-------------------------------------------------
First, it has been argued that the process of cloning is unsafe. There have been reports on the attempts of cloning animals and only 5% of these attempts have been successful in cloning an individual and the rest suffered health complications. However, cloning animals is different from cloning humans. Reports on cloning humans have not proven the riskiness of cloning. Plus, as technology advances, there is a huge possibility that cloning will be considered safe in the future.
-------------------------------------------------
Second, it has been claimed that cloning humans offer the limitation of genetic differentiation, damaged pregnancies and the decline of genetic diversity, as predicted by scientists. But you see, there are many more benefits that human cloning brings to science and the society. Cloning would help scientists in the course of their researches that will also be useful for the society. It would be a big help for the scientists to find out prevention and cures to genetic diseases. It would also provide organ replacements for people who have organ failures. In fact, cloning would be favorable to infertile mothers because through cloning, they can have children.
-------------------------------------------------
Third, others say, especially religious organizations, human cloning is unethical. They say cloning automatically rejects the cloned individual of his or her identity. And they say in the eyes of God, cloning is immoral. However, the Bible does not say “thou shalt not clone humans…” or something like that. There is no evidence that God forbids us to do such things. Actually, God has given us the gift of making these possibilities in science happen. Cloning has nothing to do with human procreation because it is an artificial process. Plus, the clone has the freedom to live out his own life.
In conclusion, human cloning should be allowed and accepted by the society because first, it can be considered safe in the future, second, cloning is beneficial to science and the society, and third, cloning is not absolutely unethical. And think about it, wouldn’t it be cool for you to have a clone? Someone would do your homework for you, someone would answer your stoichiometry problems for you, someone would take your exams for you! Without knowing because you exactly look like each other?
Thank you.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
As revealed earlier, cloning humans has a high failure rate, because there are many barriers put in by nature to prevent an “unnatural” event from occurring. These barriers can happen anytime during the cloning process. For example, the enucleated egg might not be compatible with the donor nucleus, the newly transferred nucleus may not grow and develop properly, the step where the embryo is implanted into the surrogate could fail, or the pregnancy may fail. Even if the pregnancy succeeds, there is no guarantee that the clone will act like a clone unless the right genes are activated. In a transferred human cloning, the scientist has to re-program the nucleus and force it to pretend as if it belongs in an early embryonic stage. If the nucleus is not programmed properly or completely, the embryo will more than likely become abnormal or die. Now, if the embryo manages to pass all of the post-zygotic barriers, “there is a possibility that the [fully developed] cloned individual might carry certain abnormalities…” causing them to live a shorter life span than expected (Wickman). There are also other concerns, besides health-related, such moral issues. The ability to clone individuals could lead to an out-of-control situation created by someone who wants to create an army of genetic replicas by abusing the new…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Cloning is a process in which an organism or cell is replicated. Cloning should stop because it is not natural, it is wrong to force specific results. Cloning causes animals to live a shorter amount of time or be born with LOS causing permanent damage. What is not natural should not be forced especially if the results are…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
While a large portion of society do not believe that we should clone any species there is the portion that whole heartedly support the quest to prefect not only the cloning of animals but the cloning of humans. By cloning we can create new ways to fight diseases and other health problems by doing things like cloning a liver for a person whose is shutting down. Cloning can also help bring a species back from the brink of extinction due…
- 557 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
"Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," written by Ruth Macklin, a professor of Bioethics, discusses the negative responses people have regarding human cloning. As the title says: "Human Cloning? Don't Just Say No," Macklin believes that cloning deserves a chance to be developed in humans. Though there may not be any substantial benefits to human cloning, nobody has presented a persuasive case that cloning is harmful either.…
- 532 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Cloning is useful on a bacterial level for doing all sorts of science related to DNA. Bacterial clone libraries are kept with every gene we find. Cloning on a larger scale would allow us to produce an organ transplant without worry of rejection from the host. Whole animal cloning is only useful for people who want the same looking pet they had that died or maybe you had a good steak and you wanted to clone that cow. The possible impact of cloning is improving the overall standards human beings. Cloning will do a lot for medical research. It will also challenge people’s ideas about life and about themselves. Disadvantage of the use of cloning are adding clones to the population would make things worse, world would eventually explode. Benefits of the use of cloning such as medical emergencies for an example if someone needed a heart or someone needed something donated or replaced. Cloned genes are also used to produce drugs, insulin, clotting factors, human growth hormone, and industrial enzymes. In 1952 scientists transferred a cell from a frog embryo into an unfertilized egg, which then developed into a…
- 340 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In conclusion, all of Kass’s objections make valid point on why cloning us unethical in our current society. The objections can be seen as premature thoughts because we are not living in the actual era of cloning. Cloning is still very experimental and we do not know all the benefits and effects of cloning. Therefore, some of Kass’s arguments can be ruled out. Even if cloning is improved and become beneficial one question that will remain is, is it ethical to…
- 671 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists alike have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly. No direct conclusions have been drawn, but compelling arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. The following issues dealing with cloning and its ethical and moral implications will be addressed: cloning of human beings would result in severe psychological effects in the cloned child, and that the cloning of non-human species subjects them to unethical or moral treatment for human needs.…
- 1015 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…
- 586 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“ It lays the technical groundwork for cloning-to-produce-children, which raises a host of ethical concerns. It could lead to fetal farming--growing cloned embryos to a later stage so that their valuable organs can be harvested for research or transplantation.” (Stark) This quote shows that clones can be created for their organs which could also help people. “Boisselier said the public needs to know "there is a huge demand" for cloning technology from couples unable to have children.” (Spar) This quote shows that people can use clones as their children if they are unable to have children. As you can see, The evidence shows that cloning would be a big help for…
- 638 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The third argument against therapeutic cloning is that it is not safe. There is a possibility of transferring diseases and other malformations to human. Dolly the sheep was the first animal that was ever clone, Dolly die at a young age. Scientist discovered that the problem of the premature death of Dolly was due…
- 630 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It would have a significant effect on the religious community as it may conflict with religious beliefs. For example many religious groups believe that human clones would not have a soul and that removing the nucleus from the cell is murder. Religious group may also be opposed to the fact the human cloning would mean gay/lesbian couples would be able to have children together. It can also be thought that cloning is like "playing God." The clergymen believe that people do not have to right to change God 's will which what they think cloning will do.People in society in general may also think human cloning is unethical, unnatural and a violation against human…
- 751 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff that will determine what if any, impact that cloning will have upon our ever-changing society. Each side has compiled substantial evidence against the other as to why cloning should or should not be legalized and practiced. It is my strong belief that the curative effects that could be reaped by practicing cloning far outweigh the arguments of anti-cloning advocates; the practice of human cloning should be legalized and practiced. Countless individuals could benefit from its various applications and the future of medicine would be drastically enhanced.…
- 1534 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Thesis Statement: Although human cloning is a scientific discovery of great significance which is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human it has some medical advantages; however, it raises high debates because of its religious, ethical, and scientific disadvantages.…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A great point that helps to prove this point is, “Under what circumstances would we tolerate the creation of a human clone?” (McKie) The answer to this question is that we wouldn’t. I do not believe the world is ready for the radical changes that would occur, and the evidence from the articles helps to prove the thesis because the cons outweigh and contradict the pros. The quote that best describes the topic in general, “The fact that human beings can be cloned is a scientific triumph, but it is also an ethical earthquake” (Smith). Until the world is ready for cloning, that quote will best show how the majority feel about the…
- 1697 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The final argument against the banning of cloning is that it allows individuals or couples to reproduces through means other than sexual reproduction. Infertile couples could benefit from human cloning in that the couple could create a genetic duplicate of one of the parents. Further research even…
- 604 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays