In the short essay “Two Years are Better than Four” Liz Addison responds to Rick Perlstein ’s essay titled “What’s the Matter With College?” She believes that American community college is where anyone can begin an education, where anything and everything is possible. On the other hand, Perlstein says that college no longer holds importance, and “College as America used to understand it is college coming to an end.” Liz Addison grew up in London, according to their education system an average student needs eight or nine O’levels to their name, whereas she only had one, that is when she decided to come to America and continue her education.…
In Marty Nemko’s article, “We Send Too Many Students to College,” he analyzes and questions whether college is truly worth the money. Marty “holds a Ph.D. specializing in the evaluation of education from the University of California, Berkeley, and subsequently taught there” (martynemko.com) as well as published five successful books. In addition to his novels, he previously was a columnist at San Francisco Chronical and The Atlantic Monthly, also a contributing editor at several other well-known companies. Nemko’s purpose is to convey the idea that, even though there may be reasons one would attend college, the complications overshadow the benefits. He adopts an impassionate tone in order to convince his adult audience to take a hard look at whether it is worthwhile for their children to attend college.…
Over the years, college has shifted from a place of learning where individuals go to voluntarily learn more about a field of study that they want to pursue, to a place that young people feel like they are forced to go to land a job or impress their parents. Known author, Caroline Bird, argues that our generation is only attending college for reasons that are “entirely irrelevant to the course of studies for which college is supposedly organized.” Bird concludes that the new generation of college students only enrolls to impress their parents or have a good time away from home. I have come to the conclusion that Bird is correct in assuming that our generation is attending college for all the wrong reasons based on an overwhelming amount of…
Charles Murray beliefs are that yes and no ‘’too many people are going to college’’, why does he believe this? You ask yourself. Well in his perspective many people go to college for the simple reason that they believe a B.A will get them a higher-paying job. Satisfaction also plays a very big role in choosing whether to go to college or not. Some people would rather go to college to get a B.A to get a high paying job than choosing their dream job that doesn’t pay so high. In conclusion Charles Murray believes people are pursuing a college education for the wrong…
In the reading, Are Too Many People Going to College?, Charles Murray discusses both the pros and cons of receiving a B.A. Murray is very adamant about discussing how society views individuals with or without a B.A. The economic payoff for college is discussed often too, whether or not it is worth the individual’s time and money, is depending on the type of career they choose. College is a large financial investment that should not be made just if individuals think it is “the next step”.…
He tries to integrate anecdotes and facts by professional officials that the reader will recognize and care about to ensure his credibility of his argument. Many people who have went to college and gotten their degree become wealthy or at least financially stable. According to study.com, people with a degree tend to earn eighty-four percent more money than people without a degree. That means, more money for your children, more opportunities, better financial stability, and a better education or more knowledge. Many of the people who don’t go to college have a plan for their future, but not many have back-up plans.…
“Too many people are going to college” by Charles Murray is a very informational article that contains a fresh look at today’s employers and what they look for in their employees. Murray defines the differences and similarities of a traditional university from current times and from past times. Overall, Murray is saying that everyone should not go to college. I agree with Murray’s statement that too many people are being pushed into college when they are not really needed to.…
Whether college matters to people or not, the purpose of college is to prepare students of their career and in all areas of life. Liz Addison is known for her essay published on “New York Times” in two thousand and seven called, “Two Years Are Better Than Four”, which it became a runner up for an essay contest. “Two Years Are Better Than Four” is a response to Rick Perlstein’s essay “What’s the Matter with College?”. Perlstein’s argument in “What’s the Matter with College?” is that college don’t matter and that it ends in America, but Addison opposed the statements elaborating on how college isn’t going anywhere and that it matters for the future. Addison is a writer who graduated in community college of Southern Maine and Piedmont Virginia…
With this as the starting point of the paper we can see that the author is assuming that most students are thinking of going to college as a way of either getting more money or job security. This may be assuming too much on the authors part, but it might be safe to assume that, for an over view, most college students go to college to be able to have higher paying jobs. The author also discusses the flip side on how people are thinking that college may not be the best option and she then gives examples of why people might think this way. Some of the reasons that the author brings up are the rising college tuition, slim job prospects, and the few college drop outs that are successful. With all of the “examples of college drop outs of drops who are wildly successful, such as Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg,” and how the media brings up all of the things mentioned above the author says it a good…
He claims that adherents of the “standard position” are the many people who go to college only to get a better job and earn more money after receiving a degree. Kingwell furthers his argument by rationally evaluating the standard position’s assumptions regarding usefulness: “Something is useful when it has instrumental value” (241), states Kingwell. Instrumental value ultimately refers to money (241), which he feels is a false goal for education particularly since he indicates that money is a “tool” and does not have a “use”. Kingwell further dismantles the “standard position”, by noting that, “The standard position was founded on a paradox: university graduates are overqualified for the jobs they do; but you should still go because there is a statistical link between a degree and higher income” (242). What the author means by this statement is that most people go to college not because they want the education that comes along with it, but because they want the money and the job that comes in tow. After a thorough dissection of the standard position, and the problematic premises and assumptions, Kingwell highlights his views on the college education and why you should really go. He…
Today in America many people question whether or not college is truly worth the stress, time, and cost it throws on an individual. With these “burdens” comes alienation from the outside world with little fun and fulfilling experiences. Some people even say that many college students have zero creativity, and are proud of it. This idea of self-growth and freedom along with a diverting experience, while going through college, is something that Rick Perlstein himself has had the opportunity to do. Unfortunately, Perlstein experienced this in his days, and has come to realization that, “College as America used to understand it, is coming to an end” (Perlstein). With this article being published in the liberal magazine, New York Times, many people, mostly ones who have gone through college, completely disagreed with his opinion. One of those insulted people being Liz Addison. Addison’s claim argues that college is yes, much different, but in a positive way, especially in the community colleges. All together in her one sided- argument, she includes several rhetorical devices to persuade, inform, and emotionally prove her claim. These devices being ethos, and pathos, gives her a strong foundation and effective argument to the liberal audience she is writing her article to.…
College is not for everyone, but it is still worth it. College is more than just sitting in lectures. It is life lessons, gaining friends, finding out who you are, and obtaining the knowledge one needs for their dream job. Even though college is expensive and some graduates have trouble finding jobs in their fields, this isn’t true for all students. There is always scholarships and student loans to help, and getting a degree in a field that actually has job opportunity would help as well. Just because there is a high dropout rate, don’t let anyone tell you college isn’t worth…
In America, college is perceived as one of the most important decisions you will make in your lifetime. Since elementary school, students are taught so that they can one day attend to a good college. However, the question is: is college the best option? Many would say that it is, including authors David Leonhardt of The New York Times and Freeman Hrabowski, author of "Colleges Prepare People for Life". Even though David Leonhardt and Freeman Hrabowski both address the idea that college is worth it in the long run, Leonhardt provides a further convincing argument by revealing where exactly college fits into our constantly growing society, using persuasive word choice, and constantly incorporating facts and statistics.…
Many people in the U.S. have different views on whether college education is worth it. To some people college education is the gateway to a better life and a future but, to some they are able to become successful without a college degree. A degree from college shows how intelligent that person may be. It may also show how wealthy and elite they are. As for people without attending college demonstrate how uncivilized they are. Or so they say. Some degree pays for themselves off some don’t. The debate over if college education is worth it may have begun when the colonialist arrived from Europe and founded “New College” in 1636. People who argue that college is worth it contend that college graduates have higher employment rates, bigger salaries, and more work benefits than high school graduates. They say college graduates also have better interpersonal skill, live longer, have healthier children, and have proven their ability to achieve a major milestone. People who argue that college is not worth it content that the debt from college loans is too high and delays graduates from saving for retirement, buying a house, or even getting married. They say many successful people never graduated from college. Colonial colleges were mainly founded and attended by wealthy Puritans, and followed the models of…
Some people argue that college is a waste of time. For example, in article 2 it states that “ These billionaires achieved tremendous success without the benefit of a four year degree”. That is an understandable concern, however if you go to college you could earn a lot and not have to work as hard. Those billionaires had to work extra hard for that money because they didn’t go to college or just went to a short two year college. So if you are a college graduate you’ll earn a lot of money and don’t have to work as hard as the people who didn’t go to college. So that is the reason why they are wrong about not going to…