Preview

Civil War Vs South's Industrial Economy Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War Vs South's Industrial Economy Analysis
3.Due to the substantial differences between the North’s industrial economy and the South’s agricultural economy they both had distinct advantages and disadvantages during the war. To begin with, the North’s economy was far superior to the South’s because the North had two-thirds of the nation’s population, two-thirds of the railroad mileage, and almost 90% of the nation’s industrial output. Also, many of the North’s arm factories were equipped with mass production which allowed them to compete with the gun manufacturing centers and armories of the South. The Northern economy helped them have much greater supply of resources compared to the South. On the other hand, the Confederacy had slaves which helped provide food for the army and provide the most important good of all, cotton. The South was able to use cotton as diplomatic weapon which they thought they could use to persuade France or Britain to assist or side with the Confederacy. We can also see this as a disadvantage to the Northern economy because they had no such tool or weapon to use to obtain foreign assistance or aid. Unfortunately this same advantage for the South also led to a severe disadvantage. Because the majority of the people living in the South did not own slaves, they were not the ones producing cotton. This meant that the majority of the …show more content…
Even though the Proclamation did not change anyone’s status it still influenced slaves to attempt to desert their plantations which not only helped end slavery, but also gave the North an advantage over the South as the slaves did a lot of the South’s labor and so without them the South would be weakened, allowing the North to win the war, which would allow them to have the jurisdiction make all the remaining slaves freedmen or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This book focuses on the of number southern black and white who opposed the confedecy. He documented in The Road to Disunion, that anti-Confederates got strength from the weakness of slavery in the Border South, while slavery stunted population growth. The author argues that the varying support of the upper and lower South contributed to the fall of the Confederacy placing most of the blame on anti confederalist. He states that anti-Confederate whites undermined the Confederacy by remaining outside the nation while slaves unified form within and enlisted into the Union Army. Both groups guaranteed that the Union would have more men for the army which cause the Confederacy to lose because anti-Confederates waged war against Confederate southerners. That author also discusses the neutrality of the border slave states that made the Confederate war effort vulnerable. Losing nearly half of the slave states neutrality and the support for the Union army's invasion damaged the geography and population that the Confederacy could use for its defense.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Emancipation Proclamation called for freeing of all slaves in Confederate territory, except in locations where the Union had mostly regained control. Lincoln did not include the freeing of slaves in the Border States for fear that they would secede. The proclamation fundamentally changed the nature of the war because it effectively removed any chance of a negotiated…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “God and the Strongest Battalions,” Richard Current stated that the North won because they had so much more than the South. The North had an advantage over population; near five to two. They had more wealth, manpower, manufactured goods, agriculture, transportation, finances, and the economic stability to fight and win a war. Current stated that “If wars are won by riches, there can be no question why the North eventually prevailed” (Current 15). Current then talked about the Southern advantages. “If statistics were on the side of the North, history seemed to be on the side of the South” (Current 17). The South had the internal spirit because they were fighting for their freedom. The South had the advantage on the geographical side because of the rivers and swamps and because most of the fighting was done on their home front. The last and most important reason that Current wrote about was cotton. He talked about how the South could have used the cotton as a major advantage, but because of bad management and human errors, the South lost all of their hope of winning. Instead of making the best use of the cotton, the South stopped their planting, burned some of the bales and discouraged the foreign trade associated with it. Current then brought up the point that a new light was thrown on the question of whether the Confederacy was more handicapped by human or by material shortcomings. That question was brought up again when Current wrote more about the Confederate leader’s failures when it came to the transportation, manufacturing, and finances of the South. The North had a better economy to start with, and the South would have had to do an immense amount of work to even come close to the North’s resources. Another point that Current brought up next was that the Confederacy faced problems of politics and government along with military and naval problems. Overall, the South could not compete with the amount…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South's predominant economic principle before the War of Northern Aggression was "Cotton is King." The South, as it was known around the turn of the 19th century, was solely dependent upon its cotton production. Low prices, unmarketable goods, and over-used land were driving the necessity for slavery and the need for cotton production out. Were it not for a Yankee's ingenuity, the South as we study it now may have been vastly different.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the proclamation was issued there were nearly four million slaves in America. With the proclamation emplaced, it eradicated nearly three million slaves, and greatly reunited the Union and became a war goal for the North. In addition to the freedom of the slaves, they were given the opportunity to enlist within the armed forces and for once be paid for their service. The…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) Why was the South slow to industrialize after the Civil War? How did industrialization affect the South? Pages 544 and 545…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. consisted of natural resources that would become the driving force for the thriving economy. The central idea of the post-Civil War era of corporations was the dependence on raw materials from around the world and sold goods in global markets. The rising economy was beginning to influence future infrastructure of the growing United States before the Civil War. Also, the politics was a huge part of the disputes of the big businesses that would later be the main reason corporations grew. The U.S. entered a “new economy” which increased in number, size, and influence on big business on politics between the period of 1970-1900 that led to rapid increase in American changes in the economy.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the years before the Civil war, many northerners charged the slavery was incompatible with a rapid economic growth. There was clear evidence that slavery was profitable for individual planters. A number of people felt that slavery was wasteful and inefficient, that it devalued labor, inhibited urbanization and mechanization, thwarted industrialization, and stifled progress. Northerners associated slavery with economic backwardness, soil exhaustion, low labor productivity, indebtedness, and ineffectively growth of economic and social.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The North held an overwhelming industrial advantage compared to the south. It’s estimated that in 1860, The North had 110,000 manufacturing facilities manned by 1,300,000 workers, compared to the south with only 18,000 facilities and 110,000 workers.[i] Railroads were vital for transportation of goods, especially supplies for the war effort. He…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. The Confederacy had other advantages, such as their cotton sale which provided profits in the world market, also soldiers were more motivated…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a lower number of salves in the North since the Northern States outlawed slavery. In result, the North relied on the Southern’s cotton production to made money. Cotton shipment overseas made Northern businesses rich, Northern bankers financed land for plantations, Northern insurance companies made profit by insuring slaves since they were considered property; therefore, very valuable. The effect of slavery overtook the South economically and culturally.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The document states "That all persons held as slaves…are, and henceforward shall be free" (Featured Document: The Emancipation Proclamation). Although president, the only way this document could be enforced was if the Union was to obtain victory over the Confederacy in the Civil War. Archives.gov adds that “Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation, it captured the hearts and imagination of millions of Americans and fundamentally transformed the character of the war” (Featured Document: The Emancipation Proclamation). This is what Lincoln had hoped for; to get Americans to feel as he did about this and rally them to press forward. This would prove to be a huge factor in determining the outcome of the war. Americans in the Union could feel their purpose amongst all the fighting and new what needed to be…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the Civil War, the United States began to undergo significant changes, changes that would eventually lead to the secession of southern states, creation of the confederacy and the beginning of the Civil War. During these years, the nation was in the midst of a transformation from an underdeveloped nation of farmers and frontiersmen into an urbanized economic powerhouse. As the industrialized North and the agricultural South grew apart, acute differences in political, economic and social views proved to further divide an already divided nation. Though both political and social views had significant roles in bringing about of the Civil War, I believe that economic issues proved to be the major factor in the foundation…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So he let the Union supporters continue their slave practices. But the Proclamation had other benefits to it, because it also allowed blacks to be in the army, enabling the North more soldiers to fill the depleted ranks of the military.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays