College Sports Degree

In the article “Why Not a College Degree in Sports” by Roger Pielke published in The New York Times, he discusses why athletes in collegiate sports should get a degree for her sports. I personally believe that athletes should get a degree for their sport, and this essay brings up a lot of good points to support my thought. One valid comparison between Sports and Fine Arts that was stated in this article by saying “performances (from fine art students) are often given to audiences paying for the privilege of seeing exceptional talent on display.” In this instance, I know that sports teams are in the same predicament. In sports, a game is the equivalent to a performance in the sense of showing what their individual skills, and in both scenarios the audience must pay to see the display of talent. With my limited knowledge on the subject, it is my
was a classed that used to be a requirement according to the article. “In the 1920s, almost all universities required P.E. classes toward degrees.” In my opinion if a physical education class was required to receive a degree then there be a degree for it. For my final reason the article said, “But one question that gets little attention is how schools can keep big-time athletics connected to their academic objectives.” I do firmly believe a degree in athletics could help contribute to this problem if athletes connecting to their academic objective. If you want to play a sport and playing it isn’t contributing to their major why would you do both. At that point, the only thing that makes since is to drop either your classes or your sport. In my opinion that is how the situation is for most athletes at a collegiate level. With most of the situations and theories in this article I believe them to be true, but not very impactful on the decision allowing a sports degree. In conclusion, there are many reasons why sports should have a degree, and they can be compared to the fine arts in respects of having a