Preview

Civil War, Religion or Economy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1279 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War, Religion or Economy
To what extent do you accept Lawrence Stone’s view that religion rather than economic interests influenced the taking of sides among the gentry in 1642?

Religion was a huge part of 17th century England, and can be seen as one of the highest contributing factors to the civil war. Most of the country consisted of Protestants with a minority of Catholics, however this did not mean there was no friction between the two.

The religious quarrels began right at the start of Charles' reign, when Charles married Henrietta Maria, a French Catholic. Although Charles didn't choose to marry her - his father, James, set up the marriage - the public, especially the Puritans, didn't like having a Catholic as Queen. A few extremists even saw this as a sign that Charles was secretly Catholic! After the King dissolved Parliament, he made William Laud the Archbishop of Canterbury, in 1633. While Laud was Archbishop, he made many changes to the Church. Most of these changes involved beatifying the Church and bringing back robes for priests, statues and stained-glass windows. All these things reminded the English of Catholicism, and it did not please the Presbyterians (puritans) who believed that church should just be about “you” and God, no extravagance was required and it was considered to be unnecessary.

In 1636, Archbishop Laud decided to introduce the English Prayer Book (which stated how services should be run) into Scotland. There was nationwide rioting, because no one wanted to follow the new Prayer Book. Scotland was a Presbyterian (Puritan) country, and they thought that the English Prayer Book was far too Catholic to use in Scotland. This eventually led to many Scots, called the Covenanters, marching down the country in an attempt to invade England. At this point, Charles had to call Parliament to ask for taxes to pay for the war, but was horrified to see that most of the MPs were on the Covenanters' side. Parliament agreed that the Prayer Book was too Catholic, so

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    It is possible to perceive that England was torn apart by religious revolution as a consequence of the public risings in the response to the changes. After their introduction, the country suffered from a number of rebellions, most significantly the Western rebellion- also known as the Prayer Book rebellion. During the Somerset protectorate of Edward’s rule, the Act of Uniformity was introduced and consequently the English version of the Common Prayer Book as opposed to the Latin variant- an act that proved to be the primary cause of the Western rebellion. The dispute was then antagonised by the harsh enforcement of religious changes by William Body and the demands from the rebels to reintroduce Catholicism and its rituals, such as the use of Latin in services. However, although this uprising resulted in a 3000 strong protest, it only occurred in the South of the country, suggesting that support for the rebellion wasn’t national. Other negative responses to the introduction of the Common Prayer book include non-attendance at church services- an act sufficient enough for it to be noted and to prompt government action.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap American History Dbq

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the 1630 's, there was a religious civil war. This war was between the Puritans, also known as the Protestants, and the Cavaliers, also known as the Catholics. This relgious war lasted from the year 1642 until the year of 1651. During this time, King Charles I was the monarch of England. His father, James I was ruler prior. James did not change anything about England after Queen Elizabeth 's death. He did not change the government, nor the religion. Unlike his father, Charles believed that Catholicism must be enforced in England. Because of Charles and his changing of religion, the civil war in England took place.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main reasons why Charles and Parliament failed to reach a settlement was due to religion, especially with the division between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The differences between the two were that Political Presbyterians favoured a negotiated peace with Charles and did not approve of the New Model Army, and were also drawn more closely to the Presbyterian Scots whereas the Political Independents were in favour of a more considerable measure of religious toleration and disliked the authoritarianism of Scottish Presbyterianism. This division throughout Parliament meant that they had failed to reach a settlement negotiating peace terms that was to be decided upon them. In July 1646, the Political Presbyterians had presented Charles with the Newcastle Propositions as their plan for settlement which consisted of severe terms such as Charles was to accept Presbyterianism for three years in England, Parliament was to have control of the militia for 20 years, and the Triennial Act was not to be abolished and to have regular parliaments. Charles rejected these terms of the Newcastle Propositions and instead offered counter-proposals suggesting that the…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apush Chapter 2 Notes

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Religious conflict, moreover, disrupted England in midcentury, after King Henry VIII broke with the Roman Catholic Church in the 1530s, launching the English Protestant Reformation.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Charles became King in 1625 he favoured the principles of Arminianism – he placed order and uniformity above tact – despite many of members of Parliament, and the English society, preferred Puritanism. Throughout the beginning of Charles’ rule he would encourage and promote Arminianism, even those who openly attacked Puritans through writing. For example, in 1926, Laud began to provoke parliament by saying in a sermon ‘Puritans were meditating a revolution in both the state and the church’; instead of punishing Laud, Charles would eventually give him the title as Chancellor of Oxford University, and then went on to become the Archbishop of Canterbury. Another example is an Arminian cleric Richard Montagu, he wrote ‘An Old Gag for a New Goose’ and ‘Appello Caesarem’, which stressed the similarities between Catholicism and the Church of England, Charles would appoint him Royal Chaplain in 1625. Puritans around this time believed the Pope, leader of the Catholic Church was the antichrist or devil and so being compared to the Catholics was an unforgiveable insult; also to appoint Montagu as the Royal Chaplain meant that Charles identified Arminianism as the religion of England, this would only cause further tension with Puritans and Parliament. Charles also antagonized Parliament by getting Laud to preach the opening sermon, and stressing obedience to the King and supported Royal Prerogative and Divine Right; these actions saw Charles as pro- catholic, which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I began to move towards “popery” through his backing of William Laud, the archbishop of Canterbury, in imposing ornate ceremonies into the Church of England (The Making of the West 515). The harsh treatment of his opposition, Puritan critics, was not received well. After refusing to “call Parliament into session” until 1640, the divide between Puritans, who controlled Parliament and Charles I grew (The Making of the West 514). The Puritans feared the reinstatement of Catholicism.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were a few people who wanted to see the process of taking Catholicism out of England occur more quickly. These people were called Puritans.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Reformation was the driving force behind English Catholic dissenters, many of which would eventually form the base of groups heading for new lands to find religious freedom. These people would come to be called Puritans and their goal was to purify the Church of England. They wanted to do away with the “offensive” features such as Church hierarchy and traditional rituals of Catholic worship in order to promote a relationship between the individual and his relationship with God. Through English rulers King Henry the VIII to Elisabeth I to King James, the Puritans never really found a strong foothold for their practices. When King James’ son, Charles I came into power, a ruler that was strongly anti-Puritan and enforced conformity to the Church of England, Puritans began making plans to escape the persecution in England for the new world where they hoped to build new colonies to practice their faiths. Two of these groups, one to land at Plymouth and another to arrive at Massachusetts Bay, were prime examples of Puritans seeking to find a new life outside of England (or more specifically, the Church of England.)…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mid Tudor Crisis Essay

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many religious people were unhappy with the current state of the church as there were less people leaving money in their wills for the Church – only 32% of people during Edwards reign. This upset was also portrayed through the western rebellion which was defiance against the 1547 Act of Uniformity, conveying how discontent the nation were with the religion change that was continued on by Edward II. However, the rebellion didn’t amount to anything so had little achievements and was suppressed easily. Although under Edwards’s reign people were discontent, there also was a strong feeling of anticlericalism of which meant that there was an increasing amount of people in favour of the change than there had been in previous times. The fact that people were practising Protestantism conveys how there was not actually a mid-Tudor crisis due to the fact that some were content with the new religion and were happy to follow it. When Mary came to power the change back to Catholicism can be argued to have made the nation discontent due to the lack of consistency within the crown, however most were willing to embrace the religion and it was apparent that Henry received a much larger revolt a few years prior. The Wyatt rebellion started due to the disapproval of the marriage with the Catholic Prince…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, it has been argued that Charles was to blame for the long-term reasons such as wanting to make changes to religion, the power of the king and money. For example, Charles was partly to blame for money because he was trying to buy off the Scottish with £850 a day (which he could not afford) as a result from trying to make the Scottish Puritans. They rebelled and tried to attack. Charles was partly to blame for religious reasons like the one above, and some other reasons as well. He made William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury and he tried to make England a Catholic country. Also, he married a woman named Henrietta Maria. She was a Catholic, so naturally Parliament were concerned that England was going to return to Catholicism. Charles was to blame because of power. He let his friends help him with important decisions and Power. People did not approve of some of the choices they made such as raising taxes.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War-Causes.

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Question- How valid is this statement? By the 1850's the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created. 1987 AP US History DBQ Essay.…

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religious persecution was an undeniable contribution to the harsh sentencing of King Charles I. At one point in history, the King attempted to force his Episcopalian beliefs upon the Scots by implementing mandatory non-catholic scriptures in every service (United Kingdom). This infuriated the Scots, as well as most other Catholics in England; people began to flee the country in order to practice religion freely (Charles I, The Columbia Encyclopedia, 7803). Eventually, Charles and those who supported the Royalists went to war with the English Parliament. Even after losing a battle with the Parliamentary Forces in 1646 (which cost the English many casualties), the King refused to surrender. Some people believed that the royal defeat was a…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you go to a restaurant and it was for favorite but they change a recipe and you get food poisoning you are probably not going eat there again. You don’t like how there doing things now so your going to a different restaurant maybe even start your own? Well that’s kind of what happened to the Englishmen noting really to do with the food but the rules and the restrictions on religion and that is why they settled in north America .King James did not believe in a real religion but he believed in divine right of kings . He taught he was entitled to disobey parliament because he did not answer to anybody but god. He started fights and caused tension with parliament and gained an advantage under Charles Is reign. This started a civil war which…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Political Causes

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There were many economic and political causes of the Civil War in the terms of conflict over economic policy and the expansion of slavery into the territories. Many documents, people, and events in history help to causes of the Civil War such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Missouri Compromise, Texas annexation, Wilmot Proviso, Compromise of 1850, Gadsden Purchase, the creation of the Republican Party, and the Dred Scott decision. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1854. The act allowed people in the territories(states) of Kansas and Nebraska to have the right to decide for themselves whether or not they would allow slaves within their borders. The purpose of the act was to repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which wouldn’t…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, Charles made his subjects and Parliament turn to his new religion, which was blindly Catholic, however they rebelled against him leading to a civil war. Charles I married Henrietta Maria of France, who was a Catholic whereas Charles was a Protestant, this brought suspicion amongst his people, particularly the Parliament, who were all Puritans (strict Protestants). His subjects and the Parliament were curious if he could be a secret Catholic. He appointed William Laud as Archbishop of Canterbury, who in couple years in his position, he told off the Puritans for being too strict! This irritated the Parliament very much, because there were already problems with money, and power involving Charles I. Furthermore, Laud and Charles I introduced a new prayer book, which looked tremendously similar to the Catholic prayer book, they tried to make the Scottish to use the new prayer book, however they did not accept it, therefore the civil war began.…

    • 667 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays