Preview

Cjs 200 Criminal Acts And Choice Theories Response Research Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
405 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cjs 200 Criminal Acts And Choice Theories Response Research Paper
Criminal Acts and Choice Theories Response
Stephanie Bangerter
CJS 200
April 7, 2014

Criminal Acts and Choice Theories Response
The two criminology models that best suits the basic knowledge of law in this country is the classical and neoclassical criminological theories. The classical theory makes basic assumptions such as:
• “Crime is caused by the individual exercise of free will. Human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will coupled with rational choice.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)
• “Pain and pleasure are the two central determinants of human behavior.”(Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)
• “Crime erodes the bond that exists between individuals and society and is therefore an immoral form of behavior.” (Schmalleger. 2011. p.81)
• “Punishment, a necessary evil, is sometimes required to deter law violators from repeating their crime and to serve as an example to others who would also violate the law.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)
• “Crime prevention is possible through swift and certain punishment that offsets any gains to be had through criminal behavior.” (Schmalleger. 2011. p.81)
…show more content…

The rational choice theory is a logically consistent model that claims that a criminal will make a conscious choice to commit a crime, but only if the benefit of committing the crime outweighs the cost. I believe in some cases that criminals are a product of their environment and some criminals are even created due to mental illness. But I mostly believe in the choice theory. From the time we are born, we are taught the difference between right and wrong. Parents, relatives, and other authoritative figures in our lives play a direct role in the path to becoming an adult. These same people are a part of what we consider

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two most common models that are used to determine which acts are considered criminal are the consensus model and the conflict model. The consensus model is a model in which the majority of the people within that society share the same basic values and beliefs. If anyone in that society deviates from the established norms of that society and their behavior threatens the well being of the group, than they must be punished. Consensus means majority, so that means that the majority of the people within that group must agree what is considered right and what is considered wrong in order to determine what is to be deemed criminal or not. So when that society’s…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rational choice theory teaches that a person will look at a current situation and decide that an immediate need must be met through illegal action. For example, a normally law abiding citizen is watching his or her family go hungry. To meet the feeding need of his or her family, that person will break the law and steal. Because the benefit (not starving to death) outweighs the risk of being caught.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Q. Wilson and Richard J. Herrnstein 1985 put forward a biosocial theory of criminal behaviour. In their view, crime is caused by combination of biological and social factors. Biological differences between individuals make some people innately more strongly predisposed to commit crime than others. For…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rational choice perspective has a six core concepts and four decision making models: criminal behavior is purposive, criminal behavior is rational, criminal decision-making is crime-specific, criminal choices fall into two board groups: ’involvement’ and ‘event’ decisions, there are separate stages of involvement, criminal events unfold in a sequence of stages and decisions(Cornish and Clark). Criminal behavior is purposive when a person decided to commit an offense just to satisfy their needs and wants. Criminal behavior is rational when an individual commit an offense because of the benefits that might get despite how risky is their action just to achieve that goal. Criminal decision making is crime specific, it’s because each individual…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is very easy, now a days with the media, to glamorize crimes and certain cases that have created a spectacle. Many of these famous criminal cases always question the motive of the crime. With this question, come many answers, some leading to theories as to why this particular person would commit the crime they did. Theories try to give an explanation to a cause and link and explain cause and effect. In Criminology, choice theories attempt to explain the reasons a person decided to engage in certain behaviors that caused they to break the law. Some of these theories, such as the rationale theory and sociological theories have a great impact on society as well have affected the criminal justice system.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice theories are based on a perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIS 170

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They are many Criminal Theories from Psychological theories, social theories, deterrence theories and a few more but let focus on, Choice Theory, known as, rational choice theory. People will engage in delinquents and criminal behavior after weighting consequences and benefits of their actions. According to this review in, motivated people, after consideration, will commit crime if they believe that it will provide immediate benefits without the threat of long-term risk (David, et al, 2006). If people have a choice to do crime or do the right thing, why do they choose crime? What causes a person to choice crime? Poverty, conventional life styles, environment, social life, preexisting physical conditions, genetics or theirs past childhood. Many explanation can be an argument and it cause go on, and on.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The rational choice theory says that we are choosing to commit a crime (Schmalleger, 2011). For example, a person has very little income and has a bill due. This person sits back and thinks of ways to come up with the money. Ultimately this person decides the only way to get the money is to commit robbery. Using the rational choice theory this person chose to commit the crime and must now deal with the consequences. The rational choice theory also states that the person who chooses to commit the crime feels the gain from the crime is far better than the repercussions of ignoring the law (Schmalleger, 2011). The rational choice theory is part of neoclassical criminology. Neoclassical criminology says that we are the ones who choose to commit crimes or choose to abide by the law (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When you see the words choice, rational and decision you can put together a definition in itself. Criminals choose to make a decision to act in a certain way, which they see, more benefit than harm. When criminals decided to act out and commit a crime they believe that that is the only rational thing to do, there are no other ways to benefit from a given situation. For example, when criminals steal things to turn around and make money by selling the items on the black market; surely the thought of getting caught has to cross their mind at some point. Maybe whether a security camera might catch their faces, they may leave DNA behind that can be traced back to them or even witness that can place them as the thief. Although they may consider these events, they carry out the crime anyways. Thefts see dollar signs instead of jail time. They see that the chance of getting away with the crime and making all of this money is greater than the chance of getting caught and being punished by law…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Wayne Gacy Jr.

    • 4951 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Criminology is the scientific study of the nature, extent, cause, and control of criminal behavior (Siegel 4). Criminology is not just understanding criminal actions but also studying how to correct and prevent crime, overall. There are five major Criminological theories, (1) Classical Theory, (2) Positivist Theory, (3) Marxist / Conflict Theory, (4) Sociological Theory, and (5) Multifactor / Integrated Theory.…

    • 4951 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages

    4. Tonry, Michael. 1992. "Mandatory Penalties," In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Michael Tonry, editor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 243–74.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Youth Criminal Justice Act

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Crime and deviance is an avoidable trait that will always exist within society. As a result,…

    • 2954 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime and Justice Process

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Victims can pursue one or even a combination of three distinct goals. The first is too see to it that hard-core offenders who act as predators are punished, The second is to use the justice process as leverage to compel lawbreakers to undergo rehabilitative treatment. The third possible aim is to get the court to order convicts to make restitution for any expenses arising from injuries and losses. Punishment is what comes to most people’s minds first, when considering what justice entails. Throughout history, people have always punished one another. However, they may disagree about their reasons for subjecting a wrongdoer to pain and suffering. Punishment is usually justified on utilitarian grounds as a necessary evil. It is argued that punishing transgressors curbs future criminality in a number of ways. The offender who experiences unpleasant consequences learns a lesson and is discouraged from breaking the law again, assuming that the logic of specific deterrence is sound. Making an example of a convicted criminal also serves as a warning to would be offenders contemplating the same act, provided that the doctrine of general deterrence really works.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Choice and Trait Theory

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    criminal in aspects to the crime. So the choice theory is that the criminals choose to…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics