Preview

Clothing In Nora And Torvald

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
777 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clothing In Nora And Torvald
Ibsen further constructs the physical disconnection between the protagonists through the transition of clothing especially in the denouement, yet there are certain metaphorical ramifications associated with them. The differences in the clothing show the incompatibility of the characters and the fact that both Nora and Torvald wish for different things within their marriage. Firstly, the notion of clothing can be associated with inanimate objects such as the Christmas tree. The audience see Nora “dressing the tree” (Ibsen, however the more significant point in the play is during her confrontation with Torvald in Act 2 when we see her “busy with the tree after a short silence”. The aural imagery associated with this dressing of the tree further …show more content…
The playwright constructs the dominant nature of Torvald through his patronising touches in relation to Nora, his role in the confrontation in the denouement and his collected demeanour. Through diction choices such as “threatening” (Ibsen, 7) and “petting her” (Ibsen, 102) constructs an almost animalistic relationship, as if Nora was the “pet” with Torvald as the “master”. Clearly, Ibsen alludes to not only the flaws in the Helmers’ marriage but by extension, the flawed ideologies of Norwegian society in segregating the husband and the wife to generic roles of the dominant and the subservient. The subservient marital relationship shared between Torvald and Helmer is further illustrated when Torvald “puts his arm around her” (Ibsen, 90), when he “lays his hand on her head” (Ibsen, 95) and finally when he “takes her under the chin” (Ibsen, 100). It is evident that Torvald treats Nora as someone who is beneath him; she is certainly not his equal in the relationship, abiding by the stereotypical gender roles associated with marriage in the contextual time period in which the play was written. On a deeper analysis, the way in which Torvald “puts his arm around her” at two points in the play illustrates the way in which he literally and metaphorically cages her in his domineering hold, stripping her of her liberty. This is further reiterated through the way in which Ibsen characterizes Torvald’s role in the confrontation in the denouement, or more specifically, the way in which he asserts his dominance visually in contrast with Nora’s more feeble actions. There is a clear juxtaposition in the modality of the language used in the visual stage directions, as seen by Nora who “whispers quickly, hoarsely, brokenly” (Ibsen, 134) and “tries to get free” (Ibsen,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    At the beginning of the play, Nora seems completely at ease and demonstrates many childlike aspects. Her relationship with Torvaldis comparable with a father and daughter as Torvald addresses Nora with a range of childish nicknames, such as “skylark” and “featherhead”. However, we are given the impression that Nora does not seem to find this patronizing, as she responds affectionately to her husband’s teasing, for example, “Yes!” when Torvald calls “Is it my little squirrel bustling about?”. Ibsen’s use of stage directions also portray Nora’s obedience towards Torvald, as they present Nora as quiet and timid when in the presence of her husband, “playing with his coat buttons” and “without raising her eyes to his” as though she is a shy pet, waiting for orders. Due to Victorian standards of marriage, Nora is expected to serve her husband’s every need whilst keeping quiet about her own, much like a loyal pet.This means that sheneeds his permission for everythingas a woman in the Victorian era is not trusted to make decisions by herself as she is expected to make mistakes. Women were looked down upon and treated as accessories while men were treated like kings.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ibsen uses the symbolism of nicknames to represent how Nora’s façade influences how Torvald treats her because her true personality is…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henrik Ibsen uses connecting themes such as the uncovering of Torvald’s true nature, his real characterization of Nora and the inevitable hampering of Nora’s rightful individualistic growth in order to show this moral justification. In the beginning, Nora’s fondness for Torvald knew no limits and she sought to do whatever was possible without due regard for herself to please him. She believes being the source of entertainment, indulgence, and appeasement for Torvald allows for her own source of contentment. Although Torvald commands a certain sentimental affection towards Nora, the source for most of these feelings however come solely from the appreciation of her alluring outwardly complexion. Nora’s intricate emotions and intelligence take a back seat in Torvalds mind to the more important plastic image that she is mandated to portray. Perfect examples of this dynamic throughout the whole story…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ibsen uses his influence as a writer to touch on important topics such as gender roles in a marriage and display his viewpoints on the issue. Through characterization of Torvald Helmer, the reader begins to understand the role of a dictatorial husband. He treats Nora as an object, instead of the capable women that she is. Although in the beginning of the play Nora is depicted as a dependent housewife, after a lifetime of ridicule, Nora breaks free to show she as not as naïve as the men in her life have thought. Through this it is shown that a woman is not to be dependent on any man, and can create a life of their own, making the world their…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In A “Doll House,” Ibsen uses Torvald’s character to highlight the patronizing quality of the 19th century husband. Torvald addresses his wife, Nora, almost always by pet names, such as “Is that my little lark twittering out there?...Is that my squirrel rummaging around?...When did my squirrel get in?” (859) For the better part of three acts, Nora internalizes the condescension and relishes the adoration—or at least she pretends to. The comments, which serve to reduce her humanity, lead Nora to realize that Torvald is ill-equipped to be a husband or a father, as he can only seem to sustain the relationships he dominates. As she comes to this realization, she tells her husband “There’s another job I have to do first. I have to try to educate myself. You can’t help me with that. I’ve got to do it alone. And that’s why I’m leaving you now.” (907) Although removing herself from the hold of her husband’s patriarchy seems logical, it is uncertain whether Nora will adapt to the realities of an independent lifestyle. The transition from her father’s…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors use the imagery of clothing to address how family members try to mold the women below them in power to their image of their character. For the Sternberg's fancy dress ball Torvald want’s his wife Nora to dress up, “... and Torvald wants me to go as a Neapolitan fisher-girl,...” (Ibsen 37). The Neapolitan fisher girls are girls from Naples, Italy often thought of as possessing a very classic Grecian beauty. These fisher girls have been subjects of many works of art such as paintings and statues. With Torvald making Nora dress up as a Neapolitan fisher girl he is making her into something beautiful and to be appraised like a piece of art. This image of Nora being beautiful like a painting is Torvald’s way of putting Nora beneath him. He dresses her up and parade’s her among their friends while all the while taking ownership of her beauty. Nora doesn’t get to choose what she wears to this ball and she is not recorded saying a word to anyone at the party. Torvald even commands Nora to leave the party after she has finished her dance as he doesn’t want anyone being near her. Nora’s identity is lost in the imagery of her Neapolitan fisher-girl costume and Torvald’s control of her dress. By the same token Janie in Their Eyes Were…

    • 2564 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ibsen, Henrik Subplots

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this very popular drama from the playwright Henrik Ibsen, Mrs. Linde and Krogstad make an important contribution to the drama as the subplot of the play “ A doll’s house “. The playwright’s intent of this play was to dramatize Victorian society and it is clear that without these characters help, the main characters would have probably remained stagnant. Nora would have most likely, never would have come to a self-realization of her own lost identity without these subplot characters. Krogstad and Mrs.L. clearly help the main characters in their evolution throughout the drama with the benefit of their own past experiences being similar to Nora’s.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to convey Torvald's authority in the relationship, Ibsen uses first person possessive pronouns, for example, 'Is that my little squirrel frisking about?', the use of 'my' reflects the ownership that Torvald has over Nora, this links to the ideologies of society at the time were a man owned his wife in the relationship and that a man Just as the pre-modifying adjective 'little' undermines Nora's authority in their relationship and emphasises his power over her. Ibsen also depicts the idea that Nora is in Torvald's household for his own enjoyment by referring to her as a pet, 'My pretty little pet is very sweet but it runs away with an awful lot of money', To him, she is only a possession. Torvald calls Nora by pet-names and speaks down to her because he thinks that she is not intelligent and that she can not think on her own. Whenever she begins to voice an opinion Torvald quickly drops the pet-names and insults her as a women through comments like; "worries that you couldn't possibly help me with," and "Nora, Nora, just like a woman."(1565) Torvald is a typical husband in his society. He denied Nora the right to think and act the way she wished. He required her to act like an imbecile and insisted upon the rightness of his view in all matters.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the start of the play, Nora seems humble and responds positively to her husband’s humor and lightheartedness. “[smiling quietly and happily] ‘You haven’t any idea how many expenses we skylarks and squirrels have, Torvald.’ ‘You are an odd little soul. Very like your father. You always find some new way of wheedling money out of me,”… (Ibsen, pg.8). Ibsen’s view of human life was much tilted toward men in this play and he did a good job making the wife very doll-like in her husband’s eye. “She is to live for his sake only, to have no other thought than of him, no feelings, no opinions, save those which are his” (Jaeger, Henrik Bernhard. Henrik Ibsen: A Critical Biography. Benjamin Blom, inc., New York 1972, pg 240). She is excited about all the money that Torvald’s new job will…

    • 3445 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A doll's House WITT Essay

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first and most central relationship to the play is that of Nora and her husband Torvald Helmer. Nora’s relationship with her husband brings forward the complex social issue of gender roles in 18th century Norway and plays an important role in shaping who Nora becomes. In the play, Torvald often addresses Nora in a diminutive manner by calling her such things as “my little Nora”, “my little songbird” and “my little Nora” (Ibsen 128, 150, 151). While these negative comments are masked as terms of endearment, the impact is made none the less. This degrading manner of communication discourages Nora from developing an independent personality and eliminates the confidence needed for Nora to be true to herself. Furthermore, as per the social norms of this era, Nora is taught to accept the views of her husband and to abide by his wishes. As such, Nora plays along with the views of Torvald in an effort to portray the role of the perfect wife. This role playing as husband and wife can be seen in many passages including: “I’ve lived by doing tricks for you” (Ibsen 191) and “Your squirrel would scamper about and do…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major conflict of the play becomes apparent to the audience when Nora’s childhood friend comes and visits. While visiting Nora shares a secret with Mrs. Linde that she has borrowed money from someone. Everything seems fine until Krogstad blackmails Nora and threatens to expose her to her husband. When talking to Mrs. Linde, Nora expresses how hurtful and embarrassing for Torvald and his macho self-reliance if he was to find out he is in debt to his wife (Act I). Being emasculated because his wife helps him in a situation shows Torvald’s arrogance.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    New Years Day is initially anticipated in the Helmer household, Torvald will begin his “secure, respectable position” at the bank (Ibsen, page 2). With it the moral and financial stature that Torvald craves. Nora will soon be a truly carefree woman without debt. With Torvald’s new job, she will be able to achieve her definition of freedom, and become an even happier person with the debt no longer weighing upon her. So, New Years for both main characters symbolizes the beginning of a happier phase of the “Sunlight” (Ibsen 91) that is their life together. However, as the play progresses, the anticipation of New Years and what it means for each character.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chopin and Ibsen’s work both criticize a women’s place and role in society by using an antagonist to challenge the reader to question morality and a women’s responsibility in marriage. The conflict within their writings is the traditional expectations society had placed on women in the 19th century along with the search for self-identity under such circumstances. In Ibsen’s A Doll’s House the underlying antagonist is Torvald, husband of protagonist Nora. Although not a direct conflict, it is revealed later in the play that Torvald is ultimately in the way of Nora’s happiness, independence and equality.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora’s final walk out from the house seems to be a selfish woman, but it was the example of power and strength of struggle women. Nora wasn’t agreed to live life with Torvalds’s condition. She argue that, “I believe that before all else, I’m a human being, no less than you-or anyway, I ought to try to become one (Ibsen 840).” Here, Ibsen clearly expresses the independent nature of women. Nora believes that women had a right to develop their own individuality, but in reality her role has been often self-sacrificial. She always been treated as a narrow house wife by Torvalds. She shows her eagerness, “you thought it fun to be in love with me, that’s all (Ibsen 838).”Her biggest discovery was to save her husband’s life, but she disappointed when it became an unforgivable crime in the eyes of her husband and society. At the last, she left her husband and children was begets action in her life as a feminist. The whole play based on the beginning of feminism in 19th centuries. Nora who always thought that she was nothing else than the entertainment of her husband transcend her into a independent woman was the most dramatic change on the…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nora subverts traditional gender roles and defies female stereotypes by performing male roles throughout the text. When Torvald becomes very ill, the pair travels to Italy to ensure his recovery. Despite what her husband and society thinks, it is Nora who provides the financial means for the trip, through working and obtaining a loan behind her husband’s back. The audience becomes aware of this while Nora is secretly talking to her old friend Mrs. Linde. Mrs. Linde mentions to Nora, “No, a wife cannot borrow without her husband’s consent” (Ibsen 12). Nora replies, “Oh it is if a wife who has any head for business- a wife who has the wit to be a little bit clever” (Ibsen 12). This quotation is a clear representation of the male authority over women in this patriarchal society. Nora’s defiance of society’s law opposes the female stereotype of “the mindless beauty.” Nora is using logic and intelligence, traits that the men in this essentialist society do not associate with women.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics