The aircraft is on the correct flight path;
Only small changes in heading/pitch are necessary to maintain the correct flight path;
The airspeed is not more than VREF + 20kts indicated speed and not less than VREF;
The aircraft is in the correct landing configuration;
Sink rate is no greater than 1000 feet/minute; if an approach requires a sink rate greater than 1000 feet/minute a special briefing should be conducted;
Power setting is appropriate for the aircraft configuration and is not below the minimum power for the approach as defined by the operating manual;
All briefings and checklists have been conducted;
Specific types of approach are stabilized if they also fulfil the following: ILS approaches must be flown within one dot of the glide-slope and localizer; a Category II or III approach must be flown within the expanded localizer band; during a circling approach wings should be level on final when the aircraft reaches 300 feet above airport elevation; and,
An approach that becomes unstabilised below 1000 feet above airport elevation in IMC or 500 feet above airport elevation in VMC requires an immediate go-around (SKYbrary, 2013).
A good example of recent case is Asiana 214 in San Francisco.
Research Question
Why are unstabilised approaches still so prevalent and why are flight crews not conducting go-arounds when one is recognised?