Preview

Clifford The Ethics Of Belief Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1022 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clifford The Ethics Of Belief Summary
In the arguments done in the article on “The Ethics of Belief,” that’s written by Clifford he states that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.”The example that Clifford gives of the immorality of belief without evidence is the shipowner, who goes for any repair to his own ship and overcomes his own doubts.He believed his ship was seaworthy. Then going through the expense of checking it and making the necessary repairs. This example plays off the belief against self-interest. The shipowner overcomes his doubts for the sake of self-interest. He then goes to collects the insurance money. The worst part is that while he gets his money he lets everyone else that was on that ship die at sea because the ship was proved to be unseaworthy. I do not think that many people realize how odd is Clifford’s argument of 'The Ethics of Belief' really is. Throughout the whole argument, he is …show more content…
He who truly believes that which prompts him to an action has looked upon the action to lust after it, he has committed it already in his heart. If a belief is not realized in open deeds, it is stored up for the guidance of the future. It goes to make a part of that aggregate of beliefs which is the link between sensation and action at every moment of all our lives, and which is so organized and compacted together that no part of it can be isolated from the rest, but every new addition modifies the structure of the whole. No real belief, however trifling and fragmentary it may seem, is ever truly insignificant; it prepares us to receive more of it’s like, confirms those which resembled it before, and weakens others; and so gradually it lays a stealthy train in our inmost thoughts, which may someday explode into overt action, and leave its stamp upon our character

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    So far, we have been discussing the manner in which Clifford argues that it is sometimes impermissible to believe something when one lacks adequate evidence. But remember: Clifford’s position is that it is never permissible to believe anything for which one lacks adequate evidence. How does Clifford extend the argument we’ve considered into one(s) whose conclusion(s) is/are that it is never permissible to believe anything for which one lacks adequate evidence? To what extent are his arguments for this conclusion successful? Explain.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer: I think that Clifford is absolutely correct in the scenarios that he provided. Quickly, Clifford made it clear that the shipowner was fully aware that his ship had not been built well, and because of this the ship had needed repairs often. That means that the ship had been dangerous to be on multiple times before receiving those repairs. The "doubts" that "preyed upon his mind" would be better referred to as logical conclusions that were formed by historical events, and they were conclusions that should have prompted him to repair the entire ship, or at least have it checked out by someone who knew what they were doing. He did not "successfully overcome these melancholy reflections", I think he simply put his concerns to the back of his mind, choosing intentional ignorance for peace of mind over an…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    William K. Clifford sets out to show in “The Ethics of Belief” that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence…” In this paper, I will show that his argument lacks key definitions needed in order to found his inference upon and that it begs the question as to what qualifies as “insufficient” evidence. Furthermore, I will show that the primary issue is not the belief but the results of the belief that is important and that all judgment and interpretation should be based upon said results.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hirschi's Control Theory

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Finally, Belief, which is stated to mirror a person’s conviction that he or she should obey legal rules. ‘the opinions and impressions that are dependant on constant social reinforcement comprise belief’ (Lilley et al 1995:110). The person will most likely conform to the social norms if they believe in them. Hirishi felt that belief refers to the existence of a common value system within the society whose norms are being violated.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He says that it is not important where the hypothesis comes from, but where the decision of whether or not to believe it leads to. This explains that each decision is of an individual, and that it doesn’t matter where it comes from, which is the same for everyone, but where it will take you, which is individualized. This supports the claim that belief comes from what we as an individual are tempted to…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William K. Clifford argues in “The Ethics of Belief” that to believe in anything without sufficient evidence is unethical. Firstly, beliefs guide our actions, and actions guided by unsupported beliefs can have fatal consequences. We have a duty to mankind to perform responsible actions, so our beliefs must be responsible. Secondly, believing without thorough consideration makes one unable to support not just his claims, but his fellow man as well. And lastly, it robs people of their humanity by taking away self-control, skepticism, and judgment, which leads to the stagnation of the search of knowledge and fulfillment (4).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The ship goes down and everyone drowns, and through this example Clifford asserts that it is a “sin” to hold a belief without sufficient evidence. Many times, our decisions and beliefs should definitely have sufficient evidence but sometimes we have a “gut” feeling that helps us through some…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The believer has justification for holding the belief. (2001) This is the Justified True Belief analysis, JTB. The justificatory condition was considered to be the demarcation between mere true belief and knowledge, until Edmund Gettier published his paper, Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?, challenging this analysis. Gettier exposed a weakness by illustrating cases where justified true belief is held, but knowledge isn’t; showing that luck can pervert justification.…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his selection titled, “Introduction: Partial Truths,” James Clifford asserts that ethnographies present “Partial truths” and, as such, are not entirely valid. According to Clifford, “Even the best ethnographic texts - serious, true fictions - are systems, or economies, of truth. Power and history work through them, in ways their authors cannot fully control” (p. 7). Due to these historical constraints, it is impossible for anthropologists to assert the ‘full’ truths about a culture and confidently evaluate and present that culture’s values, norms and ideology. Additionally, Clifford suggests that ethnographies are “True fictions.”…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does my beliefs is properly guided? Is there sufficient evidence will support the claim? Or I’m just complacent by the rules society? Following the rules on what to think, what to believe will enslave us to be passive thinkers. 4.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naturalized Epistemology

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many philosophers think there is a critical difference between “knowing how” “knowing that” and “knowing who.” Epistemology is mostly exercised with “knowing how.” These contrasts may not be described in English, but they are in other languages. Belief is an expression of faith in someone or something. That includes everything that we may find as the “truth.”…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ethics of Belief

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Clifford’s main thesis in “The Ethics of belief” is it it always wrong to believe something without sufficient evidence. It means people cannot believe and trust anything with no evidence to prove if it’s wrong or right. And also no matter what evidence is, wrong belief is wrong event. Like you can’t believe God because there’s no such evidence to prove the God is really exists. No one actually see the God and talk to s/he, to prove that God is a person. So the belief and action are together, because when you really believe in something like you believe God then you actually would follow your belief and take action, this is how the Christian comes that they believe God is exists so their action is follow their belief.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is said, “When you have come to the edge of all light that you know and are about to drop off into the darkness Of the unknown, Faith is knowing One of two things will happen: There will be something solid to stand on or You will be taught to fly.” For as long as man has been known to exist, there has been a development of belief systems formed to explain unknown concepts, explain emotion and reason, deliver purpose, and/or promote happiness. Over time, the belief systems have been constructed into organized religions around the world, which about 85.5% follow. With these belief systems comes the aspect of faith. In this day and age, faith has adopted a variety of meanings and connotations; however, our understanding of faith can be defined as a determined and strong belief/trust, often without proof or evidence. Faith as a whole requires a great amount of emotional and logical proof confidence; I will be exploring the ways in which faith as a basis of knowledge in religion is derived, in addition to extending this exploration into the role of language and sense perception in faith. Thus, I will also be paralleling the role of human sciences, (i.e. psychology and philosophy) as an area of knowledge. As a result, the several weaknesses and strengths of faith will be identified in this analysis.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays