Preview

Clausewitz Applicability to Non-State Actors

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1386 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clausewitz Applicability to Non-State Actors
Clausewitz’s theories on war are still relevant today with the revisualization of non-state actors on the world scene. The purpose of this essay is to expand on the applicability of these theories in today’s modern warfare where non-state actors play a larger, more global role. The study of theory, especially translated theory, requires an open mind to determine its applicability to various and ever-changing situations. In the case of Clausewitz, many strategists do not view his theories as relevant to today’s wars involving a Nation State vs. non-state actors. This is not true. The U.S. Army Command and General Staff College teaches that the commander’s intent is the most important part of proper execution. Strategists need to look at the intent of Clausewitz and view within the contextual historic period he wrote it, to demonstrate its relevance today. For the purpose of this essay, a Nation States is a sovereign territory that combines a political and geopolitical entity with a cultural or ethnic entity that was arrived at by self-determination. Non-state actors are groups that operate beyond state control and generally include rebel opposition groups (groups with a stated incompatibly with the government, generally concerning the control of government or the control of territory), local militias and warlords. By reviewing Clausewitz’s definitions of war, his theory of “the remarkable trinity” and the historical examples of non-state actors’ involvement with Nation States in war the relevance of Clausewitz will be apparent. Non-state actors have played a part in wars or have been an opposing force since before the time of Clausewitz. The first example of non-state actors’ involvement in a war comes from the Bible. The founding of Israel is rooted in non-state actors, led by Moses, waging an insurgency against Egypt; resulting in the formation of the first Jewish state. Since the rebirth of Israel after World War II the reverse of this has


Bibliography: Bassford, Christopher. Policy, Politics, War and Military Strategy. 2006. online at http://www.clausewitz.com. Accessed 12 September 2007. Bassford, Christopher. Tip-Toe Through the Trinity (Working Draft). March 2005. online at http://www.calusewitz.com. Accessed 12 September 2007. Clausewitz, Carl von. On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976. Echevarria, Antulio J. “War, Politics, and RMA – The Legacy of Clausewitz.” Joint Forces Quarterly (Winter 1995-1996); 76-80. Paret, Peter. “Clausewitz.” In Makers of Modern Strategy, 186-213. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    TITLE MAJ Evette Barnes, SG6A, AY 2017-18 November 2017, H100 Question: How does Clausewitz's paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries? Carl von Clausewitz defines the nature of war by identifying that which remains constant in all wars using his highly regarded paradoxical trinity ; meanwhile, he acknowledges war has, and will continue to change as the characteristics of warfare change but that the three aspects of the trinity (simplified as government, army, and people ) are constantly at play. It is the variables within the compelling relationships between: instruments…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way in which Clausewitz and Jomini essentially maintain the same principles of war but only differ in what they consider significant such as the idea of movements of armies, the significance of politics and total war principles. Jomini throughout his art of war has shown the importance of planning and strategic movement yet Clausewitz recognizes the significance of other factors of war that are hard to quantify, such as the fog of war, the politics involved in war and the need to be barbarous in…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These are Soldiers with special training that perform medical duties when they come into contact with the enemy.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karspersen, L.B. 2003, The Fission Theory Of The State. In: 'The Warfare Paradigm ' In Historical Sociology: Warfare As A Driving Historical Force, Research Networks No. 21 Social Theory at the 6th ESA Conference, Murcia, Spain. September 23-26, 2003. pp.26-29…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the book, he has challenged preconceived notions that have made his book persuasive about the necessity of studying war, so as to go into greater detail about the debates that he has introduced the reader to. One such example is that ‘war is bad’. One might think, especially in context to liberals that wars should not be fought and nations should resolve all their disputes peacefully through arbitration. Howard has presented examples of when it is essential to fight in a war, for example when war is necessary for freedom. Another example is of liberal visionaries like the Italian, Mazzini, whose ideas of peace could manifest through what he thought to be a just war. In this case it had to be war to get rid of their oppressive Austrian rulers.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clausewitz's Theory Of War

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Unsurprisingly, this statement generates criticism on applicability of Clausewitz’s theory with the increase of intra-state wars since the end of Cold War. For instance, H.P Willmott and Michael B. Barrett argued that Clausewitz’s theory is overly simplistic, and according to the Prussian, war has only one simple nature which is its subordination to policy and the theory lost its legacy as a result of absence of inter-state war since the first Gulf War. At first glance it might seem that war is inherently subservient to a government as it usually generates politics and directs policies. However, governments are not only policy makers and wage wars on another yet emergence of non-state actors brought change in the current security environment. In fact, Clausewitz had an answer to his critics if one read his book carefully. Essentially he said that “…..the feudal lords and trading cities of the Middle Ages, eighteenth-century kings and the rulers and peoples of the nineteenth century - all conducted war in their own particular way, using different methods and pursuing different aims”. It is therefore fair to assume that he was aware of other actors who would have different aims/policies than those of states. With regard to the ISIS, its main aim is to create Islamic caliphate and its actions against Iraqi and Syria governments, and against the West are continuation of its policies. Therefore, it is fair to say that Clausewitz’s hypothesis on war’s subordination to policy is still applicable while policy itself, in other word, war’s one of characters changing over time. War has been and would be always continuation of policy yet policy makers would decide to provoke it under their assumption of chance to succeed as…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military theory spans centuries of conflict all across the world. As such, military theorists have written in a variety of military climates, varying from the absence of gun powder to the presence of nuclear weapons. However, some military theories are transcendent. Some elements of Sun Tzu and Clausewitz are eternally wise. While their similarities may become universal truths, their differences are equally worthy of study because, it is in the differences where choices are made. Sun Tzu and Clausewitz agreed that war is chaos, military action is a tool for diplomatic goals and, as such, the results of warfare are not final. Their differences lie in how they advocate for waging war. The style and preparations for war contrast. This is where…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    State Level Society

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages

    “Though warfare is surely a prime mover in the origin of the state,” Carneiro argues, “it cannot be the only factor.”2 Carneiro contends that war is…

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phillips, Rachel. "Counterpoint: ‘Enemy Combatant’ Is an Illegitimate Exercise of Uncontrolled Power." Points of View (2011). Ebscohost.com. Points of View, 23 June 2011. Web. 21 May 2012.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jasper Jones

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bullying is a huge problem in schools, communities, and homes. Bullying doesn't just happen at a certain age, but it happens at any age. Bullying happens all over the world and is a huge problem that's happening around the world. After The Vietnam War the Australians hated the Vietnamese. " It took 521 Australian lives and left many soldiers with permanent disabilities" (the Vietnam war). The Australians lost the most people ever in this war. After that war any Vietnamese person would have gotten bullied. bullying causes suicide. Because it makes you feel bad about yourself.It makes you feel like you are incapable and/or undeserving of being loved and standing up for yourself.When a bully does something to embarrass you everyone sees it and that makes you feel like a failure.It makes you feel inadequate.It doesn't cause just depression.It makes you hate yourself and others and maybe even the world for tolerating such behavior.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cian O’Driscoll, author of the article Re-negotiation the Just War: the Invasion of Iraq and Punitive War, explains how the arguments of punitive war, or wars of punishment, from both Presidents George Bush and Tony Blair relate to the justification of going to war with Iraq in 2003. O’Driscoll, after explaining the justification of both presidents then relates these justifications to jus ad bellum, a Latin term which constitutes a more moral lethal question, when is it “just” or legitimate to go to war? Jus ad bellum is part of just war theory, which over the years has gained two different entities, contemporary just war theory, or in plainer terms the older traditional way of justifying punitive wars. The second is conventional just war theory, the way we justify punitive wars as of right now. O’Driscoll uses Bush and Blair’s argument in justifying the punitive Iraq war with conventional just war theory, O’Driscoll then relates this conventional justification to how contemporary war was justified back in the days. O’Driscoll is comparing contemporary and conventional just war theory, saying that although there are differences among the two, contemporary just war theory still has influence on conventional just war theory and punitive wars.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli Thesis

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I have done numerous accounts of research, most importantly by reading the art of war written by Machiavelli. This book consists of answering the first question of who influenced him.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time of the Nazis there was pain and hurt everywhere. The Nazis destroyed the life of Jews like Anne Frank. There is conflict everywhere in life. Everyday more problems arise and even more pain is caused. In life humans start conflicts, in fiction there are conflicts, and throughout history there always has been conflicts. When there is conflict, the best thing to do is stay strong and positive.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays