College Athletes Be Paid
Should College Athletes Be Paid?
Frankly, there is no simple answer to the question of salaries for college athletes. The NY Times Upfront article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” poses two fantastic arguments; “yes” says Joe Nocera, author of Indentured: The Inside Story of the Rebellion Against the NCAA, and “no” says Bob Williams, Sr. Vice President of Communications a NCAA. Although Mr. Nocera makes the valid point of how much revenue college athletes earn for their schools, Williams states how college salary would end the focus of academics for athletes, as well as sparking a controversial new “industry” in college.
The evidence pointing towards the fact that college athletes generate massive revenue for their universities proves that college sports are profitable. “The NCAA and the college …show more content…
“Paying athletes would force many schools to make tough choices and field fewer athletic teams.” (Williams 23) Williams goes on to argue that robbing other potential college athletes of the learning experience in college sports is not the way to go. “The NCAA is committed to fairness and helping all student athletes achieve their dreams.” (Williams 23) Furthermore, he even recognizes the NCAA has work to do, and that there is no simple answer to this problem.
The complexity of these arguments proves little hope of a simple solution. The NY Times Upfront article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” poses two fantastic arguments; “yes” says Joe Nocera, author of Indentured: The Inside Story of the Rebellion Against the NCAA, and “no” says Bob Williams, Sr. Vice President of Communications a NCAA. Although Mr. Nocera makes the valid point of how much revenue college athletes earn for their schools, Williams states how college salary would end the focus of academics for athletes, as well as sparking a controversial new “industry” in
Frankly, there is no simple answer to the question of salaries for college athletes. The NY Times Upfront article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” poses two fantastic arguments; “yes” says Joe Nocera, author of Indentured: The Inside Story of the Rebellion Against the NCAA, and “no” says Bob Williams, Sr. Vice President of Communications a NCAA. Although Mr. Nocera makes the valid point of how much revenue college athletes earn for their schools, Williams states how college salary would end the focus of academics for athletes, as well as sparking a controversial new “industry” in college.
The evidence pointing towards the fact that college athletes generate massive revenue for their universities proves that college sports are profitable. “The NCAA and the college …show more content…
“Paying athletes would force many schools to make tough choices and field fewer athletic teams.” (Williams 23) Williams goes on to argue that robbing other potential college athletes of the learning experience in college sports is not the way to go. “The NCAA is committed to fairness and helping all student athletes achieve their dreams.” (Williams 23) Furthermore, he even recognizes the NCAA has work to do, and that there is no simple answer to this problem.
The complexity of these arguments proves little hope of a simple solution. The NY Times Upfront article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” poses two fantastic arguments; “yes” says Joe Nocera, author of Indentured: The Inside Story of the Rebellion Against the NCAA, and “no” says Bob Williams, Sr. Vice President of Communications a NCAA. Although Mr. Nocera makes the valid point of how much revenue college athletes earn for their schools, Williams states how college salary would end the focus of academics for athletes, as well as sparking a controversial new “industry” in