Civil Disobedience Essay
Civil disobedience is not abiding by the laws that are placed, with an immense purpose to justify one’s action and safety in the nation. The government enforces new laws daily that impacts the country’s citizens, and there are those citizens that believe these laws need to be altered or removed permanently. As a result, the people share their voice through actions, and these actions can range from bloody brutality to peaceful reform. Overall, these civil disobedience is a genuine positive change to a certain extent. Civil disobedience is only adequate to an extent. For instance, in the late 1700s, when the British were applying heavy taxations on the tea that the colonists were buying, the colonists retaliated with the infamous Boston Tea
…show more content…
For instance, the current outbreak of riots and protests due to Donald Trump’s presidential win has innocent people getting injured as well as disruption in major cities, like Chicago. Many protesters have disturbed the peace by getting on top of public buses, as well as, creating altercations with Trump supporters. This is a good example of how civil disobedience can be violent to the point where it does not bring positive change in the government and instead is hurting non-affiliated civilians. The civil disobedience that the American people are displaying does not bring any positive reform whatsoever. Instead, the American people are only influencing violence and pushing the nation into further separation. No one is really benefiting from this form of “protesting” that the people are using as an excuse to cause anarchy. From the victory of Trump’s presidency, the frustration of the people has caused them to protest and resulted in converting anger into violence. With the protesters causing a disruption, the protests are not appropriate for showing disagreement with the election results. The people have no true reason for vandalizing city property nor causing fights with other citizens. Thus, situations such as the Trump rallies are not appropriate demonstrations of civil disobedience, and rather than fix certain problems, the negative and violent actions taken by the
For instance, the current outbreak of riots and protests due to Donald Trump’s presidential win has innocent people getting injured as well as disruption in major cities, like Chicago. Many protesters have disturbed the peace by getting on top of public buses, as well as, creating altercations with Trump supporters. This is a good example of how civil disobedience can be violent to the point where it does not bring positive change in the government and instead is hurting non-affiliated civilians. The civil disobedience that the American people are displaying does not bring any positive reform whatsoever. Instead, the American people are only influencing violence and pushing the nation into further separation. No one is really benefiting from this form of “protesting” that the people are using as an excuse to cause anarchy. From the victory of Trump’s presidency, the frustration of the people has caused them to protest and resulted in converting anger into violence. With the protesters causing a disruption, the protests are not appropriate for showing disagreement with the election results. The people have no true reason for vandalizing city property nor causing fights with other citizens. Thus, situations such as the Trump rallies are not appropriate demonstrations of civil disobedience, and rather than fix certain problems, the negative and violent actions taken by the