Cognitive Psy
Introduction
Processing of visual search
Introduce feature search Conjunctive search Top-down effect Bottom-up effect
It has need to
Did you find the feature search or the conjunctive search to be more difficult?
-Compare with guide search model (GS) and features integration theory (FIT)
-Conjunctive search is more difficult
A common observation within visual-search tasks, such as the one in this demonstration, is that the conjunctive absent condition takes about twice as long as the conjunctive present condition. Why would this be the case?
-The conjunctive absent condition takes about twice as long as the conjunctive present condition.
For the conjunctive searches, the rate of increase should be faster for target-absent searches than for target-present searches. The pattern of results for the conjunctive searches is consistent with the idea that attentional focus is moved around from shape to shape. Each focus on a shape takes time to judge whether it is the target or not. This explains why search time increases with the number of distractor shapes. If the target is found, the search stops. On the other hand, if the target is not present, you must search all the shapes. This explains why the target-absent trials take longer than the target-present trials.
That means, if the target is found, then the search for the green circle stops. If the target is not present in the display, however, you have to search through all the shapes on the screen to make sure you have not missed the target.
It could be explained more by Self-terminating model (Sternberg, 1969)
Self-terminating model
Two of process rapid visual search
- Self-terminating processing
- Exhaustive Processing
Better visual strategy
Why does increasing the number of distractors typically slow reaction-times in a conjunctive search but not in a feature search?
Application
Commercial strategy
On sale--Yellow price
Processing of visual search
Introduce feature search Conjunctive search Top-down effect Bottom-up effect
It has need to
Did you find the feature search or the conjunctive search to be more difficult?
-Compare with guide search model (GS) and features integration theory (FIT)
-Conjunctive search is more difficult
A common observation within visual-search tasks, such as the one in this demonstration, is that the conjunctive absent condition takes about twice as long as the conjunctive present condition. Why would this be the case?
-The conjunctive absent condition takes about twice as long as the conjunctive present condition.
For the conjunctive searches, the rate of increase should be faster for target-absent searches than for target-present searches. The pattern of results for the conjunctive searches is consistent with the idea that attentional focus is moved around from shape to shape. Each focus on a shape takes time to judge whether it is the target or not. This explains why search time increases with the number of distractor shapes. If the target is found, the search stops. On the other hand, if the target is not present, you must search all the shapes. This explains why the target-absent trials take longer than the target-present trials.
That means, if the target is found, then the search for the green circle stops. If the target is not present in the display, however, you have to search through all the shapes on the screen to make sure you have not missed the target.
It could be explained more by Self-terminating model (Sternberg, 1969)
Self-terminating model
Two of process rapid visual search
- Self-terminating processing
- Exhaustive Processing
Better visual strategy
Why does increasing the number of distractors typically slow reaction-times in a conjunctive search but not in a feature search?
Application
Commercial strategy
On sale--Yellow price