Throughout the 21st century Cleopatra, we have been presented with both a “historical figure and a legend” (Cleopatra, AA100 DVD, Title 7, Chapter 1, The Open University).
Portrayal of the Hellenistic queen shall be examined from the films in eras 1934 and 1963.
We shall take note of similarities and differences, in relation to the period during which they were produced.
Romance is a reoccurring topic throughout each film. In 1934, we see a Cleopatra that is “flirtatious rather than threatening”. …show more content…
However, the concept created an image of a calculative and manipulative stateswoman. Confident and intelligent, speaking seven languages.
Her superiority to understand the maps required from Julius Caesar, and sadness, while the great library of the ancient world burnt to the ground, gives an impression for love of knowledge. This was a film that expressed more than romance.
One analogy are the costumes and staging. Depiction of extravagance and splendour are present in all Cleopatra films. In the 1934 version we see an adaptation renovated “to suit the art-deco age”
“Huge pillars, distinctly shaped table legs, project an ambience of oriental splendour”. Ibid Title 7 Chapter 2. The 1963 production “took extravagance to a whole new level, nowhere is this opulence more evident than Cleopatra’s entry to Rome”. (Ibid,Title 7 Chapter 3.)
Past and present controversy arises in both films, especially during the 30's between the two World Wars. The Twenties began with the ratification of woman suffrage in the west: with voting and equal opportunities. Divorce and pre-marital sex increased, so the Catholic Legion of Decency took action in policing the moral world. Not surprisingly, issues of gender and women’s roles were prominent in the