Preview

Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis
In the book “ 50 Essays” by Samuel Cohen : “ Civil Disobedience” by Charles Thoreau, “Letter from Birmingham” by Martin Luther King Jr., and “ Civil Disobedience: Destroyer of Democracy” by Lewis H. Van Dusen Jr. , and with each of these essays they use different ways throughout their essays to persuade the readers. I will be discussing the different appeals that each Author uses to draw in their audience by using ethos,logos,pathos,and Kairos. Each appeal has a different meanings, and as well a different way of connecting with its audience. Thoreau and Van Dusen uses similar forms of persuasion to obtain their audience's attention throughout the essays.

Thoreau and Van Dusen both tend to lean more towards the use of logos in their essays. In both essays they are both against the American government's laws, and stupidity and injustice within the laws. They both say that the American government is useless, and they are only there to work against you through the passing of unnecessary laws. As Therou states “ The Government itself, which is only the mode which people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and inverted before the people can act through it.” What Thoreau is trying to say here is that people put most of their trust into the government, and they always take our rights and suppress them
…show more content…

Henry David Thoreau, Lewis H. Van Dusen, and Martin Luther King Jr. all three found a way to show their messages through the different forms of persuasion in writing. By using the different way to draw in their audience they have shown to their readers that the power of persuasion, and the ability to stand for what is right you can accomplish almost anything. If Dr. King can help end the everlasting feud between African Americans and Whites with the power of what is right then anything can be accomplished with the right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his speech, John Lewis acknowledges the support the marchers have towards the civil rights movement, but also states its limitations. Lewis does this by proclaiming that the marchers “support [the civil rights bill] with great reservations” (para 2). In other words, Lewis is trying to convey a sense of doubt and the idea that there are flaws in the civil rights bill. Lewis brings up this idea to ensure that the audience is aware that the fight for rights is not over yet. Furthermore, Lewis includes the use of imagery and rhetorical question to connect to the audience in the sense of pathos. The essence of Lewis’ argument was to make known how the journey to civil rights was still not complete. From this, readers can learn how important…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau is one of the most interesting men I have ever encountered in my readings. Thoreau decided to isolate himself from all of civilization, far away from any neighborhood, town, business or governing body. In doing so he wished to discover what mankind could not teach him. In Walden and Civil Disobedience, he recorded his findings.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 2008, appellant Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation, released a documentary (hereinafter Hillary) critical of then- Senator Hillary Clinton, a candidate for her party’s Presidential nomination. Anticipating that it would make Hillary available on cable television through video-on-demand within 30 days of primary elections, Citizens United produced television ads to run on broadcast and cable television. Concerned about possible civil and criminal penalties for violating §441b, it sought declaratory and injunctive re- lief, arguing that (1) §441b is unconstitutional as applied to Hillary; and (2) BCRA’s disclaimer, disclosure, and reporting requirements, BCRA §§201 and 311, were unconstitutional as applied to Hillary and the ads. The District Court denied Citizens United a prelimi- nary injunction and granted appellee Federal Election Commission (FEC) summary judgment.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you react to people fighting with nonviolence? Would you support them or fight them? After the death of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. one of his supporters, Cesar Chavez wrote about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s accomplishments in teaching people how to fight with nonviolence. Chavez…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This passage is a very powerful one because Thoreau does not badger the government. Instead of saying that the government should change one thing into another thing he suggests that the government should re-evaluate something that needs change, and asks the government officials to take other viewpoints into consideration. In modern times, people have shown how uneducated are by having the audacity to say things like our country would be better off without a government. When people make statements like this, or take a similar approach towards a topic, they show how truly uneducated they are. Without a government, our country would be in complete havoc and turmoil. The mindsets of people in the 1500’s were completely different to the mindsets of people now. In today’s world, people have become accustomed to a society that is filled with drama and sarcasm. Because of this, people are constantly ridiculed and have learned to ignore the opinions of others. In the 1500’s the people wouldn’t make unrealistic statements because they didn’t want their opinion being made a joke, and would feel both humiliated and embarrassed if they were ridiculed by their…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King jr. and Jonathan Swift, both persuasive writers and speakers, write for a very similar purpose; they wish to 'free the oppressed.' It is interesting that they induce their audience in practically opposite ways. King condemns the oppressors, spreading the message of hope to the oppressed while Swift uses more of the reverse psychology approach.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mohandas Gandhi 's, "Satyagraha," and Martin Luther King Jr. 's, "Letter from Birmingham Jail," each argue for non-violent civil disobedience. However, each author uses different rhetorical appeals, such as ethos, to establish their credibility. In paragraph ten of King 's statement he asks rhetorical questions the Clergymen might have. "You may well ask: "Why direct action? Why sit-ins, marches and so forth? Isn 't negotiation a better path"(King 2)? Gandhi also does a great job of breaking down the complexity of his argument by separating his "new terms" and defining them one by one. With these two aspects in mind the authors set out their framework for their argument and presented it in their own way with their own style.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On November 21, 2017 millions of people marched the streets of Washington, D.C., to protest the recently elected President Donald Trump. The protestors were protesting his views on women’s rights, health care, and immigration among other things. People like “members of Congress, world-famous actresses and countless citizens like Joanne Gascoyne of Albany, New York a 78-year-old retired teacher who traveled to New York City with her daughter and two granddaughters” came to protest the rights of women. The Women’s March was caused due to various remarks trump made over his campaign which has instilled fear in many Americans that he will make attacks on women’s rights. The protest didn’t only happen in D.C., but also all over the States and the world. Countries such as Australia, U.K., Japan, France, Germany, Greece,…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    compare contrast

    • 1356 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A speech, or formal address delivered to an audience, has many purposes. It can be used to inform people and increase awareness on topics or to teach and demonstrate things. Speeches can also persuade people to make a change and can be entertaining. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech and Sojourner Truth’s”Ain’t I a Woman” speech both appeal to their audience through the art of persuasion through the use of various compositional features. Both M.L.K’s “I Have A Dream” speech and Truth’s ”Ain’t I a Woman” speech capture and motivate their respective audiences for change but both authors are similar and also differ in their compositional techniques to reach their audiences. Sojourner Truth’s sarcastic yet bluntly honest speech makes quick and active use of repetition, ethos, and personal anecdotes to reach her listeners. King’s speech, on the other hand, passionately and eloquently implements the use of repetition, logos, and personal and historical references.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a good thing, and indeed a necessary thing, until it is no longer civil. Such prominent civil disobedience advocates in our world’s history, such as Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr., understood this principle; this belief in civility amidst disobedience for social justice guided their respected movements. However, the argument can be effectively put forth today that such principle is lacking in the modern employments of civil disobedience. Once the understanding of civility is lost, civil disobedience is no longer civil, and therefore no longer good for our society.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Struggle For Human Rights: A Neo-Aristotelian Analysis Krystle Bono Human Rights have been something we have fought for as a country--as well as internationally--for decades. Many people have advocated for these rights to be universal; some of those people were prominent figures in society and chose to use their status for the greater good. Former First Lady, Eleanor Roosevelt, was one of those people who, as a household name, became one of the most outspoken women in the history of American politics. In September 28, 1948, she delivered the speech, “The Struggle for Human Rights", to an audience in Paris, France. Using the Neo-Aristotelian method of speech criticism, I will use the five canons of classical rhetoric, as well as the rhetorical devices of ethos, logos, pathos, to determine the logistics of how Roosevelt addressed her targeted audience and how she ultimately persuaded her listeners to fight toward ubiquitous acceptance of human rights and natural freedoms.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control laws, abortion rights, death sentences, and gay rights all compromise the morals of certain groups. However, certain rights, such as gun control and gay rights, are supported simply because of the revered words of the Bible and Constitution, as Thoreau described. Thus, “Civil Disobedience” constructs an outline as to when an oppressed American such as me should rebel. I should rebel when I must “resign my conscious to the legislator,” compromising my morals simply because I was a minority voter. I should rebel when the government controls me, because I should control the government. I should rebel when the government refuses to be an advocate for change; it is up to me to take up action. In brief, it is my duty as a citizen to ensure the fair implication of government rather than a toleration.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience Essay

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The subject of civil disobedience is a controversial topic, one that sparks much debate. On one hand, one could argue that protesting or actively disobeying a law one sees as unjust threatens the legal system and, in turn, negatively impacts society. However, history has shown that, in cases of unjust laws, civil disobedience provides the pressure that pushes open the door to change. A free society is based on the ideals of equal rights and opportunities for all. People are inherently flawed, and since the government is comprised of people, it is subject to potential corruption. This corruption can result in unjust laws. Unjust laws go against, or threaten, the ideals of a free society. In such instances, it becomes necessary to take action…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Purpose This persuasive analysis seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of the speech by Martin Luther King Jr entitled “I Have a Dream,” which he delivered on August 28, 1963 at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in front of an enthralled crowd. This speech had a remarkable impact both nationally and internationally since it addressed some of the contentious social issues that were affecting the nation during that time. The analysis will primarily focus on the specific elements employed in the speech including heuristic processing, systematic processing, and the semantic elements that compose the persuasive nature of the speech from both the orator’s perspective and the recipient’s perspective. It will also dissect some myths that are evident in the speech such as the American dream, race, as well as identity.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    speech analysis

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the course of history, there have been copious amounts of famous speeches, given by many different people. From political figures to sports players, these people have provided deep thoughts and great insights about who they are and the world we live in today. Speeches also play an important and powerful role in both persuading and convincing large groups of people. Adolf Hitler, for example, somehow managed to persuade much of Germany to follow his beliefs, and actually convinced them to perform unspeakable actions towards his enemies. Even today, there are political figures around the world who utilize the power of speech to induce people into supporting their party in elections. Although powerful, constructing an effective and persuasive speech can prove to be difficult. To form a powerful oration, the speaker must consider what diction they will use, the organization of their speech, and the rhetorical devices they will implement. Specifically, Lou Gehrig’s Farewell speech, Mark Twain’s speech to Ms. Tewksbury’s School for Girls, Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, and finally Sojourner Truth’s “Ain’t I a Woman?” speech, are all excellent examples of using effective diction and rhetorical devices. Each oration was brilliantly constructed to persuade each of their audiences, and they each share similarities as well as differences.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays