Preview

Coca Cola External Analysis

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Coca Cola External Analysis
Executive Summary

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for the Coca-Cola Company is 3121 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2012). This NAICS code is used to identify Soft Drink Manufacturing. However, the icon Coca-Cola is not in this industry alone. The data of 2002 identifies 2,908 competitors in this category (U.S. Census Bureau, 2002). This NAICS code encompasses establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing soft drinks and artificially carbonated waters. Although Coca-Cola has made its global footprint as a leading competitor in this market and they continue strategizing for long-term sustainable growth, Coca-Cola is innovative in their methodology and application to maintain one-step ahead of their competitors and is aware of the market’s increasing demand of product substitution.

Introduction The Coca-Cola Company, now over 125 years in existence, continues to maintain its competitive stance in the global market of beverage consumption. The goliath company’s continued growth may be demonstrated by its ability to 1) identify global awareness of market trends and consumer demand, 2) identify and comply with environmental and regulatory requirements/enhancements, 3) analyze the impact of innovative projects and identify how these external influences directly impact the strategies implemented thus reducing competitive rivalry and competitors ability to take the lead in product substitution.

Threats of Competitive Rivalry

Socio-Economic Concerns

Two major detriments to Coca-Cola’s strategy of expansion into non-carbonated beverages may be the impact of society’s recent economic uncertainty and increased health awareness. Such beverages may be considered luxuries. Although pricing might be competitive, in today’s economic uncertainty individuals may prefer a variety of beverages that offer better nutritional value vice purchasing Coca-Cola’s soda beverages. It is my opinion; Coca-Cola has strategically

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century” is about the “love-hate” relationship between the two largest cola companies of America, as they fight with each other for shares of a $60 billion industry, while also fighting with the industry to increase and fuel growth for cola consumption. From 1975 to 1990 both companies achieved an average annual growth of about 10%, while consumption grew in the U.S. and worldwide, but a turn of events in the late 1990s threatened the companies with consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) dropping for a consecutive two years and worldwide shipments were also slowing. The decline is thought to be from the consumer’s want for alternatives to CSD’s like sports drinks, bottled water, juices, teas, etc. The solution to this problem relies on both of the companies’ abilities to boost flagging domestic sales, venture into emerging international markets, broaden their brand portfolio for new streams of revenue and include non-carbonated beverages in their “big plan”.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The competition within the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been remarkable ever since Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886, and further intensified when Pepsi was introduced in 1893. Ever since then, the CSD industry has been dominated by these two companies, with Coke taking the lead in the early stage, followed by Pepsi doubled its market share between 1950 and 1970 by offering its concentrate at a lower price than its competitor. The CSD industry has been profitable historically due to numerous reasons. Firstly, in the world’s largest market for CSD products, consumption had been growing at a steady rate of 3% annually from 1970 to 2000 in the U.S., marking a high growth stage in the industry life cycle (Appendix B). This allowed both Coke and Pepsi (C&P) to achieve annual sales growth of around 10%, while competing head-to-head against each other and other smaller CSD producers. Competition between C&P reinforced their brand image, as the increase in marketing efforts could be transferred into profit and sales growth when the overall demand was increasing in a growing industry. However, the increasing industry volume was largely obtained by C&P, leaving other smaller firms vulnerable with stagnated growth opportunity. Secondly, according to Porter’s Five Forces analysis in Appendix A, high barrier for new entrants, low bargaining power of suppliers of both concentrate producers and bottlers, moderate buyer’s bargaining power and low degree of threats of substitutes prior to 2000, have been favorable to the high profitability and growth of the CSD industry. In terms of concentrate producers, the manufacture process involves little fixed costs and capital investments. This ensures high level of gross margin for them and frees up funds for marketing related expenditures. As the industry became more consolidated, large firms such as C&P gained pricing power over bottlers through master price contracts. For bottlers, even though heavy capital…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coca-Cola is the world’s number one leading beverages supplier, but their competition does make them quite vulnerable.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Table of contentsExecutive Summary…………………………………………………...……………….3Identify Corporate Mission……………………………………………………………4Industry Structure……………………………………………………………………5SWOT Analysis………………………………………………..…………………10Core Competencies and Competitive Advantage……………………...……………12Strategy Recommendations……………………………………………..……………14Potential Fallout…………………………………………………………………..16References………………………………………………………………..…………19Executive SummaryThe Cola Wars between the two industry giants Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo continues today after over 100 years of rivalry. The competitive strategies of Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have been examined, and even though they are different, both seemed to have been successful to become the first and second companies in the soft drink industry. Coca-Cola with effective advertising, and Pepsi with effective young generation market target, have developed their marketing strategies and began to modify their pricing, bottling and brand strategies. Both companies entered international markets, however Coca-Cola were more effective and lead the markets in most countries. In the 21st centuries, with increasing demand in healthier products both companies expanded their brand portfolios and diversified to find new sources of revenues.…

    • 4629 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dr. John Stith Pemberton is responsible for the discovery of the drink that initially revolutionized the fountain drink industry and has continued its world-shattering hike for the past 126 years and has steadfastly transformed the modern day beverage market. Dr. Pemberton, on May 8, 1886, in Atlanta, Georgia, first introduced his product to Jacobs’ Pharmacy where it was sold for five cents a glass as a fountain drink. The Coca-Cola Company is now the world’s largest beverage company. They own or license and market more than 500 nonalcoholic beverage brands, primarily sparkling beverages but also a variety of still beverages such as waters, enhanced waters, juices and juice drinks, ready-to-drink teas and coffees, and energy and sports drinks. Coca-Cola Company own and market four of the world’s top five nonalcoholic sparkling beverage brands: Coca-Cola, Diet Coke, Fanta and Sprite. Finished beverage products bearing the Coca-Cola trademarks are now sold in more than 200 countries. The Coca-Cola Company has been in existence for more than 100 years not because competition doesn’t exist, but because it has studiously evolved its business policies and strategies. This paper will show how the Coca-Cola Company has maintained sustainability through consistent and reliable quality. Next, this summary paper will show how Coca-Cola’s stewardship toward the environment is an intricate part of its business. Coca-Cola is not only an excellent steward of the environment, but the company excels in the treatment and safety of its employees. Finally, the paper will conclude with a brief description of Coca-Cola’s reporting and policies and will show how the company’s use of external standards such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) to improve overall performance.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages

    This report is based upon the information from the Harvard business case: “Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century”. Both Coca Cola Company and PepsiCo are the largest players in the Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSD) industry. The purpose of this report is to gain insight into the possible strategies that can be applied, in order to expand the overall throat share in the future. History revealed that a highly competitive strategy that was utilized in the past by both companies resulted in a ‘Nash Equilibrium’. Because of this, the report is described from the perspective of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The scope of this report covers not only on the increase of overall market share, but also finding new opportunities in unrevealed markets. The analysis is also based upon the eight key concept model. In addition the PEST-analysis and the five forces model of Porter is also utilized to gain insight into the ‘macro-environment’ and ‘meso-environment’…

    • 3319 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Coca-Cola Company is truly global, and its main product is recognized and consumed worldwide. The Company organizes and structures itself in a way that reflects that fact. At the same time, the Company looks to meet the particular needs of regional markets sensitively and its structure also needs to reflect that fact.…

    • 2564 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When talking about market share, PepsiCo and Coca-Cola have the lions share. They have dominated the industry over the past 40 years with Coca-Cola leading in the category in 2004 (C256). With little resistance from Cadbury Schweppes, the distant third largest company in the industry, the two companies’ main focus was to increase market demand by outdoing each other in promotions, advertisements, and corporate acquisitions. Rivalry and power struggle have defined the existence of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, looking for a competitive advantage to gain an edge on the competition. This rivalry has been to the benefit to the companies, the industry, and its consumers as a whole. Both have learned to not only stay afloat, but flourish in an industry that has constantly grown since Coca-Cola began advertising in 1891 (C258). They did this by increasing the demand in their products, and gaining brand loyalty by their consumers. In some instances, they were selling cases of Dasani (Coca-Cola) and Aquafina (PepsiCo) for less than the cost of bottling it (C267).…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a global leader in the beverage industry, the Coca-Cola Company further indulges in enhancing their value propositions as an instrument to create ‘virtuous cycles of geographic expansion’ and thus greater advantage. Coke, owns the most important elements of the value chain or the “globally leverage able intangibles” such as the brand, the technology, the management, the marketing expertise and the relationships.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Executive Summary Coca-cola Company is leading manufacturer, distributor, and marketer of non alcoholic drinks in the United States of America and all over the world. It is a multinational Giant company that has market presence in almost all countries of the world. The company has also diversified from its initial soft drinks to manufacture fruit juices and other non-soda drinks. Its objective has been to maintain its global leadership in supply of beverages and other non-soda drinks through maintaining high quality production methods that ensure the name and products remain a household brand. Introduction Resource based view approach has been a method most managements have used to formulate their companies’ strategies (Barney, 1991). This is because Resource Based View regards a company’s internal environment rather than the external environment. The advantage of using internal environment as a source of strategy formulation is that the company is able to consider factors which are within its controls; which constitute its strengths and weaknesses (Connely, 2010). This paper presents an internal analysis of Coca cola Company with specific regard to the Economic value of the company, its resources and capabilities that make it distinct from other companies giving it competition through provision of similar soft drinks. Economic value Added In 2010, The Coca Cola Company posted an increase in revenues as compared…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. is located in Atlanta, Georgia. The Company’s North American Industry Classification Code (NAICS Code) is 312111, Soft Drink Manufacturing. (Manta, Inc., 2012)…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Coke vs Pepsi

    • 334 Words
    • 1 Page

    Coca-Cola has been the dominant beverage company in the cola market for a large number of years. Their popularity has soared making them an easily recognizable brand with an image that almost sells it self, literally. Coca-Cola hasn’t always had the best of luck in the history of their existence, whether it be issues with their bottling facilities or having to deal with competition taking away their huge lead in market share. This case is about the war between Coca-Cola and Pepsi.…

    • 334 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introducing New Coke

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ans. The most significant challenge faced by Coca Cola was in the late 1970s when the top executives of the Coca Cola actually paid less and less attention to the marketing and sales of their central product and they were making attempt on diversifications, and the competitor Pepsi during this period targeted the young generation by strong marketing strategy who were yet not emotionally attached coke and they did not realize the strategy of their competitors and thus ran into trouble. When coke management faced the Pepsi Challenge they tried to face the challenge by scraping the original Coca-Cola and introducing New Coke in its place and this created further trouble for them and this trouble was due to the Coca-Cola Company had severely underestimated the power of its first brand. Which Keough admitted “The simple fact is that all the time and money and skill poured into consumer research on the new Coca-Cola could not measure or reveal the deep and abiding emotional attachment to original Coca-Cola felt by so many people. The passion for original Coca-Cola — and that is the word for it, passion — was something that caught us by surprise. It is a wonderful American mystery, a lovely American enigma, and you cannot measure it any more than you can measure love, pride or patriotism”…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    |Coca Cola Vs Pepsi: how a competitive brand proliferation has determined their dominance in the global soft drink industry? |…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Coke recognized that designing products, manufacturing processes and marketing strategies are to be internationally standardized. These factors are dictated by the scales of economy of different countries and the imperative need for cheaper means of production. Thus, Coke studied the five industry forces to evolve its competitive advantage over Pepsi.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays