Preview

Civil Disobedience: Henry David Thoreau, Rosa Parks, Jr.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
666 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience: Henry David Thoreau, Rosa Parks, Jr.
Civil disobedience as a whole acts as a means of positive change in a free society. The First Amendment of the Constitution stands as a protectant to our freedom of speech and expression. In over words, civil disobedience exists as a product of our rights as an American citizen. Without this peaceful resistance to unjust laws, we would be tied down to regulations that serve to endanger and infringe upon the freedom our founding fathers fought for. Though out history, civil heros such as Henry David Thoreau, Rosa Parks, and Martin Luther King Jr serve to reflect the positive impact and enhanced freedom brought to life by civil disobedience.

As early as 1849, people were beginning to find fault in their government and its means of controlling its citizens. In Civil Disobedience, Henry David Thoreau brings to light the faults in the leading powers of
…show more content…

Martin Luther King Jr, a man made famous by his use of civil disobedience throughout the civil rights movement, displays his viewpoints on the method in Letter from a Birmingham Jail. In the fourth paragraph of the letter, he claims that "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere", heightening the importance of civil disobedience when it comes to unjust and unfair laws. Later in the letter, he states: "Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored". King's powerful statements accompanied by the severity of the issues of his time reflect the dire need for civil disobedience when it comes to the evolution of a country and its government. His message and actions exist as a perfect example of how actions such as boycotts, sit-ins. and all other forms of peaceful protest can correlate towards positive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. was the acknowledged leader of the American Civil Rights Movement. King earned several degrees and was a bright man. His “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was written in April 1963, while he was in jail in Birmingham, Alabama, for acts of civil disobedience (499). His letter is a response to a letter signed by clergyman criticizing his actions towards civil rights. The clergymen believed that his actions were “untimely.” King states ,”if I sought to answer all the criticisms that cross my desk…I would have no time for constructive work” (500). He usually does not respond to letter that criticize his work and actions, but he believed the clergymen were men of genuine good and they meant no harm. King was president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and they had affiliates all throughout the South. King believed he was supposed to spread freedom. He agreed that if Birmingham ever needed him that he would be there. “Injustice everywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (500). King used an approach to resolve issues in nonviolent manners. It consisted of sit-ins, marches, and etc. Nonviolent direct action would create a tension that an otherwise ignored subject would have to be faced. With nonviolent direct action and ignored issue would come to light and can no longer be ignored(502). After the direct-action program, King hoped that the doors to negotiation would open.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr was a leader of the American civil right movement. He advocated for the use of nonviolent civil disobedience based on his Christian beliefs. He was arrested during a campaign against racial segregation in Birmingham, Alabama. His actions during that campaign were seen as illegal. While imprisoned there, he wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” to defend his position, specifically against the rejections of certain conformist church leaders. In that letter he passionately argued in favor of the use of civil disobedience to fight unjust laws. He was disappointed on how some representatives of the Christian church would blindly agree to obey the laws even if they went against Christian teachings. He defended certain extremists’…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. was an advocate of nonviolence, a proponent of peace, and pursued social justices in the civil rights era directly and nonviolently. In his Letter from Birmingham Jail and through his countless marches and speeches, he was able to show how nonviolence can be used to combat the social injustices taking place throughout the nation. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote the Letter from Birmingham Jail on…

    • 3564 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without civil disobedience it’s impossible to see where we would be today. The first act of civil disobedience was the Boston Tea Party. On December, 16, 1773 the group Sons of Liberty created a political demonstration against the Tea Act. The Tea Act was an unfair tax used to make us pay for their war. This is one of many times we were treated differently and unfairly than citizens living in Britain. The act of throwing tea into the harbor ignited tension for more people to protest and overthrow the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” uses emotional and logical appeals in response to criticism from white clergymen of his actions, and though in jail King explains in an open, personal, diplomatic, heartfelt and completely inoffensive manner why he believes in the validity for civil disobedience and for nonviolent action.…

    • 2069 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, in his essay, civil disobedience, argues that when a person is not in comfort with the government, then we have a right as humans to act against its injustice. Thoreau supports his argument by first stating that unjust laws exist and that we shall endeavor to amend them instead of being content to obey them. His purpose is to inform the reader about the way they are being mistreated by government and to persuade them to act against their injustices in a civil disobedient way inn order to see the government acting up more rapidly and systematically. Thoreau establishes a critical and righteous tone for those who are against…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” inspired a revolution of men to do what is right. His term: civil disobedience, refers to people protesting unjust laws by refusing to comply with them. This process is not just for any laws and practices but ones that cannot be resolved by the Democratic process. In his time, Thoreau referred to slavery and the Mexican-American War. Thoreau found both of these pieces of history to be hypocritical of the United States moral values. The United States stands for the home of the free when, in fact, they enslaved people. He refused to be a part of the government and He showed his civil disobedience by not paying taxes. He was put in jail for this, saying: “Under a government which imprisons any unjustly,…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is using nonviolent protest to boycott government in an attempt to influence the legislation to change the policy. Henry David Thoreau created a writing called "Civil Disobedience", talking about its meaning and how he had experienced civil disobedience. He had been sent to jail for not paying a poll-tax for six years (Thoreau par. 7). When he was released, he paid the tax; obeying the law, but had still thought that government is biased for making him pay it (McElroy par. 2). Wendy McElroy stated "He listened to the inner voice of his conscience, a voice all men possess but few men follow (McElroy par. 5). Thoreau listened to his belief and did not pay the tax because he did not believe it was something that he should have to do. Overall, Thoreau was a simple man who relied on nonviolent nature and his own beliefs to disobey the government and its laws. Thoreau would have recognized the Singing Revolution in Europe and the Kent State University protestors as significant acts of civil disobedience considering…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Civil Disobedience,” Henry David Thoreau focuses his ideas around the central theme, “It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.” He defines man as a person who listens and acts to his conscience and states that if man obeys laws opposing his conscience, such as laws created by legislators, then he is no better than an animal.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thoreau uses tone and imagery to make his theme stronger in Civil Disobedience. He uses the rhetorical devices in a convincing matter.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, Civil Disobedience, Henry David Thoreau introduced his audience to his personal thoughts regarding the injustice of the American government. Moreover, he sought to encourage individual action to boycott any law or institution instilled by the government that was in any way conflicting with a person’s beliefs. A true revolutionary at heart, Thoreau put his words into action by refusing to pay his poll tax for 6 years and was forced to spend the night in jail because of it. Rather than seeking reform by cooperating with the corrupt institutions of his time, he refused to become a part of them and condemned their existence.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The laws and regulations that have been set on our country are primarily what the government see as appealing to the American public. Much like in the Mexican American War which Thoreau referes to show that the majority is capable of taking over authority. In the essay he also referes to slavery to prove the same point. In Civil Disobedience Henry David Thoreau's argument that the American people should question the government and it's authority is logical because it shows that the public has more of a say and that the actions of the men fighting show more American customs than the actual government.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to understand Thoreau’s claim, we must first understand what civil disobedience is. Many people assume that the “civil” part of civil disobedience means that the disobedience is “courteous and polite.” This assumption isn’t necessarily true, however, because, in this case, “civil” retains its original meaning: “of or relating to the state.” (The “civil” in civil rights means the same thing.) Therefore, civil disobedience literally means “the act of…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Thoreau considers civil disobedience as a duty rather than a right because he believes that the individual should “make known what kind of government would command his respect,” which “will be one step toward obtaining it” (941). When a civil law, or a law established by the government contradicts with the divine law, it becomes a duty for an individual to disobey the civil law. In his essay, Thoreau describes majority of the men as “machines,” serving the state “not as merely as men mainly” (941). Thoreau believes that in order to preserve the moral sense of the individual, civil disobedience is necessary and it is the duty of the people to go against the civil law.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Government and Higher Law. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau's basic premise is that a higher law than civil law demands the obedience of the individual. Human law and government are subordinate. In cases where the two are at odds with one another, the individual must follow his conscience and, if necessary, disregard human law.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays