the recent advances. Practical optimization problems, especially the engineering design optimization problems, seem to have a multiobjective nature much more frequently than a single objective one. Typically, some structural performance criteria are to be maximized, while the weight of the structure and the implementation costs should be minimized simultaneously. For example, consider designing the appearance of a wing for an advanced military…

    • 9492 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    – an optimal, or at least a good solution, given some objective function defined in terms…

    • 4030 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    EDPM CSEC

    • 15100 Words
    • 61 Pages

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,…

    • 15100 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays