Preview

Clause 5 Of The Australian Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
921 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clause 5 Of The Australian Constitution
The rule of law entrenches the basis of the Australian Constitution. Clause 5 of the Australian Constitution states that all laws made by Parliament are binding on the courts, judges and people . It means that every person regardless of their identity is bound to the same law and same legal processes .
The rule of law protects the citizens by securing limited powers of the government. The government must decide lawfully otherwise the court may declare it as void. It grants a moderate degree of protection to the freedom of society as illustrated in the Australian Communist Party Case in which Justice Dixon asserted that the rule of law ‘forms an assumption’ of the Australian constitution . The rule of law also protects human right and freedom as seen in Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration . The amendment of the Migration Act 1958 was struck down as it was contrary with the rule of law that every citizen may be punished for nothing else other than the
…show more content…
Judicial independence is elemental to the rule of law, which protects individual rights. An independent judiciary vitally protects human rights against the state. Chief Justice Gleeson observed that ‘the independence of judicial officers is a right of the citizens over whom they exercise control ’. Section 72 of the Australia Constitution guarantees the independence of the federal and state judges .
Rights and liberties of citizens are safeguarded through judicial independence. The Constitution guarantees the security of tenure, regardless of whether appointed and removal of judges. It protects interference from judicial impartiality. Judicial salaries cannot be reduced during a judge’s tenure. Judges’ remuneration must be adequate to prevent manipulation of salaries by compelling retirement of the judges. By doing so, it would disturb the equilibrium of judicial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    | An important case in Australian constitutional law. It stands for the proposition that there are limits on the scope of express Commonwealth legislative powers which can be implied from the federal character of the Constitution.This concerned a situation where the Commonwealth passed a law that sought to rely on the banking power vested in s 51(13). The Commonwealth wanted to require that states would only bank with the Commonwealth Bank which was at the time a commonwealth instrumentality. This meant that the States required the consent of the Commonwealth Treasurer before banking with private banks, however, the law was passed so as to say no private bank shall do any business with any state unless they had the written consent of the Federal TreasurerThe court said in a 5:2 majority that the law was not applicable to the states as it singled out state body and burdened it in its governmental capacityLatham CJ with whom Williams J agreed, said that this Commonwealth law was not a law with respect to banking it was a law with respect to state…

    • 28193 Words
    • 113 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 12 ]. Justice B M Selway, ‘Methodologies of constitutional interpretation in the High Court of Australia’ (2003) 14 Public Law Review 234, 239.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian legal system doesn't deliver justice equally for all Australians. In this essay, the issues of the relationship between laws to ethics, morals and values, access to the legal system and issues of fairness in the law will be discussed. There are several relevant examples that have influenced the viewpoint of this essay. The case of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, the case of Amy vs Adam (www.lawcouncil.asn.au) and the case of Brendan Dassey.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    70616: Australian Constitutional Law Final exam revision Contents What is in the exam? 4 Interpretation of the Constitution 5 Characterisation of the law 6 Subject matter powers - sufficient connection test 6 As in the Bank Nationalisation Case 6 As in Fairfax (1965) 6 As in Herald (1966) 6…

    • 6031 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The independence of the judiciary from the executive and legislative is said to kept by things like their fixed salaries and sub judice rule. Their salaries ‘are paid from the Consolidated Fund’ and aren’t fixed or changeable by Parliament or the government which keeps the judiciary free from political pressure in terms of finance. The sub judice rule is where the MPs in the House of Commons are unable to comment on current or pending cases. This keeps the judiciary free from political interference and prevents prejudice against judicial decisions. This rule is followed by ministers and civil servants too. Judges are said to be kept neutral because they lack politically ‘partisan activity’ as they don’t comment on ‘matters of public policy’ and avoid siding with different party governments. Another way the judiciary has been made increasingly independent and neutral is the changed position of the Lord Chancellor following the ‘2005 Constitutional Reform Act as he was previously the ‘head of the judiciary, the presiding officers of the House of Lords and a member of the Cabinet’. This Act removed his judicial role and transferred it to the Lord Chief Justice while also separating the ‘law lords’ from the House of Lords via the ‘establishment of a new Supreme Court’ in 2009. This again, separates the judiciary from the legislature and executive which enhances independence and neutrality.…

    • 2833 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I am of the opinion that judges in Australian courts should make law, within specified boundaries. Through the doctrine of precedent, the decisions that judges make in cases before them, form a body of law known as unenacted or judge-made law. The ratio decidendi or the reasons for the judge’s decision form a binding precedent that will direct the decisions of lower courts in the same hierarchy, and guide other courts (Graw, 2005). This body of law, known as decisional law, makes up a large part of law as it stands. However, there are limits on the ability of judges to create laws. Also there are valid…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia does not have a codified Bill of Rights that protects the rights of Australians. Therefore the Australian legal system uses alternative methods like common law, which involves the judge making a decision in a case regarding human rights. The decision made will then become a precedent depending on the level of the court. The Australian Constitution is the other method in which Australia uses to protect the rights of people. The Constitution specifically protects rights like the right to trial by jury and many others.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    • Legalism - Engineer’s case (1920) – assumed that the question is whether the subject matter on which the federal parliament has legislated “squares with” one of the designated subject matters on which it has the power to legislate. If it does, then the legislation is valid. • Approach from this case = Constitutional text identifies particular definitional area and its important to determine whether the subject of impugned legislations within that area. (1) Define the limits of the subject matter area – constitutional interpretation (2) then determine whether the challenged law wiles within those limits. – Characterisation • Judicial approach to characterisation depends on ascertaining the “pith and substance” of the relevant law. The Act specified one list of legislative powers assigned to the Dominion of Canada (s91) and another list assigned to the Provinces (s92). So typically each list contained a head of power to which impugned legislation plausibly be assigned.  Problem – determining which two competing characterisations of the law was the more appropriate.  Approached in a way to identify the true nature and character of the legislation.  Australia don’t have the competing characterisation, have only one list of enumerated powers for federal/central legislature. So in Australia law characterised in a way that brings it within the Cth power not where it…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Australian constitution amongst its express rights also contains implied rights, and the adequacy of these implied rights is rather debatable, as it becomes increasingly apparent that the extraction of our individual rights and freedoms from constitutional implications is an inconsistent and primitive way of dealing with rights, as the essence is lost somewhere down the track, and we find our freedoms being questioned and removed at the hands of the judicial system.…

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is essential for them to be independent and impartial for sake of rule of law. The Rule of Law claims that no governmental figure shall be above the law. Keeping judges as unbiased mediators of the law helps this – dicey claimed “equality before the law- equal subjection of all classes to the ordinary law. It is vital that the courts serve as an unbiased body independent of the legislature which is made the law, and that they act independently of the executive in interpreting the meaning of laws. Central to the general idea of the rule of law is the specific proposition that it involves a rule of law, rather than the rule of people. From this perspective , judges are seen as subservient to, and merely the instrument of, the law; and the outcome of judicial process is understood as being determined through the straight forward application of legal rules, both statute and precedent, to particular factual situation. In applying those rules, the judge is expected to act in a completely impartial manner, without allowing his personal preferences to affect his decision in any way. A further assumption is that in reaching a decision, the judge is only concern with matters of law and refuses to permit politics, economics and rather non- legal matters to influence his decision. The law is assumed to be distinct from, and superior to, those…

    • 1997 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Highcourt

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The source of law in Australia is coming from two resources which are courts and parliament. Courts enact the judge-made law, also called common law, Parliament lays down statutory law. From s109 of the Cth Constitution law, when there is a contradiction between common law and State legislation, common law “prevails”. Common law is stare decisis, it allows judges apply doctrine of precedent to later cases having similar facts. When interpreting the law, courts makes decisions based on doctrine of precedent, however there are no exact two same cases, decisions contains majorities’ subjectivities. Under common law, the decision made by courts follow the hierarchy from local or Magistrates Court & other courts and tribunals to High Court of Australia. From the hierarchy, it illustrates High court of Australia has power over Supreme Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. In another way, High court of Australia has the ability and authority to overturn or refuse applying the ratio or decision of a lower court which are Supreme Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of the same jurisdiction.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    An independent judiciary is Significant as it results in a justice system that is not influenced by either the legislative or executive branch. Moreover it is free to make decisions based upon law and not upon the pressure forced from other groups. The quote "It is vitally important in a democracy that individual judges and the judiciary as a whole are impartial and independent of all external pressures and of each other (Baroness Butler-Sloss–May 2012) visibly condenses this.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are Uk Judges Independent

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitutional Reform Act in 2005 led to the creation of the JAC (Judicial Appointments Commission) which selects candidates for appointment to judicial office in England and Wales. This strengthens the idea that, in this respect, judges are not influenced by pressure from the government as their involvement in the appointment process is restricted. Before 2005, judges were appointed by the Prime Minister and the Lord Chancellor which proved unsuccessful as it made it very difficult to rule out the influence of political considerations. For instance, if the judiciary was to favour the government of the day in this case Labour, the judges might have been more liberal in their judgements, however this point is not particularly strong as the effect cannot be measured. Contrastingly, it can be argued that after the significant changes of the judicial appointment procedure the government still has influence but to a lesser extent.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Report

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Equal access to justice is critical if the Rule of Law is to have any substantive value in the Australian judicial system. Justice institutions must enables citizens to protect their rights against infringements by other people or groups…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule of law

    • 1436 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rule of Law, in its most basic form, is the principle that no one is above the law. It refers to the absolute supremacy or predominance of regular law as opposed to the influence to the influence of arbitrary power and excludes the existence of arbitrariness, of prerogative, or even of wide discretionary authority on the part of the government.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays