Coercive Federalism

When one refers to federalism, one is referring to the idea that authority is shared between central and regional governments. Now, it is evident that there are multiple types of federalism. Each type having its own advantages and disadvantages. Ideally, though, the most recognized types of federalism are dual federalism, cooperative federalism, new federalism, and coercive federalism. Dual federalism emerged at the beginning of the twentieth century. This sort of federalism may also be referred to as “layer-cake” federalism. The reasoning behind this is that both the national and state governments clearly have distinct duties that each must perform. This federalism was of great benefit to the states because it allowed them to have clear control over certain aspects. Such as, the oil industry and racial cruelty that was taking place. However, even though the states had their duties clear, there was one thing that a state could not do. That is, states could not secede from the Union. Additionally, this type of federalism was not as advantageous for the national government. Given, that their layer in the cake seemed to be smaller when compared to the states (Champagne,
That is, coercive federalism. In coercive federalism, federal guidelines require states to alter their plans in such a way that will meet national objectives. This type of federalism has benefited in aspects such as the Affordable Care Act because it ensured that states don’t suffer the loss of medical founding. However, this federalism also has its downsides. For example, the unfunded mandates that exist. These mandates force states to pay the expenses of federal policies. Additionally, another drawback is federal preemption. Since the constitution is “…the supreme Law of the Land…” some laws that are passed by congress must be practiced in the states whether they agree or not (Champagne, Anthony, et al.