Roman Republics founded what we now call Classical Republicanism, which placed the needs of people as a community above individual liberty and self-determination. Citizens were taught that they should work together to promote the good of the country, not work for private or selfish interests. This way of living favored small communities so there would be less diversity between beliefs, wealth, and way of life. Diversity caused conflict among people rather than encouraging them to work together for the common good. Children were required to learn moral education that consisted of symbols, rituals, and values of society, such as generosity, self-control, respect, fairness, and courage.
In the seventeenth century, Classical Republican theories seemed useless due to the century’s rapid change. English philosophers Locke and Hobbes felt the need of a fresh start that focused on the rights of individuals and not just promoting the common good. The philosophers thought back to a state of nature, which describes itself as a place where all is free with no government to enforce rules or manage conflicts. In order to leave this chaos, the people would need to create a social contract to make a government; this formed into what we call Natural Rights Philosophy which proposed that governments were founded for the purpose of protecting individual rights. It also states that each individual possesses inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property regardless of wealth, social status, or birth.
Together these beliefs had influenced the Founding Father’s views on what a government should resemble. Not only did these two beliefs influence their views, other philosophers and their ideas or ways had made a huge impact on the development of the Constitution. Even Cicero states for Classical Republicanism the importance of an active life of virtue, which builds the foundation of communities, including the community of all human beings. Natural Rights Philosophy inspired parts of the Declaration of Independence and described the role of philosophy in the study of government, which included phrases such as, “Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.” As one, Classical Republicans and Natural Rights Philosophy were combined in the creation of the Constitution.
Education has always been stressed about over the years, but Classical Republicans and Natural Rights Philosophers both strive for all people to have an education and preparation for citizenship. Aristotle states that “Children should during their earliest years be carefully protected from all injurious associations, and be introduced to such amusements as will prepare them for the serious duties of life.” Classical Republicans believed in Moral education which prepared them for speaking and reasoning to be involved in political debates well along with learning and admiring the achievements and civic virtue of heroes. Natural Rights Philosophers stresses that to flourish the freedom, human equality, and individual rights would be through education.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The social contract theory is the belief that people are free and equal by natural right , and that this in turn requires that all people give their consent to be governed; espoused by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke and influential in the writing of the Declaration of Independence. Hobbes believed that a monarchial type of government was necessary to restrain humanity’s bestial tendencies because life without government was a “state of nature.” Stating that people will live like animals without rules. On the other hand, John Locke argued that the government’s major responsibility was the preservation of private property. He also denied the right that no king should govern but also that individuals were born with equal and natural rights.…
- 4775 Words
- 20 Pages
Good Essays -
In natural rights theory, the right to revolution is explicitly given to the people. Locke’s second treatise states that the people created the government, so if the government fails them, “the people have a right to remove it by force.” Thomas Jefferson used this idea in the writing of the Declaration of Independence. If the people gave the government their power, the people can take it away.…
- 389 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Classical republicanism and natural rights emphasize very different ideas. Natural rights philosophy focuses on individual importance. John Locke refers to a natural rights as our givens we have when we are in a state of nature of no laws or rules, rights that come to us as a given as human beings. But people still have to have duties and moral behavior as a citizen, also known as a social contract. Classical republicanism stresses the importance of civic virtue, or helping out society for the benefit through the common good or what is best for the people as a whole. When coming to straight comparisons, they seem very opposite ideas but they both focus on what is best for a country whether that be individually or generally.…
- 657 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In an essay by Duane Smith, he notes that the protection of natural rights and promotion of welfare is the goal, and classical republicanism is the mechanism by which they are protected. Deterred by the tyrannical monarchical parliamentary system, Natural Rights philosophers viewed a social contract as a protection from the government, rather than pledge to uphold societal responsibilities. John Locke’s belief in the unalienable rights of “life, liberty, and property” are fundamental to the individually centered view of society adopted by the Natural Rights philosophy. While Classical Republicans emphasize the role of the individual within the community, natural rights philosophy focuses on one’s liberty to live life as they see fit. This concept is demonstrated in George Mason’s Virginia Declaration of Rights when he claims that, “all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights… namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty,…
- 886 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The theory of classical republicanism is that the best society is one that promotes the common good instead of individual interests. One of the ways that this is done is by limiting individual rights. This idea began in Rome in 509 after King Servius' successor Tarquin the Proud behaved in such a tyrannical way that the outraged aristocracy ousted him. In response to the unspeakable treatment, the Romans changed the government's job. The elite proclaimed themselves the protectors of Rome against tyranny. This mindset became crucial to the ideology through which they justified their political supremacy. From this point on, there would be intense suspicion of any individual who tried to turn popular support into personal power.…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This might be one of the most important readings in our book and its John Locke’s Second Treatise on Government which describes popular sovereignty and the natural rights of people. John Trenchard and Thomas Gibbons also contributed to our readings by…
- 3073 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
In the Age of reason a thinker named John Locke declared that all individuals have the right to be involved in government. “The people are at liberty to provide for themselves,by erecting a new legislative [law making body],...for the society can never ...lose the native [natural]and original right to preserve…
- 525 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Today in our society we can describe our government and way of life as a modern democracy. In a modern democracy it insures the rule of the people by the people in which they share fundamental values and ideals. However our government has not always been in such a total agreement on how the people’s rights can be defined. Consequently the idea of classical republicanism was emerged and was devoted to the common good of the community. Despite the ideals of classical republicanism the natural rights philosophy also included ideals that emphasized more of a close relationship with personal interests. Lastly as our government evolved it has given us a more sense of personal interests but yet for the common good as well, after learning about these aspects one could conclude that our government today’s main purpose should be to serve the people by the people.…
- 759 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
3. Government - The government is a system that decided the state of affairs for our country, state, and community. This is where new rules and laws are made. Not all of them are passed, but this is where it starts.…
- 5943 Words
- 24 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The theory of natural law[->4] is closely related to the theory of natural rights. During the Age of Enlightenment[->5], natural law theory challenged the divine right of kings[->6], and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a social contract[->7], positive law[->8], and government[->9] — and thus legal rights — in the form of classical republicanism[->10]. Conversely, the concept of natural rights is used by some anarchists[->11] to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments.[1]HYPERLINK \l "cite_note-2"[2]…
- 4743 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The source given discusses the prominence of the commonly debatable topic of individual rights and freedoms being neglected to fulfill the goals of the state. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. The source evidently identifies collectivism as well as authoritarianism as its most prominent ideological perspectives. If this source was a legitimate society in today’s world it would undoubtedly reject the natural rights of individuals as well as rule of law, egalitarianism along with the general will of the people. This can be most strongly supported by the following sentence stating, “The individual must serve the interests of a state.” The evidence taken from the source depicts a very strong presence of an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. This type of a society most commonly resembles the life in the medieval period, where everything and anything was used to benefit the state before benefitting its people, due to the divine right of the kings, which left no room for individual worth. The source states “Individual rights and freedoms are less important that the survival and prosperity of the state”, this is an excellent example of the thinking of the early English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As humans, it is our natural instinct to do whatever it takes to survive. The state of nature describes man before any type of civil society is introduced. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were both social contract theorists that have two very different opinions about how exactly we behave and what type of governing body would be most successful. While both Hobbes and Locke agree that individual power must be forfeited in order to achieve peace, Hobbes’s idea of how much power is extreme. Locke’s theories explain human nature more accurately and portray a better form of government through his ideas on natural right and democracy.…
- 1434 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In defining political legitimacy, theorists Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Emma Goldman each put forth a distinct set of values that frame their view on a government’s right to rule. Hobbes, a strong proponent to the right of self-preservation, claims that the protection of life is the only criterion required for a government to be legitimate. On the other hand, John Locke believes that governments should not only preserve life, but also allow for individual liberties and protection of private property, while Emma Goldman maintains the belief that governments use coercion to take away freedoms and therefore should never, under any circumstances, be considered legitimate. Locke’s argument on political legitimacy, that more than just one value is needed to make a legitimate government, is compelling because his criterion protects more than just the life of citizens, it allows for individual’s to have their own liberties free from an oppressive sovereign and prevents the dangers posed by absolute freedom. This paper will set up the lines of government for each theorist and explain why Locke’s perspective on a representative government with separation of powers is more compelling than Goldman’s absence of government and Hobbes’ belief in a sovereign rule.…
- 1651 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Nation may refer to a community of people who share a common language, culture, ethnicity, descent, or history. However, it can also refer to people who share a common territory and government.…
- 298 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A government is a group of people that has the power to rule in a territory, according to the law. This territory may be a country, a state or province within a country, or a region.…
- 2362 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays