Preview

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
204 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
“Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau warns its readers that we are at the mercy of our government and have no power as a minority that conforms to the majority, which represses our desire to resist the wrongs we believe in without the support of the masses. The place for an honorable, just man is within prison, which he explains through his personal experience. In part 1, Thoreau exposes how the government is without a conscience, susceptible to corruption for their own advantage, and are served not by men but by “machines” (5). We are left “to the mercy of chance” under the power of the majority. Part 2 explains that Thoreau didn’t believe in the voting system so would not pay poll tax, and was sent to jail only to find that he felt more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tim Dechristopher

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thoreau, a Harvard philosopher, wrote in 1849 an essay explaining himself, who spent a night in jail to protest taxes that funded the Mexican-American War. Likewise, Tim Dechristopher, an environmental activist in 2008, disrupted the bid for oil drilling leases, to hinder and protest the destruction of the environment. Thoreau explains his antithesis, “If [U.S. Citizens] pay the tax from a mistaken interest in the individual taxes, to save his property, or prevent his going to jail, it is because they have not considered wisely how far they let their private feelings interfere with the public good” (Thoreau 3, 10). Hence, he states that doing unjust and illegal activities is justifiable, if it boosts public welfare. Similarly, Dechristopher’s illegal act of fraud is justified in the New York Times article, “Activist said the sale would threaten Utah’s wild lands and spoil the view from some of the state’s spectacular national parks with drilling rigs” (Associated Press 11). As many environmental activists agree, the public welfare of the people relies on the health of the environment. Seeing Dechristopher verbally support his own act of civil disobedience, and in like manner, Thoreau justifying his act and accepting it, it is deducted that they are both embodiments of civil disobedience. If civil disobedience was construed, Thoreau and…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 2008, appellant Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation, released a documentary (hereinafter Hillary) critical of then- Senator Hillary Clinton, a candidate for her party’s Presidential nomination. Anticipating that it would make Hillary available on cable television through video-on-demand within 30 days of primary elections, Citizens United produced television ads to run on broadcast and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re- lief, arguing that (1) §441b is unconstitutional as applied to Hillary; and (2) BCRA’s disclaimer, disclosure, and reporting requirements, BCRA §§201 and 311, were unconstitutional as applied to Hillary and the ads. The District Court denied Citizens United a prelimi- nary injunction and granted appellee Federal Election Commission (FEC) summary judgment.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These lines are from Thoreau’s essay, Civil Disobedience. In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau speaks out in a personal voice, where he exemplifies the Transcendentalist movement and philosophy he follows. The tone of these lines are portrayed by the use of the language, which indirectly describes that he feels negatively toward the State “forcing” people to live their life in in accordance to the set regulations of the State. In these particular lines, he demonstrates his opinion on how he will not be forced by the State to conform to society, and suggests that people should not live a forced life. He writes “They force me to become like themselves”, which directly shows how the State is pressuring Thoreau to abide their laws and rules.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human law and government are subordinate and antagonists to each other. Thoreau proposes that in an instance when each odd is against one another, an individual must choose their own moral path instead of the government path if necessary. Thoreau explains that people are not put in this world to make it a better place to live in, rather than to simply live it. He then describes that it is not man’s duty to devote himself to the moral wrong. It is man’s duty to avoid the moral wrong. For instance, if the government tells you to either kill your family members or be sent to jail, it is your duty to obey your conscience. Furthermore, Thoreau explains that the majority is not always correct either and thus, do not accurately determine justice. Although government has a place in human existence, man must eventually follow his own moral decisions and disregard human…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, was an unconventional thinker who expressed his ideas about major issues such as war, slavery, wealth, taxes, friendship, vegetarianism, and the lessons that nature can teach. Thoreau was an important transcendentalist writer in the early nineteenth century. During the Mexican American war, Thoreau refused to pay a poll tax and while he was in a protest against slavery, he was arrested. He was thrown into jail for one night and later writes about how the government could be better. I agree that Thoreau’s ideas about how a government should be more better is a excellent postulation and I would further add the government today in the twenty first century still hasn’t even changed at all.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you react to people fighting with nonviolence? Would you support them or fight them? After the death of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. one of his supporters, Cesar Chavez wrote about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s accomplishments in teaching people how to fight with nonviolence. Chavez…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “But, to speak practically and as a citizen unlike those who call themselves no-government men, I ask for not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it (Thoreau) ”…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book “ 50 Essays” by Samuel Cohen : “ Civil Disobedience” by Charles Thoreau, “Letter from Birmingham” by Martin Luther King Jr., and “ Civil Disobedience: Destroyer of Democracy” by Lewis H. Van Dusen Jr. , and with each of these essays they use different ways throughout their essays to persuade the readers. I will be discussing the different appeals that each Author uses to draw in their audience by using ethos,logos,pathos,and Kairos. Each appeal has a different meanings, and as well a different way of connecting with its audience. Thoreau and Van Dusen uses similar forms of persuasion to obtain their audience's attention throughout the essays.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau expresses his strong disapproval of the American government. He even makes the following statement: "the best government is the one that governs the least." This quote shows us that Thoreau really does have a strong dislike for the government and that he will rebel against it. Thoreau does in fact rebel against the government by not paying his taxes. This causes him to suffer one night in jail. In his isolation, he is able to think, and concludes that he would rather be in jail than out in the real world.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thoreau has had a large impact on American culture and society since he was alive, his writings and beliefs are very indicative of the way many people feel about the government today. He was very cynical towards the government and the belief that the government should not have more power than necessary. Thoreau believed that people should be able to make their own decisions and take ahold of their beliefs in order to live their lives unrestricted. This has come to be the thought of many Americans today, many believe that the government should have limited power and not be allowed to make decisions for its citizens. One of Thoreau’s main issues is the Mexican-American War, is he…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government was charging a poll-tax on the citizens in Massachusetts. A poll-tax was a “per head” tax imposed on all citizens to help support the war in Mexico (Jacobus, 302). Because Thoreau did not agree with the war, he did not feel it necessary to pay the poll-tax. Thoreau contends, “I have paid no poll-tax in six years. I was put into a jail once on this account, for one night; and as I stood considering the walls of solid stone, two or three feet thick, the door of wood and iron, a foot thick, and the iron grating which strained the light, I could not help being struck by the foolishness of that institution which treated me as I were mere flesh and blood and bones, to be locked up” (316). He continued, “I did not for a moment feel confined, and the walls seemed a great waist of stone and mortar” (316). Thoreau stood up for what he thought to be morally correct, and being put in the county jail was not going to stop him. He was considered the minority but he was not concerned with that. He knew that in order to make a change, you had to be a part of it. Thoreau used his words to convince his audience that it was their ethical responsibility to stand up against the immoral…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On November 21, 2017 millions of people marched the streets of Washington, D.C., to protest the recently elected President Donald Trump. The protestors were protesting his views on women’s rights, health care, and immigration among other things. People like “members of Congress, world-famous actresses and countless citizens like Joanne Gascoyne of Albany, New York a 78-year-old retired teacher who traveled to New York City with her daughter and two granddaughters” came to protest the rights of women. The Women’s March was caused due to various remarks trump made over his campaign which has instilled fear in many Americans that he will make attacks on women’s rights. The protest didn’t only happen in D.C., but also all over the States and the world. Countries such as Australia, U.K., Japan, France, Germany, Greece,…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience espouses the need to prioritize one's conscience over the dictates of laws. It criticizes American social institutions and policies. He contends that people's first obligation is to do what they believe is right and not to follow the law dictated by the majority. When a government is unjust, people should refuse to follow the law and distance themselves from the government in general. A person is not obligated to devote his or her life to eliminating evils from the world, but he or she is obligated not to participate in such evils(SparkNotes.com).Does…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malcolm X and MLK disagreed on whether to use violence or use civil disobedience.This was a huge topic among civil rights leaders in the 60s.Should we fight back or should we just stand there and do nothing?A lot of the people knew that if they chose to fight back then they will die.On the other hand, if they did not fight back, then some of them will still die.That was the biggest decision people would make; if we are going to die then we might as well die fighting.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays