| Stimulate resp center of brain CV system by the carotid arteries and upper aorta…
Charlie Gordon is a 37 year old man with an IQ of around 68. For his whole life, he has only wanted to be "smart" like everyone else. Charlie has two doctors named Dr. Strauss and Dr. Nemur. The doctor's want to use Charlie as a test subject to test out a surgery to increase the Human IQ. Ethics are if you really did the "right" thing, so Charlie's doctor's did not act ethically when performing the surgery on Charlie. They had not kept their choices opinion free, they had not put Charlie's social life over science, and they didn't inform Charlie of the potential risks and side effects of the surgery.…
After reading “From Brain Gain: The Underground World of ‘Neuroenhancing’ Drugs” by Margaret Talbot and the T.E.D Talk “Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance” by Angela Lee Duckworth, I was intrigued to discover the correlation between neuroenhancing drugs such as adderall and the effects it may have on student grit. Talbot discusses the use of neuroenhancing drugs in colleges and raises question about the possible harmful side effects of an addiction to such “brain-boosting” drugs, and if it is providing students with an unfair academic advantage. With a similar focus on student education, Duckworth claims that in education field the main predictor of success if not how smart a student is, but how gritty, how passionate and how persevering,…
1. Attention-getter: Would you ever consider taking a pill that makes you actually focus on getting your school work done even if you weren’t officially prescribed to it?…
Some of the decisive changes described above in the ethical use of drug treatments for…
First, we must look at the logic of the argument. Elliott does a very good job pointing out that more people than you would think are taking performance-enhancing drugs of some sort. He says, “College kids take Ritalin..., musicians take beta blockers..., and middle-aged men take Viagra...” (Elliott 644) all to boost their…
Ritalin is a familiar stimulant drug taken to subdue the typical characteristics of children and adults with ADHD. Ritalin has been proven to be a positive narcotic by responding to the symptoms of attention deficit hyperactive disorder. The familiar stimulant drug offers students equal opportunities in the classroom by allowing those with ADHD the same luxury of learning (Clemmitt). Since taking Ritalin, children and adults alike have noticed an increase in attention, time management, organization, and overall performance (Foley). Explained in Carmen Ferreiro’s best seller, Ritalin and Other Methylphenidate-Containing Drugs, when taking Ritalin the user has more control of how the narcotic affects his or her body due to the drugs short acting…
Cognitive enhancers (CED) are drugs that help improve a person’s intelligence, motivation, and attention, among other things. Adderall falls into that category. In the article Cognitive Enhancement, Cheating and Accomplishment, Rob Goodman was able to get a report from a journalist who has written in prestigious newspapers. This journalist claims to have taken a tablet and right after that he picked up a book, which he didn’t put down until he hit the last page. He goes on by saying “I didn’t stop or stumble once. Perplexed, I got up, made a sandwich and I was overcome with the urge to write an article…” (Goodman) he was able to finish the article faster and better than usual. There was also another journalist who took a tablet for two days and had the same effects. He had a desperate urge to write and worked twice as fast as usual. Both journalists decided to discontinue their daily use of Adderall, but still saved some tablets for occasional use.…
- Stolz, Stefanie. "Adderall Abuse: Regulating the Academic Steroid." Journal of Law and Education 41, No.3 (2011): 585-592. Print.…
Prescriptions for psychiatric drugs to children and adolescents have skyrocketed in the past 10 years. This article presents evidence that the superior effectiveness of stimulants and antidepressants is largely a presumption based on an empirical house of cards, driven by an industry that has no conscience about the implications of its ever growing, and disturbingly younger, list of consumers. Recognizing that most mental health professionals do not have the time, and sometimes feel ill-equipped to explore the controversy regarding pharmacological treatment of children, this article discusses the four fatal flaws of drug studies to enable a critical examination of research addressing the drugging of children. The four flaws are illustrated by the Emslie studies of Prozac and children, which offer not only a strident example of marketing masquerading as science, but also, given the recent FDA approval of Prozac for children, a brutal reminder of the danger inherent in not knowing how to distinguish science from science fiction. The authors argue that an ethical path requires the challenge of the automatic medical response to medicate children, with an accompanying demand for untainted science and balanced information to inform critical decisions by child caretakers.…
Adderall is a drug used for treatment and control of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy. These are neurological disorders that affect both adults and kids similarly. The drug controls impulses, distractions and causes sluggishness. It enhances the level of brain activity in the user increasing the amount of concentration for long periods of time. My little brother has ADD, and he takes Adderall to help him retain his focus. Adderall has sadly been being used for the wrong reasons, not by ”gangsters”, but my respectable students! Students in colleges have reported cases of inability to concentrate in their studies in the hope that they might get their hands on this concentration-enhancer. As a result, they have been improperly diagnosed with ADHD and have started to use this prescription drug for recreational purposes to enhance their concentration capabilities especially during the time they are about to sit their exams. The use of this drug by students at the time of examination and during their assessment has become a common issue in colleges and universities worldwide (“Adderall.” Drugs.com). We should ask ourselves, “Is the use of such a brain-enhancer beneficial or is it harmful?” Being top of my class, I am an avid student and can get obsessive about my grades at times, but using drugs to improve performance is the same thing as athletes using performance-enhancing drugs; it is morally wrong.…
There are three different forms of pills that smart pills can consist of. Natural vitamins, plant derived herbals and synthetic pharmaceuticals. Can these pills have any effect on promoting intelligence? Is intelligence built into our genes? Or is intelligence acquired as we age and gain experience. Intelligence has different levels and everyone believe different things. Some people believe that “smart pills” make you smarter.…
It is this area in which I will be examining, how we establish capacity and whether using medication covertly is legal and ethical, does it make it easier to abuse and use as a ‘chemical cosh’ and looking at the legal and ethical issues related to pill crushing which goes hand in hand with Covert medication.…
However, I now understand the difficulties that student’s face due to possible misdiagnosis of ADHD, prioritizing convergent thinking, and having an increase of standardized testing. The work throughout the week wasn’t particularly surprising. However, one that was rather thought provoking was the article Is Google Making Us Stupid? This was a subject matter that I’ve never been able to place into words. I knew that my capacity to read full-fledged articles had periodically decreased over time. It only took the reference to Hal-9000 for me to understand that our brains are undergoing a subtle change. This article relates in a way to Ken Robinson’s talk. Robinson mentions in order to establish his point about the misdiagnosis of ADHA, that children are living in, “our children are living in the most intensely stimulated period in the history of the Earth,” Robinson says. Children are being punished for being distracted by this distracting information. I can infer that Robinson does not agree with this punishment due to his sarcastic tone. If the children should not be punished for being distracted, then what should be done? Well, I actually have an answer for that. By taking the information I learned from, Is Google Making Us Stupid? I would suggest we teach our…
One neuroscientist, Dr. Gary Small conducted a study where he examined the impact of the Internet on a young persons brain. This study consisted of reading a MRI while the person was surfing on the Internet, and another one while it was reading a book. Then, the results where very surprising: the MRI showed more brain activity in the frontal part, the decision part of the brain, when the person was surfing the Internet. The study reached lots of newspapers, and every person believed that Google is making them smarter. However, after a short period of time, Dr. Small reviewed the results and stated: “On a brain scan big doesn’t mean it is better…It’s exactly as in a golf game, you want to keep your score lower”. One can easily see that this brain activity is without doubt detrimental to all of us and surfing the Internet only decreases our process of thinking, instead of increasing it.…